Do Modern Means of Communication Make Our Society Better or Worse Essay Example

them for hours and days.

In addition, as long as we are very social in our activities and have face to face communications on a daily basis and electronics do not rule our life, I think that modern communication is a vast leap forward for our society. I mean we can still download information, and finish our tasks quite faster even without being addicted to these forms of interactions. I believe it would be definitely wrong to blame modern communication, only because we can't control our obsessions. It would be a total waste to greet great advances with such incredulity. Watch the difference between stuck on and stuck to.

The literal and figurative meaning changes with the object of the phrase. For example, you’re stuck on a person (fig) or you’re stuck on a job (fig), or you could be stuck to your chair (either fig or lit). Be careful with mail and post. In American English, you mail a letter and you post something by pinning it to a bulletin board (hence, poster = announcement or advertisement), which could be a physical or an electronic board. I repeat the importance of making your position clear. I think you’re saying that modern communication makes society better, but it should be more obvious.

Here’s another way to think about writing this essay: 1. What would I measure (or consider qualitatively) in a society to determine whether it is good society or a bad one? 2. Which of those factors are most important in my opinion? 3. How do modern means of communications affect these factors? 4. Do not write in the essay about

your answers to the first two questions, but let them come out when you say things like, “Modern means of communication make it easier to stay close when physically separated by large distances. ” (This implies that it is good to stay close. )