Latoya Washington Marketing Department Essay Example
Latoya Washington Marketing Department Essay Example

Latoya Washington Marketing Department Essay Example

Available Only on StudyHippo
  • Pages: 3 (652 words)
  • Published: March 26, 2018
  • Type: Essay
View Entire Sample
Text preview

John Carl, the department head, holds power and influence based on his position, while lacking referent power through personal relationships. However, he may be increasing his legitimate power by using his authority appropriately and ensuring adherence to policies and procedures. Only Washington voiced her opinion, indicating that Carl genuinely values input from subordinates without evidence of power misuse. Carl plans to further investigate and create a policy at a later time without negotiating or seeking agreement, instead expressing his viewpoint and requesting feedback (Lousier & Cache, 2012).

Washington likely relies on personal power derived from relationships with the team. She also possesses informational power as she is aware of other departments' activities on campus. Using rational persuasion, she argues that objective tests have clear right or wrong answers compared to subjective ones. Additi

...

onally, she highlights how other departments grant graduate assistants more authority than the Marketing Department does. The author advises considering potential consequences before sending the memo to avoid backlash leading to ostracism and isolation from team members.

In "The Art of Managing Difficult People," Tate (2006) discusses how colleagues may distance themselves from troublemakers in order to maintain positive relationships with coworkers and management. Individuals prioritize their jobs over relationships and will take necessary steps to preserve harmony. While feeling frustrated by the lack of input from others, the author's personality would lead them to directly call out others during a meeting for their opinions. Despite being uncertain about whether others would truly share their thoughts, the author would make inquiries. Even though they do not view the policy as a major issue, they might advocate for a cash machine as an efficien

View entire sample
Join StudyHippo to see entire essay

time-saving measure. Tenured individuals have the privilege of having a voice and would passionately fight for matters that are important to them. Achieving tenure is considered an accomplishment.

After the meeting, my plan was to meet with Mr. Johns and present my case against changing the current practices in a respectful manner. I intended to provide insight into how other departments operated without any issues based on my extensive experience at the school over many years. My goal was to persuade him to understand my perspective. If persuasion did not work, I would consider negotiating for the cantors system instead. However, if the new policy were implemented, I would accept it and respect Mr. Johns's authority as my boss. If the dean undermined Carl's authority and policies, it would negatively impact his credibility.
The text suggests that the dean lacked confidence in Carl's abilities and set a precedent for challenging policies by going to the dean. Employees should know their rank and authority to avoid chaos and questioning of decisions (Tate 2006). Implementing a school-wide policy could be challenging but may be the best solution in this teaching college setting (Lousier & [Author(s) names]). The case study does not allow assumptions about the "dyadic process" between leader and subordinates. Mr. Carl gave Washington the opportunity to speak her mind, indicating he would likely allow others to do the same. John's goal may be organizational adherence as he carefully considers implementing new rules. The dean seems pleased with John's leadership progress, aiming to increase his influence and improve organizational performance (Lousier & Cache, 2012). Undergraduate students should not have knowledge of classmates' class performance. While some may serve

as teaching assistants and receive credit hours, they should not grade subjective exams or evaluate papers for credit. The Ohio State Leadership Style of Mr. Carl cannot be fully understood from the case study. It appears he leaned more towards Initiating Structure Behavior rather than Consideration Behavior. He communicated his thoughts and purpose of changing logic to his team but allowed for feedback.

According to Lousier & Cache (2012), it appears that he adopts a Job-centered approach to leadership. This could be attributed to his shorter tenure in the department and less established connections compared to individuals who have been there longer.

Get an explanation on any task
Get unstuck with the help of our AI assistant in seconds
New