Kardell Case Essay Example

the implications will highly affect the citizens in terms of their health and safety. This chemical has cause the incidence of the miscarriage, birth defects and respiratory ailments as reported. Even though there are no definite proof that all the health problems are linked to the Sonox but number of local doctors have expressed concerned over the unusually high rate of miscarriage and respiratory disorders occurring.

Kardell need to find other ways to produce the paper that are more environmental friendly. Regarding to the Jack’s report, retrofit could have the company shut down for over a year and this should be bad for the employees but we have to think about dumped the chemicals into water could possibly be affecting many people especially for unborn and future generations. Q3 : What Was Wrong With the Quality of the Board of Directors' Debate? The Board of Directors would like to find reasons to show that they’re complying with the minimum standards.

Jack is a young Engineer as an assistant manager at Kardell plant and also a knowledge man. The BOD not affords to lose Jack in this matter. Even Jack found this environmental issue, the BOD carry out an ‘Environmental Audit’ of their operations to clarify this matter. The remaining members of the BOD basically trying to get input from their ‘friends and family’ together with the workers' representatives "who do not care about any problems that may be faced by the company unless they are concern on the profit issues posed problems for.

We do not need to go into" labor dispute "here but, this case demonstrates the potential to increase the"

position "at the expense of someone and overall so far , "Jack" is the only one willing to sacrifice potentially work for what is "right" for Corporate & Community potential at their own expense. Q4 : What is the DOWNSIDE if the Right Decision is Not Made (Considering Economic Factors Along With What Jack Might Do)? The problems with the quality of this BOD is not much different from MOST but not received by the Board of Directors.

THIS BOD have become complacent with mediocre management and the next is not ready to make a decision that best serves the company. Without being aware of their role as BOD to share-holders, there is NO hope for Kardell. Although compliance with current environmental standards, it is only a matter of time before Kardell find themselves out of compliance. A "key" employee has brought attention and his findings to the attention of both BOD and Management Director while both have discounted what he offers to hazards with the potential competitive advantage of the company.

There is no culpability does not comply with the law of what he was brought to the attention of the Company. States would be wise to implement measures to ensure against what is "no longer" required by law or regulation and at the same time set the standard "Corporate Governance" to any and all companies will come to comply with before trying to perform challenging the dominant position Kardell this.

Kardell have a brief opportunity to rise above the standards so as to set the "bar" (benchmark) to another company (potential competitors) to overcome. If the BOD does not seem

to maximize short-term profits while adhering to the minimum standards, the Company may (will) probably be the benchmark for all competitors to comply in the future. Although making use of information and collective knowledge test Company, the Company may seek to establish compliance with the government "on" to the Company's compliance.

In other words, the company can recognize the problems brought to their attention by the management / employees who received the enviable position of "go to" company from government bodies which will get input to the standard States Government time front "extension when this along with their income is beyond the scope of an assignment is". In other words, the Company may be charged more for goods and services they provided to comply with the minimum of supervision.

In Conclusion: The "Downside" is basically "vilification" of the Company which is doomed to fail unless they can avoid the fate of any of the "identified" with their employees, customers, government "operator", and investor- investors of the company. Kardell be "bankrupt" whether the stock-holders or management aware or not really does not matter because it will not take long: They all loss the employees, management, investors, and others.

The other "Downside" do not take advantage of the standards which will be handed down by the regulatory bodies and agencies, regulatory agencies, while Kardell have the ability to make the "right" decision in recognition of what is will come and fix standards shall serve as an obstacle to entry to potential competitors. The "upside" is to maximize profit to share holders ensure return on investment that allows management and employee compensation not only sustained

but may be increased, received government subsidies to create a new "status quo", and thus create a