Ideas of Freire’s and Mark Edmundson on Education Essay Example

method" of training. Inside of this framework information is "kept" into the understudy's psyche by instructors in a way that does not request basic reflection upon that learning. Students are not urged to investigate, reflect, and apply the data exhibited, they are simply permitted to "get, retain, and rehash" (Freire, 72).

Numerous todays’ students are excessively youthful, excessively guileless, and excessively mistook for school. It is true as Mark Edmundson's case that colleges are loaded with a one-dimensional aloof yield of students. One-measurement is all these youthful grownups knowing. Perception is the main level of awareness they have been permitted to accomplish. Listen to the instructor and remember what he needs to say. Watch the TV, and it will demonstrate to you how society functions. The mechanical dispersion of classroom data in conjunction with the TV at home has denied understudies the chance to step past perception and make a move.

Edmundson states, "The TV medium is ungracious to motivation, act of spontaneity, disappointments, and slipups. “All must run splendidly”. In any case, carrying on with an existing past perception—carrying on with a free existence with obligations to satisfy, choices to make, and nobody to fault or credit yet yourself—will demonstrate to you that motivation, disappointments, and slipups are vital, and regularly the most remunerating components of life. Without motivation there would be no workmanship. Without spontaneous creation, there would be nothing unexpected. Without disappointments there would be no grief. Without slipups, there are few rude awakenings to urge us to take a gander at ourselves in a more reasonable manner.

The two, however, differ to some extended. Edmundson advocates for education for transformation (Edmundson, 48). He thinks

that education should be able to make learners better individuals and change society for the better. Freire on the other way thinks that getting the concepts in class is the most important thing. He advocates for students being able to understand what they are taught in class and not banking the knowledge as he argues (Freire, 79).

The two, however, failed to address some key issues. Whether the students understand Freire claims or they get educated for transformation, it is most important to socially appear as educated. Education is supposed to be reflected in the social lives of the students. Morality is supposed to be a key reflection of educated fellows. The current education system does not embrace this with students focusing on education for economic purposes and prestige and not to advance their daily lives morally

However, as the two argues, it is very essential that students embrace the idea of understanding and rehearsing what students learn as argued by Freire. Students in the current schools aim of passing exams. They do not bother utilizing the knowledge they have but look much for passing examinations. This has been the reason as to why the different organizations and careers are flooded with graduates who are not competent (Freire, 90).

As Mark Edmundson says, students should know that learning is not only listening to what the instructor says and keeping in mind what to respond. It is however more off putting to practice and rehearsing the knowledge. They should therefore aim at becoming educated to make themselves better and be of more value, not only in their careers but also the society at large.

Work cited

1. Edmundson, Mark. Why read?.
   

Bloomsbury Publishing USA, 2005.,(34-53)