How important is he to the early stages of the novel Essay Example
How important is he to the early stages of the novel Essay Example

How important is he to the early stages of the novel Essay Example

Available Only on StudyHippo
Topics:
  • Pages: 3 (761 words)
  • Published: December 2, 2017
  • Type: Essay
View Entire Sample
Text preview

The dominance of Keith's personality in the first four chapters is easily noticeable and acceptable.

Stephen establishes Keith as both a hero and a representation of the perfect family. Additionally, Keith's active imagination allows him to create various different worlds. To analyze Keith's portrayal in the first four chapters, I have divided the text into three main areas: his heroism, his vivid imagination, and his embodiment of the ideal family. Frayn's intention is to present Keith as a flawless hero. On page 11, in the second paragraph, Frayn illustrates the boys' belts, which are color-coded for easy identification. He notes that "yellow and black represent the right school...while green and black represent the wrong school." Following this, Stephen elaborates on his own differences from Keith.

Stephen acknowledges that Keith is the dominant figure in their relati

...

onship, comparing him to an officer in the military while Stephen himself assumes the role of the lower-ranked "other ranks." These terms, "officer" and "other ranks," used by Frayn, highlight the disparity between Stephen and Keith. "Officer" implies a position of superiority, whereas "other ranks" suggests inferiority. The admiration Stephen holds for Keith is evident when they plan their activities for the day; Stephen waits for Keith to make the decision. This unwavering admiration is further exemplified when Keith makes spelling errors on page 31, and despite having reservations about his authority, Stephen is unwilling to challenge him. In contrast to Stephen, both his father and brother do not view Keith in a heroic light. Hence, Frayn illustrates the dynamic between Stephen and Keith, portraying Keith as a hero to Stephen but not to others in his life.

On page 22, Stephen's fathe

View entire sample
Join StudyHippo to see entire essay

dismisses Keith's belief in relation to the Juice moving into Trewinnick. Additionally, Frayn highlights Keith's overactive imagination and suggests that many of his claims must be false, with the benefit of adult hindsight. For instance, Keith is the one who believes Trewinnick, the mysterious house, was occupied by the sinister organisation, Juice. Evidence of Keith's imagination can be seen on page 13, where he claims to have seen a talking monkey.

Keith's overactive imagination is evident in various instances. For example, on page 18, Keith believes that his father, dressed in a Home Guard uniform, was actually working undercover for the secret service. The most significant display of Keith's vivid imagination occurs on page 28 when he boldly claims that his mother is a German spy. According to Frayn, this statement sets the tone for the rest of the novel and reinforces Keith's tendency to imagine things. Frayn suggests that Keith's declarations may have come out of nowhere, lending further credibility to his imaginative nature.

Stephen perceives Keith as part of an idealized family. Keith commutes to school on a racing cycle and possesses meticulously crafted clockwork racing cars and speed boats, as described by Stephen. In contrast, Stephen opines on page 14 that not only is his house unsuitable for guests, but his bedroom as well. It is worth noting that Keith has a separate playroom in addition to his bedroom, while Stephen must share his bedroom with his older brother Geoff. Frayn underscores the disparity between Keith and Stephen's living arrangements when discussing the gulf that exists between them.

In contrast to Keith, Stephen has to share a bedroom with his brother, which is filled

with a chaotic mess of string, plasticine, electric flex, forgotten socks, and dust. Frayn uses phrases such as "forgotten socks" to illustrate the difference between Keith and Stephen, creating a visual image of untidiness that contrasts with Keith's perfection. Even the chickens in Keith's family live elegant lives, highlighting their superiority. This difference between Keith and Stephen exemplifies how Keith and those associated with him live superior lives, while for Stephen and most people, chickens do not hold such status. Keith is clearly influenced by his father's class-conscious self and, to a lesser extent, by his mothers. Stephen, on the other hand, is a more natural and normal child who does not share the inherent prejudices of Keith's parents. Without questioning it, Stephen accepts Keith's status as both a hero and a product of his overactive imagination.

Overall, it is evident that there is a strong relationship between the two boys, Stephen and Keith. Keith assumes a dominant role while Stephen appears subservient and loyal to him. Frayn's portrayal of Keith's dominance parallels the wartime childhood, where different countries assert their dominance over each other depending on the outcome of the war.

Get an explanation on any task
Get unstuck with the help of our AI assistant in seconds
New