How Cloning Is Performed Essay Example

also assist the medical field in producing extremities needed for individuals who currently depend on artificial limbs. While the discoveries of diseases, revival of extinct animals, and development of vital organs are all laudable, they are currently unattainable due to numerous reasons. Primarily, allowing a limited scope of cloning would inevitably lead to excessive experimentation. Cloning permitted for these purposes would likely pave the way for further types of cloning, including potentially unnatural species.

Will human cloning become a franchise? Is it ethical to clone a sentient being? What about the events portrayed in Jurassic Park? It may all appear unrealistic, but is it really? Cloning was once deemed as unattainable as reaching the moon, but we have since achieved that feat and cloning is on the brink of reality. These are just a few reasons why strict regulations must be imposed on cloning to prevent any potential disasters. In Jurassic Park, the film concludes with the dinosaurs managing to escape from what was believed to be a secure enclosure. This could be used as an argument to advocate for advancing cloning technology.

Imagine a similar real-world scenario that could result in a catastrophic event. Just like in the movie, what if a biotechnologist attempted to create a hybrid between a cow and zebra? Without strict regulations, it is conceivable that the scientist could even attempt to crossbreed a human and horse. Though this may seem absurd, consider the initial reactions to Huxley's Brave New World, where the idea of reproducing living beings was once unthinkable but became possible when Dolly was cloned in 1997. The ethics behind human cloning arise, as does the question of

creating individuals solely for the purpose of serving others through organ donation. If cloning were allowed in the United States or anywhere else globally, this idea could emerge. THE NATURE OF THE INSTITUTION it potentially involves Reviving extinct animals seems like a fascinating concept, but it may not be feasible. Some species have become extinct because they cannot adapt to the current world.

Furthermore, animals can potentially trigger an ecological crisis by failing to integrate harmoniously with the rest of the natural world. Even if these animals manage to survive without causing a crisis, there are still unanswered questions surrounding their reproduction. One crucial issue pertains to determining the surrogate mother and the carrier of the embryo. Additionally, it is worth noting that not all animals are viable candidates for cloning, as asserted by BLAH BLAH. Certain animals may lack the appropriate DNA strand required for successful cloning, thereby necessitating the introduction of foster genes into the DNA. This process renders the reproduction stage not only unnatural but also potentially hazardous.

In conclusion, the notion of franchising is a crucial factor that necessitates strict control over cloning. Presently, Dr. Wilmut is engaging in discussions with multiple biotechnology companies in order to establish a global embryonic cloning procedure. This concept serves as the rationale behind prohibiting any leniency towards cloning. Franchising inevitably brings about competition, which in turn fuels the pursuit of creating superior clones. The potential consequences of such a race are unknown. It is important to note that Dr. Wilmut is the creator of Dolly.

Wilmut is aware of the effectiveness of his process and its potential for generating identical or even novel embryos. Franchising cloning would

facilitate rapid progress in this field. However, it is important to consider the ethical implications and lack of regard for human life that cloning represents. The potential consequences are enough to impede further development in this area.

Are the potential risks of cloning worth the incredible advancements that science has made?