Evaluating a Website for Credibility Essay Example

Health category in the Social Science citation and #13 out of 140 titles for the same category in the Science edition (Retrieved from http://ajph.aphapublications.org/about). All papers submitted for publication undergo a thorough review process, consisting of three reviewers assessing the manuscript followed by evaluation from the associate editor, deputy editor, and editor-in-chief. The website mentions that most manuscripts are rejected within a timeframe ranging from 2 weeks to 30 days after submission under the Quality Peer Review category (Retrieved from http://ajph.aphapublications.org/about). Following review and potential revisions, publications can be expected to be published approximately 4.8 months after initial submission. In addition, authors from various geographical locations are featured on this website. Overall, it serves as an impartial and accurate platform for both aspiring authors and readers with user-friendly navigation and easy search functionality.

The homepage of the website offers users multiple search criteria options, such as Author, Title, Text, Abstract, and Publication Date. Users can further refine their search by selecting a specific time frame. The website also provides easy navigation for authors, providing information on publication procedures, criteria, and submission options. When accessing an article, users will find all necessary citation references, an abstract, empirical charting data, and the choice to view the full text in either HTML or PDF formats.

The website's Graphic User Interface (GUI) is extremely user-friendly, offering users the choice to apply for membership via regular mail or online. The site employs VeriSign security logo and "https" protocol to guarantee the security of its online content, redirecting users to a secure protocol. It is important to note that no data breaches have been reported throughout the site's history. Moreover, all approval

processes are personally conducted by a live person who manually reviews and makes decisions regarding online applications.

The website's process follows the security standards of the web community, ensuring a high level of information security. Empirical evidence shows that random article searches yield data references that can be verified using MEDLINE and PUBMED. However, the statistical analysis of the data does not comply with a universal statistical approach (Northridge, 2007), suggesting potential irregularities in its reliability.

Despite this, the American Journal of Public Health remains an important source for both domestic and international public health information. The acceptance rate for articles from international sources is 22%, slightly lower than the 25% acceptance rate for articles from the United States (Koch-Weser, 2007). In conclusion, the website of the American Journal of Public Health (http://ajph.aphapublications.org) offers valuable scholarly resources that encompass vital aspects such as objectivity, a thorough editorial review process, and sufficient web security.

The reliability of empirical data remains the most important factor in scientific analysis (References 2010 Journal Citation Report (2010) Science and Social Science Edition. Thomson Reuters, 1-97). In the American Journal of Public Health, Northridge (2009) emphasizes the significance of statistics in the journal, while Koch-Weser (2007) discusses the authorship and fate of international health papers submitted in 2009 (American Journal of Public Health, 87(7), 1092-1095, 83(11), 1618-1618).