The Bolshevik Revolution of 1917: Led by Vladimir Ilyach Ulyanov

of capitalism in russia" after his release he was exiled to siberia where he met his bride to be Nadezhda Krupskaya, They married in 1898(2)

Later on in his political life, lenin joined the social democratic party, Formed in 1883 by George Plekhanov, It combined all the small socialist groups in st Petersburg at the time, wich had been operating seperately. Vladimir assumed the name Lenin while he was a part of this (3) group, Lenin proved to be a skilled political thinker, however, his interpretation of Marxist work differed from the rest of the social democrats, He believed that a Revolutionary party could only be achieved through restricted membership to professional revolutionaries and that the Bourgeois stage of revolution could be skipped, he felt that the Bourgeois in russia were not strong enough to carry out a successful revolution. It was this view that caused the split in the social democrats in 1903, Those that agreed with lenins views on socialism joined the bolsheviks (or Majority) and those that did not became the mensheviks (or Minority), It was lenins views on the bourgeois stage of marxist theory that encoraged the bolsheviks to work against the provisional govournment(1)

After the abdication of the Tsar and the provisional govournment taking control of russia the two sides, the bolsheviks and the mensheviks, contrary to the bolsheviks ideals, the two socialist groups were willing to co-operate with the provisional govournment, at this moment, the Lenin was away from russia in exile, and to illustrate his effect on the revolution it is important to comment of the reletive disorgonisation of the bolshevik party prior to Lenin's return in april of that

year saw a great deal of action within the bolshevik party, unlike most of the bolsheviks at the time lenin had not only a vision to aim for, but a plan on how to get there, the so called "April Thesis", his first step was to gain a majority in the soviets, the unions as they were in russia, who, at the time of the march revolution, had been sharing power with the provisional govournment wich has been described by some historians as "Dualism"(4), lenins plan, by gaining a majority in the soviets was to gain control of the only powerful orgonisation able to take control of the govournment, after he gained control of the soviets, he began to gain support from the peasants, he used such slogans as "peace bread land", and "all power to the soviets"

Lenin soon recieved help from an unexpecected source, General kornilov was appointed as the supreme commander of the german armies, he believed that the provisional govournment lacked the backbone needed to rule russia, he also blamed them for the state the russian troops were in, as a result of kernsky's rejection of kornilovs suggestion to dissolve the soviet, kornilov orderd his troops to march on petrograd (formerly st Petersburg) to turn russia into a military dictatorship, the bolsheviks rallied to petrograds defence and kornilov was repelled, this action by kerensky in arming the bolsheviks to defend petrograd was an important event as it gave the bolsheviks the means to take control of the govournment(5)

Another example of Lenins effect on the revolution, was when he made the decision to actually take the capital by force, it began when kerensky

decided to move the capital to moscow, this gave the petrograd soviet the threat of losing its power, although lenin wasn't there to force add the weight of his own personality and convictions, he succeded in a vote, 10 votes to 2, the red army took began the advance and by 6 p.m recieved a note from lenin ordering the advance further "the situation is impossibly critical. it is clearer than clear that now, in ruth, a delay in the uprising is equivilent to death we must, no matter what, this evening, tonight arrest the govournment, we cannot wait!! we might lose everything!!" On the 25 October, the bolsheviks had taken the city, although lenin was the main force behind the attack, it is important to note that trotsky held a crucial role in the final stages of the revolution, his quick thinking and good decisions effectively won the bolsheviks petrograd, and in turn the bolshevik dictatorship wich soon followed.(6)

Another important effect lenin had was the ending of the war, lenin followed the policy of peace at any price, this was important as it effectively destroyed the revolutionary situation wich had toppled both the tsar and the provisional govournment, the treaty of brest-litovsk wich germany imposed was humiliating to russia, and all of the bolsheviks social revolutionary allies and some of the bolsheviks wanted to refuse the treaty, however, lenin fought them all saying that, "russia simply couldnt fight on", and trotsky's plan of neither peace nor war almost led to disaster, the bolsheviks accepted the treaty and in doing so lost a quarter of her population a third of its textile industry three quarters

of its iron and coal.(7)

It is widely believed that without Lenin's influence, russia would not have become a socialist state, and, although it is impossible to predict all of the "what if" scenarios, this is a fairly true statement, there where many instances where his sharp thinking dedication and decisive action were a key part of the bolshevik victory, for example, the soviets co-operation with the provisional govournment, lenins leadership and "april thisis" got the revolutionaries back on the revolutionary path, the kornilov affair, in which general kornilov attempted to install a military dictatorship, Linin's skillful manipulation of the situation allowed him to gain absolute power, Lenin convinsing the soviets to take power, this was largely due to lenins forceful nature and drive, it is doubtful that they would have attempted a coup without lenins insistance and finily lenins treatment of the war, he removed a popular disturbance wich toppled two regimes and sacrificed land peaple and wealth in order to keep the revolution alive, in summary, lenin was undoubtably the most important socialist influence in russia.