Evaluate the extent to which judges are representative of society Essay Example
Evaluate the extent to which judges are representative of society Essay Example

Evaluate the extent to which judges are representative of society Essay Example

Available Only on StudyHippo
Topics:
  • Pages: 3 (813 words)
  • Published: August 19, 2017
  • Type: Case Study
View Entire Sample
Text preview

Judges are representative of society, but only to a small extent. There have been many criticisms related to the common race, gender, class background and political bias amongst the judiciary.

Judges are generally old, white, rich, middle-upper class men with a public school education, which only really represents a very small part of society.Political bias is a highly controversial area in relation to the judiciary. Academics such as Professor Griffith have pointed out that our judges are too pro-establishment and overtly conservative. Griffith cites cases such as the GCHQ case, where a judge decided against the formation of a trade union in the General Communications Head Quarters on the grounds that national security overrides the need for a union. The decision was made after Margaret Thatcher had voiced her disapproval of

...

any such trade union. Griffiths' point was that judges tend to support the establishment.

However, academic Simon Lee argues that these ideas are far too simplistic to apply to all judges. He states that although the majority of judges are in fact old, white, middle classed men, it does not necessarily mean they will all think the same. Although Simon Lees point that judicial bias needs to be proved is valid, there has however been research into the limited class background of judges. Research found that in 1995, 80% of high ranking judges were educated at Oxbridge and since 1997, 80% were educated in a public school.The Human Rights Act 1998 has made judges more powerful than they've ever been before because they are now able to send an act back to parliament if it breaches human rights.

Since the act was passed, judges

View entire sample
Join StudyHippo to see entire essay

have shown they are more willing to challenge the government on key issues such as detention without trial. For example the Belmarsh Prison Case, where Home Secretary David Blunket wanted to detain suspected terrorists for three months without trial, but was unsuccessful as the judiciary believed it violated human rights.As well as the passing of the Human Rights Act 1998, Britain's union with Europe has had a big impact on judges through the increased use of a purposive approach to statuary interpretation. Joshua Rozenburg argues that bias in favour of the establishment will decrease due to the effects of the Courts and Legal Services Act 1990, which allows solicitor advocates to become a judge, offering a more varied background and making the courts more representative.In recent years there has been an improvement in the number of women in judicial posts, however the current figure stands at only 24.

9%. Up until 2004, when Lady Hale of Richmond was appointed, there had never been a female in the House of Lords. In the high court, only 9 out of 107 judges are female. Statistics such as these have aroused much controversy over sex discrimination within the legal system, with groups such as The Association of Women Barristers blaming these figures on the "old boys network".There have been slightly more women being appointed lower down on the judicial ladder than in in the past, particularly in the number of female recorders at around 20%. Lord Chancellor Jack Straw, has recently talked of plans to open judicial posts to part-timers in a bid to attract more females who might have childcare issues.

Another group in society which is underrepresented, is

that of ethnic minorities. The first ever High Court judge, Linda Dobbs, was appointed in 2004, but despite such improvements the current situation is still worrying, especially since the findings in the Macpherson Report. The report was conducted after there was a public uproar over an incident where a police officer had made the assumption that a black male stabbing victim was a criminal because of his skin colour. According to the report, ethnic minorities do not have faith in the criminal justice system and institutions such as the police force, courts and judges are all seen as "white".It is obvious that the appointments system needs an urgent overhaul if we are to start seeing any change in the future amongst the judiciary with regards to diversity in social class, gender and race. In 2001 the Judicial Appointments Committee was set up, but has thus far failed to adequately address the current problems and presently has no role in the making or recommending of appointments.

However, the current Constitutional Reform Bill proposes an Independent Judicial Appointments Commission which would aim to appoint a more socially diverse judiciary in the future. However, this new body would still only be able to make recommendations and would not have a role in the actual appointment of judges to the Supreme Court.Judges are generally old, middle classed men with a public school education. Whether they all think the same is debatable, but in terms of physically representing society it is clear that our current judiciary does not represent a vast part of the population including women and those in ethnic minorities.

Get an explanation on any task
Get unstuck with the help of our AI assistant in seconds
New