The Major Similarities Between Inside and Outside Lobbying Essay Example
The Major Similarities Between Inside and Outside Lobbying Essay Example

The Major Similarities Between Inside and Outside Lobbying Essay Example

Available Only on StudyHippo
  • Pages: 3 (698 words)
  • Published: June 20, 2017
  • Type: Essay
View Entire Sample
Text preview

The main similarities between inside lobbying and outside lobbying are that both procedures include speaking with state authorities. The Honest Leadership and Open Governance Act of 2007 control the lobbyists groups and individuals According to Peterson (2013), “It is a mandatory requirement for the lobbyist to be registered and be filling comprehensive details on their activities and expenditure” (p. 230). Thus, the process is controlled by government agencies. Inside campaigning is a demonstration that lobbyists are making and maintaining close relations with strategy makers.

An individual involved in campaigning for a politician has to know the intricate details of the business. So, a large part of the lobbyist includes former lawmakers. On the other hand, outside lobbying is a different method of speaking with public authorities by pressurizing as a means of affecting the administration. The government possess more cont

...

rol over the broadcast press than print media (Peterson, 2013). The Federal Communications Commission has the authority to carry out the regulation.

In addition, the Media Corporation currently owns all the main media channels. Other outside lobbying methodologies entail urging individuals to bolster specific politicians and using the media to endorse candidates. Thus, it empowers people from outside campaigning groups to contact their congressman by telephone or email. Changed Audience from the 1970s and the Availability of Unbiased News Over time, media audience has changed. The current listeners have rolled out a dramatic improvement from the 1970's to date (Scheufele ; Tewksbury, 2007).

Patterson (2013) posited that the 1970’s media was controlled by communication systems, which had a huge audience, thus permitting the news to inform many US citizens about various issues. Moreover, the consumers of news have increase

View entire sample
Join StudyHippo to see entire essay

with the evolution of media technology. For the present media, “the expansive networks are still the real players, and the audience is smaller with with debilitated influence” (Patterson, 2013, pg. 260). What is more, there are numerous news outlets accessible to the general population today. Today, most people find news on the internet and social media platforms.

The present and new audiences have the choice to pick what they need to listen to on political matters and avoid what the extensive network has to say. However, there are more options in the news currently for individuals to be educated; this was not the case before. With links as an alternative to mainstream media, people can stay informed without listening to radio, watching television, or reading newspapers (Morris, 2005). Such was not the case before. However, it is a bit hard for Americans to get unbiased news in today’s press (Patterson, 2013).

The links systems are usually one-sided and are not reluctant to demonstrate it. The major television owners do not seem to be partisan, yet their news coverage is inclined to a particular party. Thus, it is not easy to have a communication. Role of Special Interest Groups in American Politics In the US politics, special interest groups possess a lot of power and operate as “Fourth Branch” or extra-constitutional part of the government, with no scrutiny that like other divisions. Most laws are developed and written by non-elected leaders of these groups, though they remain little known to the public (Peterson, 2013).

America has two primary interests lobby groups which are the citizen’s group and the economic groups, which are organized for commercial purposes. The groups typically

participate in political activities to seek favorable laws from the state. The organizations should be allowed to operate the way they are provided they serve as the link between the people and the state. If they their operations are blocked, people will have no one to lobby for better living standards and favorable policies (Peterson, 2006). Besides, there will be no one to monitor various government projects and assess if their impact reaches the citizens.

Without interest groups, people may end up electing political leaders who may destroy the economy and make them suffer (Thomas, ; Hrebenar, 2004). However, some interest groups collect money from politicians and business corporations, which make them biased and protective of these elements even when they engage in corruption (Peterson, 2013. Besides, they often turn a blind eye to oppressive activities by allied politicians. Thus, it is important for policy makers to make laws that regulate the operations of these organizations.

Get an explanation on any task
Get unstuck with the help of our AI assistant in seconds
New