The Dumbwaiter Essay Example
The Dumbwaiter Essay Example

The Dumbwaiter Essay Example

Available Only on StudyHippo
  • Pages: 4 (936 words)
  • Published: March 30, 2017
  • Type: Essay
View Entire Sample
Text preview

This article suggests that the association between Ben and Gus in The Dumbwaiter is significantly imbalanced, driven by an aspiration for power. In this setup, Ben takes on the superior role, while Gus is relegated to the inferior one. Their relationship seems devoid of emotion and loneliness, yet each character is reliant on the other for their very existence validation. The interplay between Ben and Gus fortify their identities; with Ben playing the dominant master and Gus the consequent subordinate. Within the course of the play, Ben maintains dominance due to Gus' compliant nature, reinforcing Ben's superiority in their relationship dynamics. Interestingly enough, with the imbalance in their relationship, Ben seems more confident while Gus shows signs of anxiety and insecurity in his dealings with Ben.

Right from the start of the drama, it's evident tha

...

t an unequal distribution of power skews Ben and Gus's relationship, similar to a master overseeing his slave, as depicted by Pinter. The opening scene portrays Ben sitting in silence, reading a newspaper and keeping an eye on Gus's actions. The script describes Gus as he "kneels and unties his shoe lace" and notes that "Ben lowers his paper and observes him".

The concept that Ben watches Gus as he retrieves a squashed matchbox from his shoe insinuates that there is a distinct lack of emotion in Ben and Gus's relationship. This lack of sentiment is depicted through their hollow exchanges. The conversations between Ben and Gus aren't significant, but involve inconsequential subjects such as the toilet cistern and the kettle. These conversation trends are especially insightful, shedding light on the ongoing power struggle, as Ben turns a harmless argument about th

View entire sample
Join StudyHippo to see entire essay

expression "Light the Kettle" into a severe physical confrontation.

Ben's ruthless pursuit of dominance through the use of force, particularly seen in his act of "grabbing him with two hands by the throat, at arm’s length", showcases the struggle for authority. Pinter significantly highlights the mutual reliance between Ben and Gus throughout the play within their relationship characterized by dominance and submission. The characters' dependencies on each other for defining roles in life form a crucial aspect of Ben and Gus’s relationship. Gus's consistent submissiveness towards Ben’s commands and requirements, a repetitive behavioral pattern throughout the play, offers both characters a clear defined rank in their relationship.

Significantly, Ben's ability to play the Master only holds validity if Gus willingly accepts his subordinate status within their relationship. This mutual dependency is put into question when the demands of the Dumbwaiter challenge Ben's supremacy. Attempting to please the enigmatic dumbwaiter while maintaining his dominance over Gus, Ben's authority increasingly erodes. The arrival of the dumbwaiter poses a threat to Ben's ability to operate within their dynamic, evident as Gus starts questioning the emergence of the dumbwaiter.

Ben's reply, marked by its vagueness, seems to say "Well that all depends-" From my perspective, it appears that Pinter's choice of using the dumbwaiter could be seen as an endeavor to challenge the roles Ben and Gus play within their bond. Clearly, the appearance of the dumb waiter questions the dominant-subordinate dynamic, a key aspect of Ben and Gus's relationship.

The compelling qualities of the dumb waiter make it excessively hard for Ben to exercise authority over Gus due to the presence of an unidentified higher-up. This flaw in Ben's character becomes

evident as he takes on a subservient role, stating, "Good evening, I apologize for the inconvenience, but we figured it would be best to inform you that we have nothing left." Ben's capacity to fulfill his superior role is noticeably undermined by his fear of the dumb waiter's demands.

The frailty of Ben's character plays a major role in his interactions with Gus, as it occasionally hampers his ability to control Gus. There's a moment in the drama where Gus seems to dispute the silent waiter's requests and assumes a role of power, exclaiming "We’ve got nothing left! Nothing! Don't you get it?" However, Ben instantly reasserts his dominance over Gus by physically striking him "back-handed across the chest" and then verbally subduing him with "Stop it! You're manic."

As the drama unfolds, Gus is undoubtedly nervous in his dealings with Ben, taking on an investigator-like attitude. Numerous hints throughout the play suggest Gus's prevailing anxiety. Gus boldly questions the dominant Ben, asking "Why did you stop the car on the road this morning?"

It's clear that Ben strives to assert his existence in relation to Gus; he frequently proposes notions which point to his dominance in their relationship. His desperation to highlight his higher status within their relationship is evident when he questions why Gus interrogates him so much. His most striking demonstration of authority is observed when he urges Gus with "Who’s in charge here, me or you?", reminding Gus of his subordinate status to Ben.

Gus's interactions with Ben often liken him to a human "dumb waiter", given his effortless manipulation and hushing by a dominant figure. He frequently finds himself under the thumb of Ben,

conforming to every request that is made of him. Essentially, Gus adopts the position of a subservient individual, yielding to each of Ben's orders. Without a doubt, the assertive Ben endeavors to dictate and restrict Gus's actions. Throughout the play, one can note Gus being silenced by Ben. There are numerous incidents where Gus says "I wanted to ask you something"; however, his inquiry is persistently disrupted by Ben.

Get an explanation on any task
Get unstuck with the help of our AI assistant in seconds
New