Max Webber vs Henri Fayol Essay Example

leadership, many similar themes are possible. Both analyzed jobs, positions, and individuals.

They believed that authority needed to lead employees and hold people accountable for actions. Although these men had many similar “theories”, each had their own perspective and interpretation of things, even if some were relatively similar. Weber believed in a theory of Bureaucracy and had his five principles, while Fayol maintained these principles for the most part, he had fourteen principles. This is where the differences can be interpreted. Fayol made a person element that Weber and scientific theory lacked.

Fayol wanted organizations to treat employees with respect and make organizations diverse. Weber was more about rules and how to regulate employee behavior, and gave them fewer freedoms while in the workspace. He was less into creativity and innovation, unlike an employee under Fayol’s principles that might have been able to use more freedoms. Henri Fayol also wanted to develop employees that had skills in the organization and improved on these over time which led to efficiency in the workplace/ organization.

Max Weber never stated such; he was more about regulation and rule to increase efficiency. Fayol also believed that personal effort and team exercises were part of a normal organization, Weber wanted less interaction between workers. Both men have shaped Bureaucracy and administration and showed many similar characteristics that have been demonstrated. They also had differences. Businesses today still follow bits and pieces of each man’s organizational principles and this will continue for years to come.