Dramatization and Objectivity in the Aesthetics of Documentary Films Essay Example

distortions in portraying the Inuit family.

First, he encouraged Nanook to hunt using spears instead of gun. This was to depict the Inuit’s fashion of hunting before the European influence. Second, Flaherty also exaggerated the death of Nanook’s family. In the film, he made hem died in peril for not finding shelter.

However, some critics said that it was impossible since the French- Canadian and the Inuit settlements were just near during the filming. In addition, Flaherty made Nanook died due to starvation two years after the film was shot. Again, some critics said that it was impossible and Nanook was more or less died due to tuberculosis (Stern, 2004, p.23).

After this, the dilemma on the dramatization of documentary films became an issue. Pare Lorentz suggests that dramatization in documentary filmmaking is just okay when he described a documentary film as a factual film that is dramatic. From this statement, another issue could be tackled—the topic about the documentary filmmakers commitment to objectivity.

Objectivity

A documentary film is a combination of facts and dramatization. The important question the filmmakers should answer is how they are going to balance the two vital elements of a documentary film. If it is purely factual, then the film is no longer a documentary but a mere scientific or factual video.

On the other hand, if the film employed too much dramatization, it is no longer a documentary but a drama film. Therefore, a good documentary filmmaker should infuse equally both facts and drama in his work. Such excellence in the combination of the two elements was seen in the documentary film “Baraka”

by Ron Fricke. The film is an experimental and purely visual that showcases the various landscapes and destinations in the world.

Although the film has no dialogue, dramatization was still achieved through the magnificent use of camera techniques and the creative skills of the director. Each of the scenes seems to have its own story to tell. In addition, “Baraka” also sticks to objectivity as all of the footages were based on facts.

From this, we could conclude that just like what Bill Nichols has said, “filmmaking practice, a cinematic tradition, and mode of reception” is continuously changing and evolving with no clear boundaries ( Nichols, 1997).

References

Flaherty, R. (1922).  Nanook of the North. Internet Movie Database. Retrievd on 18 June

2008. http://www.imdb.com/title/tt0013427/

Fricke, R. (1992).Baraka. Internet Movie Database. Retrieved on 18 June 2008.

http://www.imdb.com/title/tt0103767/

Nichols, B.  (1997). 'Foreword', in Barry Keith Grant and Jeannette Sloniowski (eds.)

Documenting The Documentary: Close Readings of Documentary Film and Video.

Detroit: Wayne State University Press

Stern, P.R. (2004).  Historical Dictionary of the Inuit. Lanham, MD: Scarecrow Press, p. 23.