Advantages It To Consumers Perception Of Persuasive Essay Example

style="text-align: justify;">Due to this very reason Richard E. Petty and John T. Cacioppo created the Elaboration Likelihood Model or the ELM Model which was a model based on persuasion. The ELM model explains how the message of persuasion changes the perception and attitude of a person who receives it.

The model explained that “a message was transmitted and received through one of two routes of persuasion:  the central route and the peripheral route” (Moore, 2001).

Central route
The Central route requires a lot of thought and a lot of elaboration. Such processes entail cautious analysis of a communication technique that is persuasive. Under such circumstances people’s individual cognitive reactions to the communication determines the result which is nothing but the route and importance of the change involved.

So if the thoughts are favourable than the messages will be agreed to and if it is not favourable the message will be rejected (Petty & Cacioppo, 1986).

Peripheral route
The Peripheral route does not involve much elaboration or thought, it is therefore not channelised. In such a route the persuaive arguemnt is very weak focusing on messages that is indirectly connected to message subject itself. Decision here will be based on the indirect and familiar influences.

Therefore such routes emphasize situations whether to view projected drops within a person’s available choice for approval or dismissal (Sherif, Sherif, and Nebergall, 1965).

Factors that influence
Consumers are easily influenced by two factors which are motivation or the great need for wanting to deal with the message (Petty & Cacioppo, 1979).

Motivational factor will include a persons personal opinion of the message that is showed and

the desire to think and realise. The second factor is ability which is nothing but the capability of evelauating a message critically (Petty, Wells, & Brock, 1976).

The route that is adopted is based on detailed eloboration of these above mentioned factors. This factor takes into account time, presure, distractions of arguments that are required to be scrutinized.

There are other factors such as attitudes, contextual matters which have eloboration of messages as high, low and moderate. Some recent changes to the model include taking into account factors such as confidence, trust which gives rise to the metacognitive environment that happen in conditions that have a higher rate of elaboration (Petty, Briñol, & Tormala, 2002).

Limitations
Some of the lmitations of the ELM Model are as follows,

·    Some of the initial models were complex, prediction factor was lesser and the usage intiself was not that practical.

·    The theory of ELM model cannot be called a scientific model.

·    The theory also cannot be tested for doubtfulness when checking for strong and weak arguments.

·    There still are many other different theorises that synthesize the aspect of persuasion.

According to Perloff, R.M (2003), there are two main limitaions they are as follows,

·    People think a lot of messages and these thoughts are sometimes overidden by communications that are persuasive, which causes any decsion to be made more by “mental shortcuts”.

·    Failed to explain as to how and why messages can influence people and how these people can change their minds, thoughts and attitudes.

According to Gotlieb and Swan (1990), consumers also tend

towards price saving as a motivation to deal with the message, but there is not much eveidence that justifies the level of motivation. The paper also explains that the ELM Model does not suffciently predict the argument effects of a message.

According to Cole, Ettenson, Reinke, and Schrader (1990), all the three experiments that were based on the ELM model gave “conflicting results”. These pssibilities can be explained in the following points,

·    Product cues depended on individual consumers, advertisemnts, and the circumstances. It was found that these factors were changed for the experiment to get the expected results. It was therefore found that consumers tended to respond to advertisements that were robust and should be able to handle small changes.

·    Some ads such as billboards ghave away very little information as compared to other advertisement techniques. The ELM model was therefore does not correctly specify what is a central and what is a peripheral route (Bitner and Obermiller (1985).

·    The route need to be continuous rather than discontinous. Manipulations tend to be involvements and therefore may not give the expected results although actual methods used by Petty, R, Cacioppo, J.I and Schumann, D (1983) in their experiment.

Conclusion
From the above detailed explanation it can be seen that advertisers have basically two choices to make, firstly the central route and secondly the peripheral route to persuade their consumers. Central route uses greater elaboration and produces positive change in attitude.

The peripheral route requires a low level of elaboration and gets a quick response although there is a small change in attitude.

Many have found that the

Elaboration Likelihood Model although scientific has been difficult if compared to the traditional scientific standards.

The model restricts itself only with explaining the two different routes for persuasions and the best situation for each of them. Although many have found that the model cannot be used to determine doubt and any internal stability.

Although the ELM Model is reasonably accurate on attitude change and its achievements along with the any difficulty in making a great change in attitude. Although this can not be applied for all situations, but still provides a very beneficial framework in the long run.

Consumers can be easily persuaded by communication if they pay even more attention to the content of the advertisement other than the advertisements credibility or attractiveness or any other factors that would tend to sway the attitude and opinion of the consumer (Fishbein and Ajzen, 1981).

Whereas a study done by Yang, Hung, Sung and Farn (2006) found that according to the ELM model consumers that had “high involvement” but “low anxiety” used the central route and consumers that had “low involvement” but “high anxiety” used the peripheral route.

Any company that deals with organic products can easily benefit from this model provided it follows the routes laid done by the ELM model. The different persuasive messages that are publicized in different ways such as billboards, newspapers, internet, blogs all need to be changed and modified to the group of consumers that needs to be targeted.

This modification will help the business improve its sales and aim at consumers from different walks of life. Some consumers may not like something but

if the product is advertised properly than it is very easy persuade the consumer to buy the product.