3:10 to Yuma Remake Comparison Essay Example

You could see the dirty terrain of the mountains and the fire actually had color in the scene where the Indians attack. Now the sounds of guns were better. This being a movie where there are action packed scenes where guns were used failed horribly in the first version. Like come on I could immediately tell all gun shots were just fake and low quality sounds.

Like in the remake when the colt revolver or the 12 gauge double action shotgun was fired I could actually feel the gun shots being fired. Every time there was a gun shot fired I would get this feeling in my chest that the gun shots were almost actually real. Lastly, the acting was better. The remake of the film had popular casts like Russell Crowe, Christian Bale, and Ben Foster. The actors in the first version of 3:10 to Yuma were pretty good but not as good as the actors in the remake. Russell Crowe played the role of Ben Wade perfectly.

There is no other actor out there as good as Russell Crowe to play the role of Ben Wade. Glenn Ford was okay maybe to be considered good but not on the level of Russell Crowe. The remake of 3:10 to Yuma was phenomenal. Now the remake of 3:10 to Yuma was better than the past version. Three reasons, first off the sound and the visuals were way better in the remake, second, the settings and the realistic feel and the sounds of guns were better, and lastly, the acting was better. The older version of 3:10 to Yuma was a very old film

and basing it off of what materials the director had available the director still did a poor job.