Disability Portrays Negative Connotations Theology Religion
The word disablement portrays negative intensions and stigmas, but this is mostly due to society and how people define and perceive disablement taking into history assorted factors like socio- economic position, race, cultural back unit of ammunitions and degree of instruction. There is a deep- frozen demand to look normal ; normal in the sense of holding no apparent disablement including that of sightlessness. But in the crude times, the blind were non regarded as being of much value or usage to the societies in which they lived. It was assumed that they could non run fish for nutrient for basic nutriment. Thus it is easy to see how the destructive and negative societal attitudes about sightlessness developed and flourished through times and was reinforced with each coevals. It mostly still holds today.
In my literature reappraisal I will discourse the societal deductions and surveies conducted about unsighted people in different societal scenes and reflect on how society perceived them and still do. I will talk about disablement and what it means to society and the disabling consequence it alludes to all. I will discourse what sightlessness means to society and the societal deductions it carries with it. I will talk about how the stereotypes of sightlessness portrayed by society has defined and classed people into a hapless and meagre category of its ain and how we should non allow society order such negative perceptual experiences unto the blind. I will besides discourse how sightlessness is considered a diverseness marker but that this diverseness should non be perceived in a negative visible radiation because unsighted people are different from the remainder.
The treatment of my essay will first talk about the societal theoretical account of disablement and what it is and take out the assorted facets of it, it will touch on the definition and how this theoretical account relates to the subject of sightlessness. Thereafter, I will talk about my experience with the unsighted individual I have interviewed for this essay and associate my experience with him of what sightlessness and life with sightlessness agencies to him and hoe he deals with the day-to-day challenges of life with it. It will be a critical battle of the interview in concurrence with the societal theoretical account of disablement.
And in conclusion I will reason by reflecting on my experience with of the interview and the interviewee and discourse what I learned, what I thought was alone and my contemplation with the interviewee and how society truly takes clasp of our heads and signifiers certain perceptual experiences for us and we accept it without believing about these perceptual experiences or oppugning it, by our deficiency and ignorance, how we merely purchase in to certain stereotypes and impressions without being critical and explicating our ain sentiments.
Disability is non merely a health- related and medical job. It is a complex phenomenon reflecting the interaction between characteristics of a individual ‘s organic structure and characteristics of the society in which he or she lives. Upon turn toing the diverseness marker sightlessness, the word itself holds many untold negative definitions and significances. The word blind has powerful, negative intensions and stereotypes attached to it. Blindness is perceived as a diverseness marker because people that are blind or visually impaired are different from the remainder of society that are non considered ‘normal ‘ . Harmonizing to Southwell ( 2012 ) , there is a strong desire to look normal, or otherwise behaving in ways that are non recognizably different to the mean norm ( Southwell, 2012 ) .
Socially, blindness holds negative stereotypes and significances attached to it in footings of societal relationships and the in the corporate environment. After the obvious definition of losing or deficiency of sight, the 2nd definition is ‘lacking perceptual experience, consciousness or judgement ‘ ( Oxford English Dictionary ( OED ) online 2011 ) .
Therefore because of such negative definitions and misconceptions with mention to a worldwide survey by the Environics Poll ( 2008 ) , vision loss is the most feared disablement and sightlessness and malignant neoplastic disease are the two most feared wellness conditions ( Southwell, 2012 ) .
For the National Federation of the Blind ( NFB ) , the word ‘blind ‘ is excessively violative, since it implies shame alternatively of equality and portrays the blind as needy and bloody-minded. Thus the message that needs to be driven place is that since sightlessness is non a black feature, a unsighted individual demands to be called a individual who is blind no more than for illustration, an intelligent individual demands to be referred to as a individual who is intelligent ( Bolt, 2003 ) . Therefore society should educate themselves in the sense that blind people are non irrational, invalid and incapable ; society should take it upon themselves to educate themselves about sightlessness and about a unsighted individual ‘s life style, their day-to-day life wonts, gestures and activities so that they know that blind people are absolutely capable, of being independent and they are societal existences that enjoy societal events and activities every bit much as ‘normal ‘ people do.
The major issue of sightlessness is non the deficiency of seeing. The nucleus issue and Southern Cross of the job is the misinterpretation and deficiency of information which exists about blind people and the diverseness marker sightlessness itself. If a blind individual has the right preparation, counsel and chance to go independent, so the diverseness marker is merely considered a physical nuisance ( National Federation of the Blind, 1999 ) .
Attitudes towards handicapped people tend to be negative therefore when accompanied with hapless perceptual experiences, attitudes and biass, the deductions result in the production of hapless public policies which frequently affect the sort of ‘rehabilitation ‘ and occupation preparation blind people receive. These public policies have a snowball consequence in footings of the ways in which people relate to and handle unsighted people. Similarly it besides affects the type of instruction and the quality of instruction blind kids and striplings receive. Celebrated blind people like Stevie Wonder and Ray Charles are educated and successful merely like ‘normal ‘ people and it proves that visually impaired and blind people are every bit diverse as the general population.
The negative stereotypes and misconceptions of sightlessness goes manner back in clip. An old, Middle Eastern adage says, “ when you see a unsighted adult male, kick him. Why should you be kinder to him than God has been? ” ( Maurer, 1989, 1999 ) . From the quotation mark is it rather obvious that sightlessness was perceived as a expletive from God. It is due to the negative perceptual experience that has caused blind people to be discriminated against and victimized for centuries and looked down upon as cursed, useless, delinquent mendicants ( Jerigan, 1973, 1999 ) . History lone focuses on the negative facets of sightlessness and it is these really misconceptions and buildings by past coevalss about unsighted people that society held and still holds ( largely the uneducated ) to do society at big to believe of unsighted people in negative visible radiations. These really negative attitudes therefore let favoritism to happen. To believe of a unsighted individual or people as literate, educated and good versed in society is something wholly foreign and throws one off the common perceptual experiences of unsighted people.
South Africa is normally known as a rainbow state. The label universally refers to the diverse array of race, civilization, gender, age, socio-economic position and faith. The manner South Africa perceives disablement and blind people in peculiar takes on many stances. Disability is a complex class as it has been and still is understood and interpreted by different people in really different ways ( Ghosh, 2012 ) . Harmonizing to Ghosh ( 2012 ) , in most societies and civilizations, persons with physical or rational disablements are defined and perceived by the very nature of their status, inferior. The experience of disablement is mediated by socio- cultural buildings that give significance to damages and act upon the experiences and interactions of handicapped people in different socio- historical contexts ( Ghosh, 2012 ) . These properties besides varies depending on the socio- cultural and socio- economic category of each social group.
The really kernel and differentiation in which sightlessness is considered a diverseness marker is because persons that are blind are different from the remainder of society. Blind persons lead a different life style in that they need aid when going, they need devices and tools to help them when walking like walking sticks and guide Canis familiariss, and they use particular plans to assist them when utilizing the computing machine and aid in utilizing Braille, reading and authorship. Because of these elements of differentness, society perceives the blind and socially constructs them as needy and incapable. Social buildings of sightlessness and blind people have a profound consequence on people with sightlessness as their physical or mental shortages impinge on their day-to-day lived worlds.
In some surveies ( Beaty, 1992 ; Lopez – Justicia et al. , 2001 ) , it has been found that the young person with ocular damages and blindness tend to experience unequal and inferior due to their deficiency of societal credence, academic underachievement and physical disablement. A individual who loses his/her sight undergoes extended behavioural motivational, cognitive and emotional accommodations ( Dodds et al. , 1994 ) . It is basic human nature to socially interact with people and develop friendly relationships. Therefore, harmonizing to Hartup ( 1993 ) , friendly relationship is defined as a relationship that necessitates mutualness and long term stableness and it is fluid in nature through the class of life. Most unsighted people spend their clip in inactive activities like talking on the telephone.
In a survey conducted to seek how credence of disablement impacts on persons, it was discovered that low credence of sightlessness does non needfully reflect denial of its being ( Beaty, 1992 ) . Rather it indicates consciousness of the barriers it causes. With respects to attitudes towards sightlessness, the participants agreed with the claim that most people with ocular damages believe that loss of vision is the worst thing that could happen to them. And every bit far as the credence of the disablement is concerned, participants agreed that ‘the job from non being able to see is that it prevents me from making many things ‘ . Based on the above survey, it is apparent that sightlessness itself is non the issue, it is the bar from prosecuting in undertakings and activities due to blindness that portrays a negative image of unsighted people. Blind people are non mentally incapable unless apparent, but because many are illiterate due to non being taught Braille, society perceives them as mentally challenged and incapable of larning ; a typical illustration of a societal stereotype.
It all boils down to awareness and being educated about disablement and sightlessness. Being cognizant of sightlessness and how to near, reference and talk confidently to a unsighted individual, without thought of them as useless and stupid. In being able to believe about unsighted people as apprehensible existences, one demand to sufficiently be educated about sightlessness and the stereotypes associated with it and finally avoid them. Blind people in bend besides need to be decently educated about their status and disablement so as to educate those that display the typical stereotypes of unsighted people. Dodds et Al. ( 1994 ) , presented a five phase theoretical account for accepting disablement, specifically in this instance sightlessness: authorising self- regard ; making positive attitudes towards sightlessness by having accurate information ; assisting persons to comprehend themselves as holding control over their actions ; assisting persons to accept their disablement and increase their self- efficaciousness. A balanced self-concept will assist the single header with the disablement in the present and the hereafter.
The success of a individual populating with sightlessness mostly will be determined by the attitude of his household and the public toward him as a unsighted individual. A strong support system is critical in get the better ofing any obstruction particularly upon the loss of vision in a immature kid like that of my interviewee. My interviewee is a 21 twelvemonth old male presently enrolled at the UKZN campus, analyzing towards a BSS grade. The interview was conducted on the 23 April 2013. In visible radiation of the replies he shed to some critically analyzed inquiries, I have used the societal theoretical account of disablement to concentrate my critical statement with his replies to as to either relate to or against what the theory says about disablement, specifically in footings of sightlessness.
First, I will discourse the societal theoretical account of disablement. This theoretical account recognizes that disablement is non the result of bodily pathology but is socially produced by systematic forms of exclusion that are built into the societal cloth ( Shakespeare, 1994, Hughes & A ; Paterson, 1997 ) . A physical feature of disablement becomes the nucleus focal point on a individual steeping personal difference and discouraging the individual of normal social battles and interactions. The disablement is socially imposed on physical impaired people through limitations runing from single bias to institutional favoritism, from unaccessible public edifices to unserviceable conveyance systems, from segregated instruction to exclusion on work agreements and environments. All of the above are illustrations of how favoritism is an institutionalised social happening and return ( Oliver, 1990 ) .
Silver ( 1998 ) argues that the inequality visited upon individuals with disablements is rooted in societal patterns that bar them from showing their competency. The handicapped are rated chiefly in footings of their shortages and the receivers of public assistance allotments and organisations. Social want collectivizes the handicapped as a weak category, and patterns are fashioned in such a manner that disablement disqualifies people from entree to civic and commercial goods and services ( Silver, 1998 ) .
The construct of sightlessness as a diverseness should non be aimed at accomplishing a inactive status but alternatively should be a procedure of ever-widening inclusiveness with the bigger purpose of accomplishing the aim that sightlessness as a disablement marker is a merchandise of the interaction between the person and the external environment. The primary jobs for unsighted people are bias, stereotypes, bias and favoritism as public attitudes restrict chance even more than unaccessible installations do.
The societal theoretical account of handicapped individuality exists as a reciprocally sole individuality from all other attitudes because the cultural and media discourses on disablement are influenced by the personal booby trap rule or by images of the utmost instances of the cripple or emotionally bantam handicapped stereotypes. The absenteeism of handicapped function theoretical accounts has added to inequalities and unfairness experienced by handicapped people. We learn our societal individuality through the procedure of socialisation – through interaction throughout childhood and on into maturity. This uninterrupted interaction signifiers our self-perception and besides how we believe we are perceived by others and therefore a societal individuality is developed and formed doing a individual the individual that they are.
The Royal National Institute for the Blind ( 1997 ) depict sight loss as “ an highly distressful experience ” . This gives the feeling that, holding lost their sight, persons now inhabit a different universe from that of the sighted, and that their individuality has changed. Yes, it has changed to a certain extent but society is so focussed on allowing the disablement, in this instance sightlessness get the better of an single and allow it devour the individual that finally, the single lets the stereotypes predict and dominate the destiny and result of the individual ‘s life, that is a regretful province of personal businesss. Thus it can be deduced that we construct our individuality and self- image on the footing of other people ‘s definitions. Society recognizes people as members of a type categorized by gender, category, economic sciences, race, sexual orientation and damage. From the above information it is easy to see how handicapped people, particularly that of blind people fall victims of such malicious biass and prejudices to such an extent that it cripples the person of a confident and strong-minded individuality. The societal theoretical account of disablement further provinces that disabled people have been isolated and hold had small chance to portray their ain experiences within the general non- handicapped civilization because of the interaction between people with disablements and stigmatising societal values and enfeebling societal agreements ( Hahn, 1988 ; Morris, 1992 ) .
I will now discourse the societal theoretical account of disablement in relation to the interview conducted with the unsighted pupil of UKZN.
When I asked the interviewee Ho he defines himself, he stated that he defines himself as a normal individual that is capable of most things that ‘normal ‘ people do but he is non in denial or unmindful to the fact that he has a life-time of challenges in footings of his sight shortage. It is interesting to observe that the interviewee deliberates himself every bit normal as this lends itself into the impression that suggests that the key to success of unsighted people ‘s lives is that even though they have lost their physical oculus sight, they still retain their mental ‘vision ‘ which is mostly comprised of finding, fortitude and doggedness. The blind, peculiarly work forces, enjoy gags about members of their ain group regardless of whether they originate on the humor of their blind co-workers or from their immediate circle of sighted friends. The fact remains that it is a normal societal intercourse for healthy life and unsighted people enjoy these societal norms merely every bit much. This is non parallel to all that I have antecedently spoken about as it does non purchase into the cosmopolitan stereotypes and biass held by society that blind people are incapable and destitute existences that are perceived and bizarre, crabbed existences. This besides goes against the societal theoretical account in that the societal theoretical account dictates that society excludes the handicapped, in this instance the blind from societal interactions, nevertheless, this unsighted single considers himself a normal being so one has no pick but to take into consideration that he is being treated reasonably with no blazing signifier of favoritism by his household, extended household, equals and familiarities.
The interviewee considers himself as visually impaired as opposed to being blind upon the inquiry of which individuality he identifies with. Possibly this lends itself to what was antecedently discussed in that the word blind itself brings about morbid and atrocious images and feelings. The word blind invokes strong negative intensions and feelings of compunction in that one time labeled a blind individual, it means a universe of darkness ; darkness in the sense that society instantly outcasts the person and there are terrible restrictions, socially, economically and in footings of instruction. It brings about feelings of dependence, commiseration and therefore blind people are non defined as persons with their ain involvements, instead they are merely defined by their disablement. This is precisely what the societal theoretical account implies ; that a individual may be impaired for a figure of grounds, but that is merely the clasp in which society dictates that they are handicapped. Hence blind people shy off from the label blind and prefer the term visually impaired as it leaves infinite for societal credence and more chances socially and economically.
When the interviewee was at the stamp age of seven, he started holding sight jobs, while still at primary school. He stated that he invariably had to be near the forepart of the category in order to be able to see the board. It got right up to the point where he had to invariably sit on forepart of the category because of his deteriorating oculus sight. Such experiences is frequently confusing and really traumatic on such a immature person as they are still immature and naA?ve and have much to larn. He said that bit by bit as the hebdomads progressed his oculus sight started decreasing. Psychologically and socially, kids and grownups who are inactive tend to hold negative effects, anxiousness, low self- regard, low assurance and hapless self- efficaciousness ( Morgan, 1994 ) . From a kid who was socially synergistic and athletics inclined to sitting on the bench in a cavity of darkness so to talk of, it is a really confusing and intimidating clip in life.
Upon inquiring the interviewee what had happened thenceforth, he said that after recognizing he was non able to see clearly the written stuff on the board in school, even after several effort of sitting closer to it, he told his parents. They took him to an oculist and he was so diagnosed with ocular damage. He and his household was told that he would bit by bit free his sight as clip went by. In the interim he was given a brace of spectacless with a strong prescription in hopes to urgently help his deteriorating seeing, but since his vision loss was at a rapid gait, the spectacless shortly became of no usage.
He made sense of the difference in that he had a strong support system. he said that his parents truly helped him at his most vulnerable province and that they took him out of his school and put him in an environment he would better be able to get by at, a school for visually impaired and unsighted kids in Pietermaritzburg. He was offered a sound cognition of what was go oning to him by the school counsellor who sought him out and educated him about his status and how to larn to populate with it.
The interviewee stated that the school counsellor explained what was go oning to him and that she played a major function in assisting him adapt to his status. She made him understand that life did non come to a deadlock or terminal and that there were many other persons in his environment sing similar state of affairss. His impression that his life could potentially standstill or halt when he lost his seeing is typical of the societal building and mainstream ideas of the dominant political orientation that life ends where sightlessness begins. Society has a manner of ordering and finding how we feel by the stereotypes and biass created for us, therefore we merely purchase into those stereotypes and do non believe out of the box. The societal theoretical account indicates this much as good in that it is society that regards the disablement as a disablement in that it cripples one and strips one of chance and a life after sightlessness. However the inquiry that needs an reply urgently is why do we purchase into these cockamamie impressions that blindness means the terminal of the universe? And that disablement means being stupid, and images of a fumbling, ill dressed single with a hitch cross our head? It is precisely because society has embedded such images and portraitures via the media of disablement and that a unsighted adult male can non dress himself, he can non eat suitably and neither can he direct himself from point A to be B. it all stems down to deficiency of instruction about that of sightlessness and the life styles of unsighted people. Society is an nescient batch and every bit long as it does non straight impact the life of a individual, people will non trouble oneself to ask about the cause or the predicament of its people.
The interviewee is rather cognizant of his disablement. I think that sightlessness is the most terrible disablement in that you need some signifier of aid one manner or the other. Sight is really of import. You are able to observe gestural linguistic communication, note organic structure linguistic communication, read and grasp constructs that merely the gift of sight will afford you. When the loss of sight occurs, it involves a major life challenge and lifestyle alteration. The interviewee was most reminded of his disablement when he was in demand of traveling, for illustration traveling into town to buy a few goods for him. For a sighted person this is a simple and even enjoyable undertaking but to a unsighted individual this can be a daunting and even frustrating activity as the interviewee relates his experiences to be. Help is required in his instance, and he says that non all people are trusty to travel with and those that normally do travel with him are non ever available, therefore he feels like a nuisance and needy. It is based upon this really fact that society perceives the blind as handicapped, destitute and useless. The societal theoretical account says that disablement is created within oppressive social constructions, in that a individual merely is judged entirely on his disablement and is nil beyond that disablement. This farther indicates that all the stereotypes, biass, prejudices and negative perceptual experiences are tagged into it. Therefore in this visible radiation it is merely but a normal reaction for society to purchase into the ideas that blind people are useless and wholly dependent human existences incapable of being self-sufficing
The obstructions experienced by the interviewee are valid in that he invariably needs aid in analyzing and he feels that the university is non ‘disability-friendly ‘ and does non provide for unsighted people ‘s demands. Since the societal theoretical account buys into the fact that handicapped people are a nuisance, they are merely perceived in a negative visible radiation and that they are incapable and uneducated, it means that universities are loath to take on these pupils particularly unsighted pupils as excess costs will be incurred due to acquiring stuff that is written with Braille letterings. Many lectors besides feel inconvenienced of holding to happen the stuff compatible with mainstream stuff used so as to suit them and their specific demands. The interviewee besides feels frustrated at the fact that there are non athleticss available by the university for unsighted people. He says he was a athletics lover when he was sighted and even when he lost his sight, in his school at Pietermaritzburg, he played blind cricket. Playing athletics made him experience good and active and made him experience happy and good about himself. Harmonizing to Winnick ( 1985 ) , pupils who are blind are less expert to activities like throwing and catching a ball, equilibrating, striking and organic structure spacial consciousness. Peoples that are blind have more organic structure fat, and lower degrees of cardiovascular endurance, all due to small or no physical activities to suit for unsighted people. Again this relates to the societal theoretical account in that society can non gestate the thought that blind people have the demand to play athletics, how is that possible without your sight? Society tends to bury about the other important senses of the organic structure. Sport can be played by hearing and experiencing. Hence, since society can non see the point of unsighted people playing athletics or the demand for them to be physically active, province Torahs and policies neglect and wholly disregard the blind and disabled at big with respects to explicating intercessions and AIDSs to assist the blind fulfill this demand. Society respects blind people as people with no feelings ; experiencing frustrated is a foreign construct to cope to a normal individual with respects to the feelings of a unsighted individual. Because of these uneducated premises of mainstream society, there is a major neutrality of society to concentrate on the basic demands of blind people and particularly that of the unsighted young person!
All unsighted people are bound to confront some kind of bias and ridicule at some phase in their lives. The interviewee said that he experienced bias ; people used to name him “ impumputha ” which means ‘blind individual ‘ in Zulu. He said that he did non appreciate that term at all and that it was largely nescient people about sightlessness that used to name him that. Again with mention to the societal blind theoretical account, society concepts these ideals of how a individual should be and look and if you do non fall under those ideals you are considered unnatural and handicapped. Because sightlessness falls mostly out of context with the societal concept of looking normal, society does non experience the demand to educate them or larn to be sensitive towards blind people in footings of name naming and discourtesy. However, antagonizing stereotypes and misinformation can non be accomplished without a good apprehension of one ‘s status ( sightlessness ) , therefore the unsighted individual needs to cognize his or her status and be able to inform and rectify nescient people about the myths, stereotypes and favoritism of sightlessness and unsighted people. The following inquiry addressed the issue of how he deals with these stereotypes hurtled at him. He responded by stating that he is now a grown, mature single that thinks that the people that do enforce such stereotypes on him are uneducated and therefore cognize none the better than to set him down to do themselves experience better. He therefore merely associates himself with people that do acquire him, that understands him and most significantly that respects him for who he is. He has developed a confident self-identity and does non experience the demand to destruct it by purchasing into the common impressions and misconceptions that the bulk of society particularly the young person readily sponge away. He says that people must accept a personality before go throughing judgements on them.
The interviewee said that stereotypes frequently associated with sightlessness in his experience is that people frequently tend to believe that unsighted people require aid in everything that they do, for illustration when traversing the route, and when mounting up a instance of stepss. Self-pity is a common happening when people observe a unsighted individual that is because of the manner society has portrayed the blind to be. Blind people are perceived of people that hardly able to do it to look after themselves and that every undertaking is a challenge and boring. This all once more stems to the mainstream society being so illiterate and uneducated when it comes to blindness and the life style of unsighted people. Because society perceives blind people as inferior, unable and because unsighted people ( knowing or non ) have a general ‘poor ‘ visual aspect about them that invokes understanding and commiseration from by-standers.
The interviewee has developed a thick tegument in footings of allowing the stereotypes of a unsighted individual affect him. He says that he frequently merely ignores the comments and walks off. Sometimes though he will talk up and state them to travel and educate themselves as unsighted people do non sing on the side of the route to gain a life. He proudly says that he “ is a proud academic ” , and prefers to pass his clip with people that know him and about sightlessness. In footings of the societal theoretical account, because of the cultural and media discourses and portraitures of sightlessness and what a unsighted individual ‘looks ‘ like, people are so consumed and set on these images that they are thrown off guard when they see a well-groomed, well-spoken and educated blind adult male. Besides there are non many blind function theoretical accounts to interrupt these stereotypes that media is inexorable on reenforcing. Society can non grok an apprehensible and ‘normal ‘ looking blind adult male or adult female.
The interviewee feels most proud about his individuality in that by fring his sight and going blind, he feels that ‘s he has been liberated plenty to go independent and cognizant, appreciate life, friendly relationships and to esteem all of world in a holistic manner. He says that he is mature plenty and strong plenty to take on challenges after covering with the major challenge of fring a cherished gift so many people take for granted. Sight.
A big portion of one ‘s societal individuality is built on the footing of the feedback of what society reflects back onto you about yourself. In order to cognize who and what you are, you need to cognize how society perceives you ; nevertheless you should non allow it specify and devour you. Blindness is a disablement and a diverseness marker in that a individual that is blind can non see, can non drive, can non travel to shops without holding some signifier of aid be it in the signifier of a walking cane, a usher Canis familiaris or a sure comrade. A unsighted individual is perceived as different from the remainder of society in that he needs to read a different literature, he needs to pay more attending to his environments, listen more carefully, retrieve more expeditiously than the remainder of normal functional people do. In footings of how unsighted people are perceived in the on the job universe, the perceptual experience is still mostly negative and impacts negatively on a unsighted individual ‘s life and support. They are discriminated against because their disablement is viewed as an added disbursal and incommodiousness to everyone in the company, people have to be more cautious and suiting in the design on the edifices and organize close Alliess with the unsighted individual in order to do certain the work done is decently meted out. Socially, blind people have been stereotyped as being destitute, dependent, and incapable and are frequently looked upon with much understanding and commiseration. Blind people are thought to merely stand out in music and are non recognized as holding any other profession. Blind people are considered hapless, dressed in shreds, sitting on the side of the street imploring for money. These mainstream stereotypes, biass and stigmas are all because of the manner the media has portrayed blind people, and society being lazy and taking all that they media shows for granted as legit, purchase into these stereotypes, box these persons into this negative visible radiation and frisson to believe of them as anything else.
I for one was portion of the ignorant, uneducated young person that did non hold any cognition other than Media ‘s portraiture of unsighted people. Bing a pupil at UKZN, I have come across many a unsighted pupils but have ne’er spoken or befriended one mostly due to the fact that I did non cognize how to near them and neither did I know what to state to them. I think my perceptual experience of unsighted people in cosmopolitan ; ‘normal ‘ people are so used to merely being around normal people and people that are similar to them physically, mentally and emotionally, that we are non socially educated in turn toing a unsighted individual. It is rather sad really. And therefore, because of this clumsiness we feel towards blind people we create barriers between unsighted people so it forms an ‘us versus them ‘ attitude and so accidentally ( and sometimes deliberately ) we buy into the stereotypes that blind people can non pass on decently, that they can non make things for themselves and that they are non abled plenty to educate themselves. I am different my chosen topic in that I am sighted, I am independent, I drive and I am capable of traveling to the stores to purchase things without the aid of a comrade. Apart from being blind, which is a major life altering event with changeless challenges to get the better of on a day-to-day footing, society adds farther force per unit area and favoritism to blind people doing their lives even more hard. It brings to my attending and makes me recognize that society is truly selfish and nescient and self-consumed. What needs to be answered is what benefit does society acquire from roasting this discriminated minority?
I was surprised to detect that the interviewee defined himself as a normal individual when in contrast he is perceived as ‘abnormal ‘ by society. I find it interesting that even though he is cognizant of the stereotypes and stigmas attached to his disablement he is still confident to non undermine in and specify himself as different from the remainder of society. It sheds visible radiation on the penetration of unsighted people in that they truly do non believe that being blind entirely defines who they are and what society can label them as. If anything it proves that they are a determined and alone set of persons that are endeavoring to do a good name and life for themselves if given the chance to make so. It is besides interesting to observe that the interviewee is merely like a normal college child that enjoys temper, merriment and gags. That besides sheds visible radiations into the stereotype that blind people are non crabbed, crabbed and temperamental persons, they enjoy tempers and merriment merely every bit much as any other person does. What I found intriguing is that the interviewee needed aid to analyze. In order to endeavor for independency and a nice instruction, the interviewee is dependent on a sighted individual to assist him to larn and be prepared for trials and tests. In order for that to happen, a unsighted individual demands to hold an unsurmountable sum of trust and religion in the individual chosen to assist him/her survey and do good plenty to go through. Similarly, the ‘teacher ‘ demands to hold a batch of forbearance and dedication to learn the unsighted individual. I find this sort of relationship really interesting and alone. It is profound of the interviewee to believe that being blind did him more good than he expected in that he is much more independent and is educating himself. He is proud of his individuality as a unsighted individual and does non conceal off in shame or fright. It is merely normal for him and blind people likewise to experience defeated and emotional at times because being able to see is a batch better than being unsighted, but the fact that he is persisting and non allowing this disablement get the better of him or convey him down is truly admirable and I think that ‘normal ‘ people can really larn from this and follow a similar attitude.