Ban hunting Essay Example

antlers, and horns. Nevertheless, using financial gain to justify animal suffering is unacceptable as animals have emotions. Hunting asserts that it manages animal populations, but in reality, it is not necessary for controlling deer or fox populations.

While deer can be found across the UK, only some regions permit hunting. However, in areas without hunting like Scotland, the natural balance of competition and disease helps regulate deer populations. Hunting groups use population control as a cover for the killing they do. They assert that their members care about wildlife and the environment, and that they aim for a humane kill with a single shot.

Despite claims to the contrary, it is common for hunts to go on for hours while hounds relentlessly pursue the deer until it is completely spent. Once the deer is unable to continue, the hunters often set dogs on the animal who attack and savage it mercilessly. The hunters show no concern for the animal's suffering and deliberately choose a deer that can prolong the cruel pursuit for hours. They take pleasure in inflicting torture and killing.

A video captured a hunter displaying an injured fox like a trophy and boasting about it to his companions while the fox cried out in agony. The hunter's actions contradict their claims that hunting is humane. The League Against Cruel Sports possesses multiple video clips exposing the truth about hunting – that it is a barbaric practice perpetrated by sadistic killers rampaging across the countryside. Personally, I find using high-capacity rifles to shoot deer equally unacceptable.

Despite the efforts of professional marksmen to minimize animal suffering while hunting, there is still a possibility of severe injury

or death for strong stags. To tackle the issue of large deer populations, introducing wolves would be the most effective solution in my opinion. Unlike hunters who tend to target any deer that can provide a good chase without considering its role in the herd, wolves carefully select only the weakest and oldest members of the group as their prey. Moreover, wolves are native predators in Britain and were historically present until they were hunted to extinction by humans. Therefore, they are well-suited for life in Britain and can serve as a natural control for both deer and fox populations through predation.

Reintroducing wolves in the U.S. was a triumph and I am confident that it can be achieved in the UK as well. The league against cruel sports has compiled numerous videos demonstrating how hunts are barbaric, merciless, and gory.

There are several alarming recordings, including a pregnant deer being chased off a cliff by hounds and a magnificent stag being shot multiple times before drowning in a river. Hunters claim that the dogs do not harm the deer, but various clips show otherwise. In one clip, over six hounds can be seen attacking another impressive stag by biting into its stomach and hip while it fights for survival.

The evidence gathered by brave cameramen risking their safety to infiltrate hunting societies yields graphic images of animal suffering and hunters' apparent enjoyment, providing ample proof that hunting is inhumane, bloody, and cruel. Furthermore, the hunt operates clandestinely, profiting from animal suffering while promoting a deceptive image of a beneficial countryside organization. Attempts to cover hunts are aggressively thwarted, with hunters resorting to violence or threats against cameramen;

their actions demonstrate a callous disregard for animal pain and terror.

In situations where population management is required, the most humane and effective approach is through biological control via predation. However, in our current modern society, it is unfathomable to permit such a barbaric and violent practice to persist. It is imperative that hunting be completely banned in all forms and without delay, as it is an inherently cruel and unethical activity.