A Rhetorical Analysis of FBI-Apple Standoff Essay Example

process. Interestingly, Google's CEO has publicly expressed support for Cook's decision. These reports have been perceived by many iPhone users as a beacon of hope and progress, reassuring them that tech companies are committed to protecting their privacy.

The text discusses the vulnerability of keeping one's data and information in digital storage, highlighting the potential for cyber-attacks. The author prompts readers to reconsider the amount of information they have entrusted to their phones, particularly iPhone users. The use of examples helps the audience grasp the gravity of the situation. Furthermore, the author's credibility is emphasized by mentioning their publication in the renowned newspaper, Guardian.

Gaby Hinsliff, a Cambridge University graduate, has over 12 years of experience as a news reporter for the Daily Mail. In 2000, she joined The Observer as their chief political correspondent and later became their youngest political editor. Gaby has also moderated debates and public conferences for various public and voluntary organizations. In her writing, Gaby Hinsliff (2016) uses easy-to-understand language to ensure readers understand while aiming to be objective.

The author aims to present the news in an unbiased manner by acknowledging all concerned parties. To enhance her credibility, the author incorporates factual information to support the article without imposing a specific viewpoint. This is done through the use of inductive reasoning, where data is presented as evidence. Inductive reasoning involves using facts and statistics to draw conclusions from statements or generalizations. For instance, the article highlights Apple's adherence to a strict commercial element that prohibits dismantling phone security systems, which are crucial for customer trust. Furthermore, the author illustrates Apple's creation of a "Chinese wall" between the company and its clients.

The author

argues that Apple's intention is to safeguard customer data privacy from potential criminals who could exploit any unlocking methods that may emerge. Additionally, the author highlights the endorsement of the White House as a reputable authority that supports the FBI's efforts to access the criminal's phone. This demonstrates that the US government prioritizes victims' rights and the pursuit of justice. These facts provide insight into the standoff and perspectives from various individuals. Through presenting this data, the author intends to prompt readers to question whether they have entrusted significant personal data and trust in their phones, and whether they should reconsider this decision.

However, the facts empower readers to comprehend the article and form their own conclusions.