Cloning Is The Production Of A Group Of Genetically Identical Organisms Essay Example

birth of Dolly the sheep in Scotland.

There is a possibility that scientists will conduct their initial human cloning experiment, which has received public approval after undergoing several tests. This raises moral concerns regarding the ethicality and potential negative consequences associated with human cloning. Different global religions share the belief that humans are created by a higher entity. According to Christian doctrine, God personally shaped Adam and Eve - Adam was formed from dust, and God gave him life by breathing into him, while Eve was created from one of Adam's ribs (Thompson 2).

The two individuals then engaged in sexual reproduction, a method that has been used for thousands of years to produce other human beings. This method implies that humans are brought into existence by God. Although subsequent generations may not be directly created by God, God still plays a role in their creation as they are formed through the divinely ordained process of human reproduction. Many opponents of human cloning argue that it is immoral and has detrimental consequences because it elevates man to the status of a co-creator with God. In other words, it suggests that mankind is attempting to alter the established relationship between the higher Creator and the lesser creation.

According to Ramsey (1966), the passage demonstrates human pride or vanity, using Jesus Christ as an example. The passage emphasizes that God prophesied Jesus' birth on earth before it actually occurred. It is crucial for critics of Christ to recognize him as both a biblical and historical figure, born in the first century AD (Perry 126). Hence, the existence of a cloned human would imply that they were not created with God's

consent. Since humans would be responsible for their creation, mankind would determine their purpose on earth. Consequently, one can infer that "cloned humans are subject to the arbitrary will, power, and manipulation of their human creator" (Haas 1997).

Placing a person in an unfamiliar world arena would be ethically unjust and unfair for the cloned individual. It is commonly accepted that despite our technological advancements, we are still inferior to natural calamities. In essence, humans are much lower than God in terms of intelligence and capability, making it impossible for us to comprehend the reason behind our existence. Nevertheless, we find comfort in the belief that God's immense wisdom guarantees that everything is being managed, including our life experiences. However, this leads to the inquiry regarding the fate of the clone.

Should he simply drift among us without purpose? Human cloning is seen as a violation of human uniqueness, dignity, and wholeness, which is deemed morally incorrect (McCormick 17-24). The value of human life would diminish if we were aware of the ease with which we could replace someone. God places immense significance on human life, so much so that He facilitated the redemption of fallen humanity through the sacrifice of His son, Jesus Christ. When Adam sinned, it affected Him. He could have effortlessly replaced Adam with another individual since He has the ability to create countless others identical to him.

God's action demonstrates the value of human life, making it clear that creating a human being is not something humans should tamper with. However, proponents of human cloning argue that cloning could offer a solution for individuals suffering from heart problems by providing them with an

exact heart match from their clone for transplantation (Kluger 2001). This would be especially beneficial as finding exact organ donors can be extremely challenging, sometimes even impossible. Having a clone available to provide needed internal organs would be a significant advantage.

However, there are ethical concerns surrounding the killing of a clone for organ harvesting. Despite possessing all physical human attributes, including emotions, intellect, and potentially a soul, cloned humans should not be subjected to murder. Scientists also emphasize the need for extensive trial and error in successfully creating a human clone. Animal clones required testing multiple embryos and eliminating those with defects before achieving success. While killing animals may not constitute murder, it is different when humans are involved. Human cloning involves the expected death of numerous embryos during testing, resulting in a tragic loss of innocent lives. Fortunately, we are not the ones undergoing research laboratory studies. In comparison to God's creation of Adam and Eve without any trial and error, otherwise He would be held accountable for murder. Furthermore, human clones will likely encounter various internal challenges.

Initially, individuals may experience a profound sense of purposelessness and lack of meaning in their lives. If human cloning proves successful and they possess the same mental and psychological capabilities as us, they will eventually realize that they are simply a creation of advanced technology. Not being conceived by God, they might perceive themselves as outsiders who do not fit into God's intended plan for naturally born humans. It is natural to question whether they would genuinely undergo such emotions, yet it is worth observing those around us. Many ordinary people have had their lives shattered by

feelings of rejection and emptiness. We all comprehend that life encompasses more than just wealth, beauty, and fame. Numerous prosperous and attractive individuals on Earth have openly expressed ongoing dissatisfaction and an internal void. A substantial number have discovered solace in spiritual pursuits instead of the physical realm.

To guarantee a contented and harmonious human life, possessing significance and intention is imperative. It is highly unethical to generate a cloned human without recognizing God's existence and lacking any confirmation of authentic purpose and meaning. This action will merely contribute to the already abundant number of mentally impaired individuals on Earth, intensifying our ongoing societal problems. Human cloning entails intricate and expensive efforts, demanding the proficiency of scientists, medical experts, as well as state-of-the-art laboratory resources and materials.

The high cost of human cloning only allows the wealthy to afford it, creating a problem. According to Kluger (2001), there are affluent individuals willing to spend large amounts of money on training, controlling, and exploiting human clones for malicious purposes. As a result, human cloning contributes to the proliferation of evil in the world. Deliberately subjecting humans to more evil is morally unjustifiable. Ultimately, the issue of human cloning resembles the discovery of the atomic bomb – while it helped bring an end to World War II (a positive outcome), it also poses a constant threat of annihilating the earth. In the wrong hands, our planet could be destroyed within seconds. This may just be a matter of time.

Overall, not all progress in human technology is beneficial or morally justified in the future. According to God's guidelines, there are limits that we should follow, and going beyond them would

result in moral repercussions.