Video Game Industry Analysis: Nintendo’s Mission Statement Essay Example

an analysis of the leadership personality, traits behaviors, attitudes and perceptions show that they are usually never too quick to judge nor are they very critical of others work.

Instead of seeking perfection from others as it is sought in that of the leaders, Nintendo's management is normally less judgmental of others and they work on motivating them instead of criticizing.A good point that is found at Nintendo is that they are able to take control of a group easily, and are natural leaders. While they are sometimes critical and seek perfection, at the same time they are leaders who try to work with the entire group so that the dynamics flow together rather than individually.

Weaknesses: Not able to support HD(1080p), Inability to meet consumer demand. Limited game titles on Wii. Conflict has been described as the process which begins when one party perceives that the other has frustrated, or is about to frustrate, some concern of his or hers.

This could certainly be the case with Nintendo when it fights a head-to-head battle with Microsoft. The meanings of concerns in this case are the needs, wants and values of Nintendo. Therefore, conflict situations might arise when the needs, wants and values of two parties interfere with one another. Depending on how Nintendo and Microsoft react to conflict it may not be harmful. Indeed, it presents opportunities for situations to be driven forward effectively, particularly in business contexts.

However, according to some people it appears that all reactions to conflict stem from two general impulses:

1. The desire to satisfy personal concerns, which shows itself as assertive behavior,
2. The desire to satisfy the concerns of others, which shows itself
   

in non-assertive behavior. These represent two behavioral dimensions and provide the basis for conflict-handling modes.

These behaviors are further incorporated into the concept built around the idea that people react in one of five basic ways when faced with interpersonal conflict situations; competing, collaborating, compromising, avoiding or accommodating (McKenna 1995).