The Pros and Cons of Euthanasia Essay Sample

patient makes the decision for voluntary euthanasia while another person decides for a mentally incompetent patient in cases of involuntary euthanasia. Active euthanasia involves deliberately ending a patient's life.

Passive mercy killing entails discontinuing medication and allowing the patient to pass away due to their illness. Conversely, active voluntary mercy killing is when a patient seeks a physician's aid in terminating their life, usually by intentional overdose or administering a lethal substance such as morphine.

The topic at hand is self-inflicted harm through euthanasia. Passive voluntary euthanasia involves a patient choosing to end their life by refraining from any treatment that would extend it. A living will serves as an example of this type of euthanasia, where a patient declares their wish for death if they are unable to make decisions.

There exist diverse forms of euthanasia, such as Do Not Resuscitate (DNR) orders that encompass the act of mercifully killing. Nonvoluntary active euthanasia is when the physician or family ends the patient's life kindly in situations where they cannot make decisions, involving an act of killing. Additionally, nonvoluntary passive euthanasia involves inducing death without patient consent.

Many religious individuals oppose the discontinuation of ineffective medical treatment for a patient in an irreversible coma as it is seen as interfering with God's will. This decision by families to withdraw treatment is often cited as an argument against euthanasia, with major religions worldwide holding the belief that one's natural timing and location of death has already been predetermined.

While the Medical Association has long condemned euthanasia for its ethical violations, a recent study featured in the Annals of Internal Medicine (refer to Appendix A) reveals that oncologists - specialists in treating

cancer - decreased their support for assisted suicide and euthanasia by more than 50% between 1994 and 1998.

According to recent research, there is a potential shift in the attitude towards mercy killing among doctors in Great Britain. An approval rate of 54% has been reported for such an act under specific circumstances that may be deemed as 'extreme'. Nevertheless, it remains unclear and unfair to expect medical professionals to determine what constitutes an 'extreme' circumstance.

"Extreme" may have varying interpretations based on personal perspectives. While it could signify an incurable and painless state for a cancer patient, it might hold a distinct connotation for others. A crucial trend is the increasing pressure on healthcare providers to manage expenses.

Due to the absence of medical insurance in America, numerous individuals are impacted, specifically those who are impoverished and belong to minority groups since they cannot acquire pain management services. Consequently, euthanasia could be utilized as a way to control expenses.

Medical professionals may receive monetary rewards from managed-care facilities to discourage treating patients, as managed care prioritizes prevention over treatment. Additionally, the legalization of euthanasia raises concerns that individuals with serious illnesses or disabilities may opt for death instead of long-term medical attention, potentially benefiting doctors financially. This could be considered an option for terminally ill patients in excruciating pain to alleviate their suffering.

Allowing sick individuals to endure excruciating pain against their will is both cruel and inhumane. The right to peacefully end one's own suffering belongs solely to the individual, who controls their own life. Many people seek a death that is dignified.

Individuals suffering from a devastating and terminal illness and facing the loss of

self-respect should be afforded the opportunity to decide how they spend their final moments. This liberty promotes personal control and integrity during times of excruciating hardship.

Euthanasia is not considered suicide and it is not done in private. It involves the support of family and friends as it aims to relieve a person from long and painful suffering upon their request. #Causes for EuthanasiaOn October 27.

In 1997, Oregon put into law the Death with Dignity Act, which permits the voluntary self-administration of lethal medication by terminally ill individuals under prescription from a physician. Appendix B outlines several reasons why people opt for this option. 84% worry about their declining ability to enjoy pleasurable activities, while another 84% fear losing their freedom.

Out of the total respondents, 47% expressed their concern about bodily maps, while 37% were worried about burdening their households. A small percentage of only 26% had similar concerns.

Euthanasia affects not just the individual who will pass away, but also their loved ones who are concerned about inadequate pain relief. The impact of euthanasia extends beyond the individual to their families and friends. Although grief is a natural response to loss and usually doesn't require professional intervention, symptoms that persist for an abnormal amount of time can lead to traumatic grief.

Unnatural deaths, whether overly intense or delayed, including suicide and euthanasia, can elicit severe emotional pain in family members.

Although some people believe that euthanasia can lead to intense emotional suffering, the mourning experienced by loved ones in instances of suicide differs from that following mercy killing. This is due to the fact that in situations of euthanasia, family members have had the chance to

bid farewell, which is not typically possible in suicides.

# CONCLUSION

The probability of a shift in public perception towards mercy killing is low. The existence of advocates, adversaries, and the unconcerned will persist until they encounter it first-hand. This phenomenon persists due to the considerable impact religion continues to have on society.

According to Steward Alsop, there is a time when it is futile to resist the urge to sleep as it is a necessity for a tired adult male.

Bibliography: "Docker."

C. (1996. November). Exit: The Importance of Press Releases.

The Euthanasia website can be accessed at hypertext transfer protocol: //www. mercy killing and was retrieved on January 25, 2009.

Retrieved on January 25, Lisa's article "Euthanasia: Is This a Good Death?" can be found on cc/press.html from November 2001.

In 2009, the Euthanasia website featured a press release from the National Right to Life dating back to 2000. The release is available at hypertext transfer protocol: //www. mercy killing. com/lisa. html with its original and content intact.

On January 25, it was reported that the number of euthanasia cases has decreased by 50% within a four-year period, specifically between October 4 and the present time. This was attributed to the support of cancer specialists towards assisting suicide.

The following information was obtained in 2009 from the Euthanasia website at hypertext transfer protocol:

//www.mercy killing.com/onco.

In February of 2001, the Oregon Health Division disclosed details about people who were aided in their suicide attempts within the state in the year 2000. The data was obtained on January 25, 2009.

The following text is a hyperlinked webpage on Euthanasia:

Visit hypertext transfer protocol: //www. mercy killing. com/oregonstudy. html to learn more about the "Oregon Study" on the topic of euthanasia and physician-assisted suicide.

(2001. November 2001). The different types of euthanasia. Accessed on January 25.

The website, hypertext transfer protocol://www.pregnantpause.org/euth/types.htmSwarte, was created in 2009.

On June 17, 2003, a cross-sectional survey was conducted to examine the impact of mercy killing on the bereaved family and friends. The results of this survey were retrieved on January 25.

The year 2009 is cited on the BMJ website, with a reference to the National Institutes of Health's PubMed Central in the form of a hypertext transfer protocol link.The article with the ID number 166123 can be found at gov/articlerender.fcgi. It references the Unabridged version (5.1.1) of the Unknown Dictionary website. The and their contents remain unchanged.The Dictionary.com website was the source of information on January 25, 2009. The address is hypertext transfer protocol://dictionary.mention. The information was retrieved from this site.

On the Euthanasia website, there is a page titled "Arguments Against Euthanasia" found at com/browse/euthanasiaUnknown and accessed via hypertext transfer protocol: //www. mercy killing.

The website on Euthanasia discusses various arguments against it at hypertext transfer protocol: //www.euthanasia.com/argumentsagainsteuthanasia.html.The website mercykilling.com provides information about reasons for euthanasia on their page titled "reasonsforeuthanasia.html" which was published in 2000.The Euthanasia website was accessed on January 25, 2009, containing information dated October 4. The website's URL is hypertext transfer protocol:

//www and is enclosed within

tags.The webpage "mercy killing.com/onco" is written in Hypertext Markup Language.