The Cloning of Human Beings Essay Example

ethical and a revolutionary concept in the human beings generation (DeGrazia, Mappes, & Ballard, 2010). Since these are instruments of mass influence, it is correct to argue that the proponents of human cloning have used theses avenues since the issues are now not receiving criticism as it did 25-30 years ago.

Kass further outlines the human cloning associated with other new practices in human production. These practices according to his argument are also unethical. These methods include in vitro fertilization, the manipulation of the embryo and surrogate mothers (DeGrazia, Mappes, & Ballard, 2010). These practices are not only limited to human production but have also extended to other animals where the methods include animal biotechnology and transgenic animals (DeGrazia, Mappes, & Ballard, 2010).

Cultural changes in different societies over the years make it difficult to address some of the issues in human production respectfully. The society has been influenced into believing that concepts such human sexuality, procreation and the nascence of life are complicated to understand which might require some elements of technological involvement, which changes these ideas significantly. He further argues that the meaning of fatherhood or motherhood has been distorted with the concepts such as human cloning which directly represents broken links between generations (DeGrazia, Mappes, & Ballard, 2010).

The technological changes are affecting the natural boundaries which have existed for several years with the introduction of concepts such as the human cloning and embryo manipulation. The variations in the natural limits of life have noticeable effects and consequences on the moral boundaries which he further claims are up for grabs (DeGrazia, Mappes, & Ballard, 2010). With such changes in the natural and moral boundaries, it

is increasingly becoming difficult to make a persuasive yet a compelling case against human cloning. The changes disrupt the normal human life processes like procreation which he further claims turns people into beastlike creatures with no sense of humanity or intimate relationships between them. Kass claims are valid if we consider them from morality or ethical grounds. The issue of human cloning disrupts the normal human life.

Issues of human cloning should not be handled with complacency by the National Bioethics Advisory Commission. The concept may be continuous with past reproductive technologies but when examined from the biomedical ethics viewpoint, it present new and radically new perspectives regarding both foreseeable and unforeseeable consequences. The process of human procreation according to Kass is a question of whether it is going to remain human after all the technological advancements in human tissues and cells modifications (DeGrazia, Mappes, & Ballard, 2010).

From the views of different biological scientists, the process of reproducing children in the future is now hanging in the balance. Various biomedical ethics researchers claim that with the ongoing technological advancements in human cloning and the soft spot offered by the commission, the issue of children will be a question of how they are scientifically made rather than how they are begotten (DeGrazia, Mappes, & Ballard, 2010). It is also going to be an issue of whether it is right or wrong to the road leading to the dehumanization rationality resulting into a brave new world. When the matter of human cloning is raised, it is business as usual with the concerned ethics regulatory authorities not giving it serious considerations and thoughts. According to Kass however, the human

race should be afraid of such advancements since it is threatening the whole concept of humanity (DeGrazia, Mappes, & Ballard, 2010).

The arguments presented by Kass regarding human cloning in, conclusion, should concern anybody who is interested in the ethics and morality of the human race. The concept is slowly breaking generational links, with children being viewed as manufactured rather begotten. The National Bioethics Advisory Commission should take appropriate actions to curb the practice before it gets out of hand. Steps they can take include giving the people the right information about the issue of human cloning and restricting experimentation on the human specimen.

References

1. DeGrazia, D., Mappes, T., & Ballard, M. (2010). Biomedical Ethics (7th ed.). New York: McGraw-Hill.