Which of the following things should leaders know in order to use FIEDLER’S CONTINGENCY THEORY of leadership?

First, the leader should know whether he or she has a relationship-or task oriented style. Second, the leader should diagnose the situation and determine whether leader-member relations, task structure, and position power are FAVORABLE or unfavorable. More test answers on https://studyhippo.com/man-4164-fsu-chapter-3-53369/

The general point of Fiedler’s contingency theory of leadership is that they best style of leadership is determined by

The situation in which a leader works More test answers on https://studyhippo.com/ch5-contingency-and-situational-leadership-53451/

The general point of Fiedler’s contingency theory of leadership is that the best style of leadership is determined by

the situation in which a leader works. More test answers on https://studyhippo.com/leadership-chapter-5/

According to Fiedler’s contingency theory of leadership, in situations of intermediate favorability, a relationship-oriented leader?

may be moderately well liked and have some power. More test answers on https://studyhippo.com/man-4164-fsu-chapter-3-53369/

_____ is based on the premise that effective leadership depends on a match between leadership style and situational demands. Max Weber’s bureaucratic theory Robert House’s path-goal theory of leadership Frederick Taylor’s scientific management theory Fiedler’s contingency theory of leadership

Fiedler’s contingency theory of leadership More test answers on https://studyhippo.com/exam-2-ch-9-study-questions-53187/

The early research on leadership traits was referred to as the a. contingency theory of leadership. b. path-goal theory of leadership. c. great man approach. d. situational theory of leadership. e. behavioral approach.

c. great man approach. More test answers on https://studyhippo.com/chapter-11-leadership-2-53443/

The Vroom-Yetton-Jago Model is another name for the: a. contingency theory of leadership b. trait theory of leadership c. situational theory of leadership d. path-goal theory of leadership e. normative decision theory

e More test answers on https://studyhippo.com/mgmt-ch-14-52942/

Home Page Arts And Humanities English Linguistics Contingency Theory Of Leadership

Contingency Theory Of Leadership Flashcards, test questions and answers

Discover flashcards, test exam answers, and assignments to help you learn more about Contingency Theory Of Leadership and other subjects. Don’t miss the chance to use them for more effective college education. Use our database of questions and answers on Contingency Theory Of Leadership and get quick solutions for your test.

What is Contingency Theory Of Leadership?

The Contingency Theory of Leadership is a theory that argues that effective leadership is dependent upon the specific situation. The theory states that there is no single best style of leadership, and instead suggests that the most appropriate style must be matched to the particular context or situation at hand. The theory looks at various factors such as the leader’s personality, their experience, and the organizational environment. It then recommends an appropriate leadership style for the specific context.The contingency approach to leadership was first proposed by Fred Fiedler in 1967 and has since been developed by other theorists such as David Campbell and Richard Boyatzis. At its core, this theory emphasizes a leader’s ability to adapt their behavior based on different contexts or situations they may face within an organization or team. This adaptability allows them to adjust their strategy in order to best meet the needs of those they are leading at any given time.The Contingency Theory utilizes two main concepts: Leader-Member Relations (LMR) and Task Structure (TS). These two elements help define how successful a leader can be within any given situation by determining how much influence they will have over their subordinates, what types of resources are available, and how structured or unstructured tasks are conducted within an organization or team environment. LMR measures how close a relationship exists between leaders and followers while TS indicates how clear tasks are defined for employees as well as what resources are available to complete said tasks successfully. In practice, both concepts must be taken into consideration when choosing which type of leadership approach would best suit any given situation.