Religion View On The Act Of Mercy Killing Essay Example
Religion View On The Act Of Mercy Killing Essay Example

Religion View On The Act Of Mercy Killing Essay Example

Available Only on StudyHippo
  • Pages: 6 (1553 words)
  • Published: April 18, 2022
View Entire Sample
Text preview


The world view according to Baha'I religion, no one is allowed to take their individual life as they say that every person should understand the importance of the physical life in this world and the teach against the fear of death. They grouped their pedagogy in terms of the importance of love, without fear of death, the essentiality of physical life on earth, a belief in the sacredness of human nature, and an emphasis on displaying such positive values as love, equality, individuality, unity, and peace, something viewed by Baha'ism as being relevant to all religions and rising above specifics of doctrines and sectarianism. Negative experiences according to Baha'i's writings are the concern of the effect of suicide (Smith, 2015).

The Christians worldwide view that is th


at the life itself is holy and no individual under whatever circumstance is allowed to take it or take any others person's life. In Christians teaching, it is only God that has the power to give and take the life. The Bible states that in case a person takes his or her life, they have committed a sin against the God, and they are to face hell. The Christian views that the life we have is not our and that we hold no authority to make any decision on it. They believe that God takes the life when He wants and can put it at suffering for as long as the individual will take to change but the test is always within the limits of the individual’s capability.
The nursing beta paradigm states that with God in the Christian worldview, God created the world to mean environment, to mean also includ

View entire sample
Join StudyHippo to see entire essay

everything, created human man being to present person and set them within the environment to live in shalom with present health. The health allows the people to live in peace with God in the society with the physical, spiritual and psychological well-being. Nursing then comes in between the shalom within the individual community. (Conway, 2015).

What we accept about God shapes our comprehension of human people and the earth in which we get ourselves. That, in, illuminates our idea of wellbeing and guides us to the methods by which we support each other toward wellbeing and recuperating. So as Christians, we start with a theology of nursing more than a rationality or hypothesis. On the off chance that we genuinely accept what we say. We accept about God; we want to act in submission to him, which implies imparting the uplifting news of salvation, wellbeing, and mending through word and deed (Conway, 2015).

This struggle affects the practice of the nurses in a positive way. It is logical to live knowing that there are some extra powers that can help an individual to overcome certain situations especially for the case of their work. The link allows the nurse to understand their limitation as human beings and the power of the God in their work. The miracles they experience from the recovery of their patients is a sign of these super natural being.

It is applicable in the case of George where the sickness is expected to last for about the duration of five years. The many cases, the unexpected happens and that what is expected comes to pass without notice. It is possible for George to recover from

his sickness without the hospital treatment. (Florovsky, 2014).

In this case, both the religions accept that suffering is part of the individual and that and that it only makes a person strong. In the case of George suffering, both the religion accept the suffering and are sure that at the end of the suffering, George will have the reward. It is possible for every person to suffer and they both state that suffering is God's way of making people to identify their weakness and make an improvement. According to their view, the God never gives someone temptation that they cannot overcome. It is probable that there is an explication for George's suffering (Florovsky, 2014).

In the religious view, George is suffering too much in the human view, but according to the teachings, the rate of his suffering is compared less with what the Christian call the suffering of Jesus. The rate of suffering is also compared to the rate at which the individual might have gone wrong against the God.

In the view of the both religion, George's view of own life is compared sacred and that George should have the capacity to accept his suffering and accept the reality of life. The way George view his life is what the Christian call to lose hope and lack faith in God. The Baha'I religion talks about the need of courage and without fear. They talk about the risk of committing suicide in an individual and the need to understand the important of physical life. (Florovsky, 2014).

The value of life with ALS according to George is too much suffering for an individual to the extent that he cannot withstand.

The religious view is that, the suffering is normal and that every individual is given the amount of suffering. The religious view for life of George in the ALS indicates that life the George thinks is his actually belongs to God and that he can still live for longer than the expected until the day God will say enough is enough. In conclusion, both the religious and the nurses accept the reality of powers of the super natural powers and their work.

In both death and dying there is the end of life. Interestingly, the two differ in that death is the end of life while the later; dying, is approaching death via choices and actions that lead to death. In this case the case of George death will be through the actions and processes leading to death. Euthanasia is one of the actions that lead to death. In the process of euthanasia or mercy killing a patient’s life is painlessly ended in cases where the disease is too painful or a patient is in an irreversible coma. In the case of George his medical condition is incurable and it will require him to live under life support and thus the reason he opted for euthanasia.

Religion has a different view on the act of mercy killing. Both Christianity and Sikhism refer to euthanasia as being ethically wrong. Life is sacred and only God should end it through death and not human through dying. Christian refers to life as a sacred gift from God, it thus holy and should not be tampered with. Sikhism on the other hand refers to human suffering as being part of a

plan in human life. However in the case of George Christians value life but they ought to put into consideration the pain and suffering that George will have to go through. The Sikhs though highly valuing life will have to consider Georges pain and thus though it is not ethically right they will have to give in to euthanasia.

George’s condition requires quick action since the condition is positive and its side effects are too painful for him. To consider what is right and just for George Christian will put the considerations first. In that they will consider the fact that George will be suffering under this condition thus putting this considerations first it will be moral for them to allow the patient undergo mercy killing thus avoiding a further suffering on his life. Sikhs on the other side considering the suffering that George goes through will thus treat euthanasia as being moral. Therefore both religions will opt for euthanasia given the painful conditions that George will go through if allowed to survive.

However, my personal view on euthanasia is that it should be allowed in cases where patients are really suffering. Like in the case of George, the patient is set to be going through harsh conditions in his life that will require him to be supported to leave. For example George will require so much attention from his family members. He will use a lot of money to ensure that he continues breathing. Though different religions are against euthanasia, it ought to be legalized as it’s a way of helping the patient and his people.

In summary, euthanasia has being used to bring to an end

suffering from different life conditions that are irreversible or painful to the patients. Religion on the other hand treats life as holy and thus they fail to support euthanasia. However, due to circumstances and conditions of the patients the religions have been forced to treat euthanasia as being moral to be performed on patients. Therefore, in performing euthanasia the patient’s condition becomes the most important consideration to be made


  1. Conway, M. E. (2015). Toward greater specificity in defining nursing's metaparadigm. Advances in nursing science, 7(4), 73-82.
  2. Dosenrode-Lynge, S. Z. (2009). Christianity and resistance in the 20th century: From Kaj Munk and Dietrich Bonhoeffer to Desmond Tutu. Leiden: Brill.
  3. Florovsky, G. (2014). Christianity and culture (Vol. 2). Nordland Publishing Company. Huxtable, R. (2013). Euthanasia. London :
  4. Smith, P. (2015). The Babi and Baha'i Religions: From Messianic Shiism to a World Religion. Cambridge University Press.
  5. Sorajjakool, S., Carr, M. F., & Nam, J. J. (2011). World religions for healthcare professionals. New York: Routledge.
Get an explanation on any task
Get unstuck with the help of our AI assistant in seconds