Mr.Green, Crime and Bullying Essay Example

address the bullying behavior of Chester towards Green.

e) Susan Gray is also accused of misdemeanor for intentionally encouraging the ongoing bullying of Green by consistently giving money to Green for lunch, knowing that Chester would take it from Green's parents.

4) The new statutory laws restrict police involvement within school grounds, allowing it only in extreme situations. School resource officers and specially hired police officers are responsible for ensuring the safety of schools and would have made any necessary arrests in this case.

5) The two teachers neglected their responsibility as educators by failing to prevent the escalation of this incident. Their failure to report the incident to the principal and address Chester's behavior demonstrated their inability to fulfill their duties effectively. They mishandled the situation, which fell under their jurisdiction of responsibility. If they felt incapable of handling the situation, it was still their duty to inform the principal for further intervention.

According to Durant (6), it is important for teachers to ensure the safety of all students, punish those who behave inappropriately like Chester, and fulfill their teaching responsibilities. They have indeed fulfilled these obligations. This is in accordance with a law that states any evidence obtained or analyzed in violation of the defendant's constitutional rights would not be admissible in court. This rule applies specifically to federal courts due to the Fourth Amendment, which ensures due process. In this case, as the principal, the teachers could face consequences such as a maximum two-week salary fine and receive briefings from school management regarding their duties according to school regulations and policies. It is crucial for them to be extra

vigilant in their duties to prevent future incidents since the penalties will vary.

Chester will be suspended from school for two weeks and will be placed on probation upon his return. His behavior will be closely monitored and his parent must accompany him to school daily. Regular checks for dangerous weapons or drugs will also be conducted. Green, on the other hand, will receive a warning about bringing weapons to school and will have close teacher supervision. Both defendants and juveniles involved in the incident will face different punishments (Tedeschi & Elizabeth 3).

Green will face a fine of $1000 for possessing dangerous weapons on school property, as well as a maximum sentence of 60 days for refusing arrest, violent misconduct, and carrying arms with the intent to cause harm. His ammunition will be confiscated until he can demonstrate responsible usage. For Mrs. Nancy Witmore and Miss Susan Gray, they will be required to complete three weeks of community service, attending to available duties, and their school will enforce policies to address teachers who neglect their responsibilities. Juveniles will undergo a special hearing in juvenile court to determine appropriate punishment for their actions (Tedeschi & Elizabeth 3).

9) To protect schools from disruptive parents and other guests, school guards and metal detectors should be installed at all entry points. This measure will prevent the illegal entry of weapons into schools and can effectively monitor students and visitors on school grounds (Durant 6). It is important to note that this is not considered a terrorist act, as the necessary conditions for such a classification have not been met in this specific situation.

The involvement of the FBI and DEA

is unnecessary in this case since no one was injured and the crimes can be handled by the police and school authorities (Johnson et al. 14) .

Works Cited

• Johnson, James L., and Laura M. Baber. "State Of The System: Federal Probation And Pretrial Services." Federal Probation
• Tedeschi, Frank, and Elizabeth Ford. "Outliers In American Juvenile Justice: The Need For Statutory Reform In North Carolina And New York." International Journal Of Adolescent Medicine And Health DURANT, AIMEE A. "Two Years In Limbo: North Carolina's Inconsistent Treatment Of Sixteen- And Seventeen-Year-Olds."
• Wake Forest Journal Of Law & Policy 5.(2015): 531. LexisNexis Academic: Law Reviews.

Web