Morse V. Frederick Essay Example

not always as immediately obvious.

As we have recognized in the past and as the opinion of the Court today details, illegal drug use presents a grave and in many ways unique threat to the physical safety of students. I therefore conclude that the public schools may ban speech advocating illegal drug use. But I regard such regulation as standing at the far reaches of what the First Amendment permits. I join the opinion of the Court with the understanding that the opinion does not endorse any further extension.

The holding in the case of Morse v.Frederick is limited because of its limited drug context. The following are the holdings is it goes no further than hold that a public school may restrict speech that a reasonable observer would interpret as advocating illegal drug use and it provides no support for any restriction of speech that can plausibly be interpreted as commenting on any political or social issue, including speech on issues such as ‘the wisdom of the war on drugs or of legalizing marijuana for medicinal use.The final decisions stated Supreme Court reversed the Ninth Circuit on somewhat narrow grounds, saying that the phrase “Bong Hits 4 Jesus” specifically advocated illegal drug use, the unfurling of the banner was close enough to be considered to be at a school-sponsored activity, and that Morse was allowed to censor the banner. They made this decision because the sign Franklin made didn’t hurt anyone.

It also violated his rights. Although the sign was not for a good cause but he has a right to show his opinion in a non violent way.I think the dissent will say that

Joseph Frederick is wrong. They will say this because a sigh having "Bong Hits 4 Jesus,” because it doesn’t send a right messenger to him.

Not really to him but to the community it talks about Marijuana not outside but in school without permission from a school official, It is like leaving the class without permission from the teacher. I agree with the opinion of the court. I think this because the fourth amendment protects him. Also Frederick isn’t doing any harm to society and the community. It conveys a harmful messenger but doest do any harm.