International satndard Essay Example

technological or geographical problems. Furthermore, joining Schroeder in his point of view, Wisdom, Mcdaniel, and Sugar maintain the significant idea that international standards can be defined as rules affording greater flexibility for both the exporting and importing countries.

They argue the existence of these standards can reduce trade barriers, because each ember country tries to establish its own regulation under international regulation, which prevents a gap too big between regulations of two different countries Schroeder, Humblers Gauzing, Definition of the concept 'International Standard' in the TAB Agreement, Journal of World Trade, Volume 43(6), pappy (32), 2009. (2) Wisdom, Erik and McDaniel, Divine, Improving Regulatory governance : international standards and the WTFO TAB Agreement, Journal of World Trade, Volume 47(5), pappy (34), 2013. 3) Sugar, John G, Harmonistic of International Standards, heaper 20 from Ensuring Global Food Safety, IPPP-351, 2010. In addition, horizontal of regulations promote the establishment of a common benchmark.

Schroeder and Sugar explain that this common benchmark allows reducing a significant 1 OFF imported product in compliance with their own laws. International standards are thus well established to improve trade and reduce unnecessary barriers.

The process of their implementation: Schroeder explains that the decision-making process starts with a proposal stage where an international organization recognizes that an international standard is a deed in a particular area. A preparatory stage is then implemented, which means a working group is formed to prepare a working draft that will be the basis of future international standards.

After that, members get together to review the working draft.

Before being submitted to all organization members to the final vote in the approval stage, the working draft circulates among members for

further comments and improvements: it is the inquiry stage. Once the final draft international standard is adopted by all organization members, it is published by the organization's Secretariat. While Schroeder focuses on its technical decision-making process, Wisdom, McDaniel, and Sugar delve their analysis of what is the international standard by explaining basic principles used to create it.

Indeed, the founding organizations of international standards rely on principles such as transparency, openness, impartiality and consensus, effectiveness, relevance, and coherence.

As an example, the authors explain transparency principle means information used in the decision- making process are available for consultation by all WTFO members, whereas the openness principle promotes participation in an international standardizing organization to all WTFO members and not only to one type of country.

In their articles, they then highlight impartiality and consensus are also privileged because international standards should be not established to favor only one country. Finally, in order to respond to market needs, international standards have to be effective, relevant but also coherent, which means being in accordance with pre-existing standards. Furthermore, whereas Sugar only focuses on the advantages produced by the Romanization of international standards, Wisdom, McDaniel, and Schroeder delve their analysis by raising the gaps in the process.

First, Schroeder, Wisdom, and McDaniel notes that the implementation of international standards can lead to an imbalance between developing countries and other countries. Indeed, because of their low representation within international organizations, developing countries participate very weakly to the creation of international standards. Their requirements and their needs are not taken into account. They then point out that despite the fact hat experts have to use only their neutral knowledge to establish

international standards, their self-interested national interest can sometimes be stronger.