History Should Vindicate David Cameron Essay Example
History Should Vindicate David Cameron Essay Example

History Should Vindicate David Cameron Essay Example

Available Only on StudyHippo
  • Pages: 3 (570 words)
  • Published: May 9, 2022
View Entire Sample
Text preview

In this editorial, the editorial board draws a verdict that does vindicate the actions of the Prime Minister of Britain by blaming his leadership in failing to foresee the end result of a referendum that ended up in Britain pulling out of the European Union. The overall tone running through the editorial is one which vindicates the actions and inactions of Cameron by presenting forth the probable alternatives he might have chosen so as to circumnavigate the people’s power of the ballot in addressing the issues among them European discontent from being duly exercised. It is in this very matter the editorial board failed in recognizing that Britain’s historical woes were not solely anchored on the decisions made by Cameron in allowing the people to choose the fate of the country through a popular vote. This action would in the fo


reseeable future be regarded as a memorable decision that was taken by Cameron come what may by allowing the people exercise the liberties and freedoms they are allowed constitutionally in the event of being faced with a discourse that is larger than the political class. Most of the premises used by the editorial board when reexamined using the convergent argument type implicate the editorial board of building weak arguments that will be laborious in defending the arguments presented forth. For instance, the persuasion presented forth in the arguments that it was catastrophic for Cameron to allow for the referendum instead of using the members of parliament is disenfranchising to state the least because the editorial board failed in presenting all the angles of actions and inactions would have resulted in reinforcing one form of power

View entire sample
Join StudyHippo to see entire essay

while abandoning the other.

This kind of unbalanced presentation of premises implores that the article lacs completeness in its analysis of the subject matter. The arguments of the editorial board regarding the subject are clear, easy to understand and have a flow that can be retraced by a reader following through. However, there seems to be a clear path of the premises in the manner in which they have been articulated due to the kind of structuring they have been arranged. Some of the premises, if left for their independent support would easily crumble down.

This is true due to some sentences seeming to convey contradicting tones unlike the other.In the consideration of the relevance of the whole subject matter in relation to body paragraphs, an evaluation of the impact of the article’s soundness about the reality of the circumstances that would befall Britain seems to be in point and clear. Moreover, the credibility of the board’s stances regarding what future historians, as well as political history would likely be, is well extrapolated from the circumstances and careful analysis of the implications which Cameron did serve to his country. In a general concluding tone, the attempt made by the Bloomberg editorial blog towards penning down the vindication of Cameron based on the referendum results, casts Cameron as a failed leader. However, it is in this sentiments that I consider, a careful introspection would in deed show that Cameron was not a failed leader but one who acted with the light that he had towards serving his people thus making him not to be vilified of his decision but rather triumphed in allowing people decide their destiny, for

better for worse.


  1. https://www.bloomberg.com/view/articles/2016-07-14/history-should-vindicate-david-cameron
Get an explanation on any task
Get unstuck with the help of our AI assistant in seconds