Tess of the D’Urbervilles and The French Lieutenant’s Woman Essay Example
Tess of the D’Urbervilles and The French Lieutenant’s Woman Essay Example

Tess of the D’Urbervilles and The French Lieutenant’s Woman Essay Example

Available Only on StudyHippo
  • Pages: 5 (1190 words)
  • Published: October 10, 2017
  • Type: Essay
View Entire Sample
Text preview

In Victorian society, it might be anticipated that women would be portrayed as mere decorative objects, owned first by their fathers and then by their husbands, with little agency in orchestrating their own lives. However, both Tess and The French Lieutenant's Woman present numerous female characters who defy this stereotype to varying degrees. One distinction between these two novels lies in the quantity of main female characters featured in each.

In Tess of the D'Urbervilles, there are primarily two main female characters: Tess herself, whose journey is followed throughout the novel, and Mercy Chant, who plays a smaller role. On the other hand, The French Lieutenant's Woman features four significant female characters: Ernestina, Charles' soon-to-be wife, Sarah, the title character, Mrs. Poultney, a wealthy older woman, and Mary, Ernestina's maid. The description 'Ernestina had just the ri

...

ght face for her age' gives us valuable insight into Charles' intended bride.

She embodies the typical Victorian woman, as Charles characterizes her as "[a] pretty little thing, yet a shallow little thing." Although she recognizes that society's expectations for her are unexciting, her aspiration to be "something exciting, like a dancer" denotes her strictly Victorian desires. The mentioning of her death coinciding with Hitler's invasion of Poland clearly establish her as a product of the Victorian era. Tess Durbeyfield exemplifies the definitive "independent woman" – while many Victorian women feel incomplete without a partner, she finds contentment in living on her own.

However, Mrs. Poultney's independence and refusal to be tied down ironically make her more attractive to men, adding to the irony of her life. I believe that she embodies Charles' doubts and fears about his relationship wit

View entire sample
Join StudyHippo to see entire essay

Ernestina. Deep down, he worries that Ernestina may turn out to be like Mrs. Poultney- a sad and dull woman who finds pleasure in terrorizing those who work for her. Sarah, the French Lieutenant's woman, is an intriguing character. Initially, we see her in a situation similar to Tess; someone who had her virginity taken by a man she did not love.

As the novel continues, it becomes clear that Tess' tragedy is imposed upon her, while Sarah willingly embraces shame. Money played a significant role in the lives of Victorian women. Ernestina's tragedy reflects the views held during that era. In Victorian society, individuals who earned their money through business were considered inferior to those who inherited their wealth. This concept may seem peculiar, as someone who works hard to earn their money should be deserving of more respect than someone who is simply given it.

Ernestina's grandfather works as a draper, implying that she is not of noble birth and that her inheritance will be considered tainted. Due to this circumstance, she is thrilled about marrying Charles and becomes even more bitter when Charles loses his uncle's inheritance and eventually falls out of love with her. Both Tess and Sarah come from impoverished families, which continues to haunt them in the future. Alec D'Urberville attempts to assist Tess's destitute family in order to win her affection. The fact that these two self-reliant women are economically disadvantaged makes it relatively easier for men who desire to possess them.

One of the key distinctions between the two novels is the hundred-year time divide. In writing The French Lieutenant's Woman, John Fowles had the advantage of reflecting on and

assessing Victorian society from a historical standpoint. He was able to draw connections between the 1800s and his own era. In fact, a significant irony in Fowles' novel is that despite Sarah being inherently free-spirited, she is born and confined within a narrow-minded and hypocritical society. Fowles suggests that if Sarah had been born in the socially progressive 1960s, her spirit would have been fulfilled.

Both Tess and Sarah, who come from impoverished backgrounds, have received a good education, which is evident in their intellectual depth. However, Ernestina, the daughter of a wealthy businessman, lacks the same level of maturity and depth in her thoughts. This suggests that although Ernestina may have received a more expensive education, she has led a sheltered life without the experiences that Tess and Sarah have had.

The theme of evolution is highly significant in The French Lieutenant's Woman. Initially, Sarah appears to be comparable to Tess. However, she ultimately reveals herself to be distinctly dissimilar. Similarly, Charles and Ernestina both possess superficial qualities at the outset. A crucial aspect of the novel is Charles' ability, as a man, to develop and improve, unlike Ernestina, who is constrained by societal limitations placed on women. The role of women in Victorian society primarily revolved around their involvement in personal relationships.

Their mission was to locate a wealthy gentleman, wed him, and ensure his contentment. This man was revered as almost divine to them, and they acknowledged that in order to maintain his happiness, they must fulfill his every desire. Ernestina and Mercy Chant serve as prime examples of this submissive role. The way men perceived women in marital unions contrasted significantly. Alec D'Urberville desired

Tess to be his adoring homemaker, responsible for cooking, cleaning, engaging in conversation, and engaging in intimate activities when requested. Similarly, Charles viewed Ernestina as a mere decorative object.

These two men share the belief that women are merely objects to be owned, much like the fine mansion and horse and carriage that a Victorian gentleman should possess. Owning a wife, preferably one with a substantial inheritance and a noble title, is seen as an essential status symbol for these men in Victorian society. The statement 'Charles was like most men of his time; he simply couldn't believe that any woman could, in any way, actively enjoy lust' sheds light on the nature of relationships during this era.

The concept of ownership is revisited, questioning why an item would take pleasure in fulfilling its natural functions. The only relationship in both novels that could be deemed favorable by contemporary standards is the one between Sam and Mary. Oddly enough, this uncomplicated and passionate relationship is disapproved by outdated remnants of Victorian society such as Mrs. Poultney, who view it as 'contrary to God's desires'. Both dominant and submissive female characters are present throughout the novels.

In both novels, Tess and Sarah strive for dominance, but the men in their lives impose enough pressure on them to make them more submissive. Similarly, Ernestina and Mercy Chant tend to be passive in their relationships, though Ernestina transforms into a more dominant figure after Charles abandons her. Ironically, it is the assertive women who ultimately suffer as victims in both stories. Moreover, the fact that the women in both books are primarily defined by their relationships with others raises a compelling

question: do their characters flourish or decline as a result of this portrayal?

In summary, Tess and Sarah's lives end tragically, while Mary is the only one who finds happiness with Sam. This suggests that the women's fate is closely tied to their relationships with men. Both authors seem to suggest that a woman cannot create her own happiness and fortune.

Get an explanation on any task
Get unstuck with the help of our AI assistant in seconds
New