Regulation and Pizza Hut Essay Example

potentially adopting an exemption, and possibly facing legal challenges in federal courts. It is anticipated that this procedure will take a considerable amount of time (For further information on this process, refer to Chapter 10). Initially, Pizza Hut attempted to obtain a USDA exemption without adhering to the administrative procedure but was not successful.

Pizza Hut collaborated with Congress to include a provision in a 1991 agriculture bill, which aimed to allow school cafeterias to buy fresh pizza without USDA inspection. The amendment instructed the USDA to create regulations by August 1992 that would enable the sale of fresh meat-topped pizza to public and private institutions. Representative Dan Glickman, who represented Wichita where Pizza Hut was located, voiced his dissatisfaction with the USDA regulation, describing it as "a Byzantine, outdated and, quite honestly, an anti-competitive regulatory structure."

Either interest group politics or a public policy process influenced the resolution of the issue at hand, taking into account costs and benefits. The opposition claimed that granting an exemption would be a health risk. Pizza Hut countered by stating that pre-cooked toppings like pepperoni had already undergone inspections during processing and slaughter. These arguments did not heavily impact the decision, except to convince Congress members that fresh pizza sold to institutions was not a health hazard. Ultimately, interest group politics played a significant role in resolving this issue, with Pizza Hut and other fast-food chains supporting the exemption while frozen pizza interests opposed it.