Corn Law DBQ Essay Example
Corn Law DBQ Essay Example

Corn Law DBQ Essay Example

Available Only on StudyHippo
  • Pages: 4 (892 words)
  • Published: July 19, 2018
  • Type: Essay
View Entire Sample
Text preview

The prices have gone really high ,so the poor got frustrated and grain prices were a lot higher which the people needed for a living. Soon, in 1815, Parlaiment passed a corn law to maintain high prices for demestice produced grain through import from foreign grain. The aristocrats had a lot of avantage during Metternich;s time ,but in England, trade parameter was discussed with nobles, middle class and aristocrats. The traders wanted to depend on foreign crops just to have supply of money.

The foreign crops were though in high price which made it harder for the poor to pay. The corn law made both the poor and the wealth pay sale tax on consumer goods. The revoke of the Corn Law helped the poor gain better and low-priced foods, made the

...

aristocracy and the anti-corn law middle class business fall down. The poor didn’t want the corn law because they would eb in debt of the high prices. In the Punch, Robert Peel acts arrogant and turns his back on the poor like he doesn’t care for them (Doc 1).

This Punch is one of the magazines which publicizes satire’s and shows the aristocrats actions that was published it to the people to understand what is going on. During the protests, working men riots at Ely had 7 hanged in 1816… “Swing riots” in the southern countries, 1976 prisoners, 19 hanged 1830-1831 (Doc 3). This is showing the brutally after the corn law done by the government and shows the anger of the poor class on the before the Corn Laws repeal. The poem by Ebenezer Elliot about Corn law,

View entire sample
Join StudyHippo to see entire essay

said, why we have to pay tax when we already provide food for others and we barely have any (Doc 9).

This is saying the poor wanted the corn Law so that they could get better cheap food and more food ,so they don’t starve to death. John Bright, an Anti-Corn Law League member, in his History of the Anti-Corn League on the year of the Repeal, talked about how Robert Peel thought people were cheering for him instead they hated the corn law and wanted him out (Doc 4). Robert Peel thought he did a good job by helping the poor by making the rich and poor both pay taxes which was wrong when he heard the protests by angry poor which they hated him for.

John Bright could have been there at the time and experienced the situation, but maybe only for public view. The situation was stopped by establishing the corn law, which improved the poor and gave middle class more freedom in business. The repeal of the corn law made the middle class frustrated and wanted to establish the Anti-Corn Law League that were mostly liberals and lower class ,but not all Middle class people were like them. Richard Gowing, who said that the League was arousing the country with subscription of quarter of a million sterling (Doc 7).

These actions done by the League shows not only middle class supported it because of the amount of subscriptions and money that was spent of them to gain popularity for Anti-Corn law because the middle class saw their business fall down. Richard Gowing, also said that the middle class also reinforced

the movement by giving them money like spending 100,000 pounds to the supporters, renting 300 pounds for meetings and printing lots of pamphlets to popularize the movement (Doc 6).

Karl Marx, who liked the working class, hated the middle for establishing the Anti-Corn law for destroying the poor and working class for necessary needs like food (Doc 12). Karl Marx really wanted the poor to have a proper way of system to help the poor for the needs they deserve by reducing the prices by using Corn Law so the poor would benefit and get loads of food. The middle class had loads of support , especially economically but still the urban poor didn’t give them a chance to gain full popularity in the country,   The members of the aristocracy disliked the Corn law and thought the Corn law would hurt their business.

Richard Growing’s, quoted what Sir James, an aristocrat did “Sir James, had no patient with the delegates, was a leveler, and said the Corn Law would be a destruct in England and failure in cultivation and would decrease the state and church (Doc 11). Sir James would want to have his own position and wanted the Corn Law to level with him , if not , then the aristocrats would loose their business because before the Corn Law they had surplus of money from the poor. In Robert’s Peels speech, the new corn law has not veried that it would be inconssistant in prosperity in the interst of country (Doc 13).

Robert peel tried to recognize the advantages of the corn law because of what he saw the

nobles and aristrocrats, and poor having problems with high food prices before. In Robert Peels speech,iIn 1843, Robert Peel wanted to abolish Corn law to create that would ham the colonial empire (Doc 15). Robert Peel wanted to abolism the Corn Law which would decoliniz e the empire and not protect people’s interest , but if abolished then people would be in debt and revolution would occur. The aristrocats just wanted to protect their interests , property, rights and privelgaes they earned ebfore the new Corn Law was established.

Get an explanation on any task
Get unstuck with the help of our AI assistant in seconds
New