Evaluating an interpretation of literature Essay Example

doom. In Marlowe’s evaluation of the play, she misguidedly represents him as an untrustworthy and foolish figure. Marlowe mentions “As a character, he is essentially weak and foolish. He is unable to provide the wisdom and support the young protagonists need. ” Marlowe adds a bit of evil into her character description of Friar Laurence, positioning the reader to believe her argument about the causes of Romeo & Juliet’s death.

Christine Marlowe makes good use of language and literary devices to persuade the audience into believing a false portrayal of Friar Laurence and his actions. She decides to use words and phrases like ‘malicious’, ‘dangerous’, ‘reckless’, ‘not dependable’, ‘unreliable, and ‘weak’ to falsely describe him and his actions. Marlowe cleverly included these words to create a stronger impact on the audience to influence their final thoughts about Friar Laurence after reading her version and Shakespeare’s original portrayal.

By doing this she is stripping him of his title and therefore all of his wisdom and power. She mentions in her text “Shakespeare’s subtle use of language and literary devices provides an early indication of a fatal flaw in Friar Laurence, which guides Romeo and Juliet toward tragedy. ” Marlowe shows a successful use of literary devices, for example, Foreshadowing, paradox, soliloquy, and so on, unfortunately lacking truth and accuracy, to persuade readers that Friar Laurence played the key role in Romeo & Juliet’s end.

Marlowe claims “Interestingly Shakespeare provides early warning about the internal flaws of Laurence in his use of language earlier in the play. ” There is another side to this story, Shakespeare’s original version, which is the more accurate version

in my eyes. Christine Marlowe may have fooled some people with her interpretation about the Friar, but not in this case.

She demonstrated an interpretation in the plot, being that she misguidedly portrayed the Friar and his actions, she perceives Friar Laurence’s character to be an ignorant old man who sealed Romeo & Juliet’s doom and she uses language and literary devices to persuade the audience into believing a false portrayal of Friar Laurence. In the end, it should be proven that Christine Marlowe perceives Friar Laurence’s character to be malicious, dangerous, reckless, not dependable, and weak to falsely describe him to the audience.