Charles Singleton Essay Example
Charles Singleton Essay Example

Charles Singleton Essay Example

Available Only on StudyHippo
View Entire Sample
Text preview

Convicted murderer, Charles Laverne Singleton was sentenced to death for the murder of shopkeeper Mary Lou York in Hamburg. Singleton inflicted two fatal stab wounds on York's neck leading to her demise due to excessive blood loss. Post-conviction documentation revealed that Singleton had been diagnosed with schizophrenia. While his mental health remained stable when he took his prescribed medication, failure to do so led him into paranoia episodes. This raises a critical question regarding the state's responsibility to enforce mentally ill prisoners' compliance with antipsychotic drugs thereby making them mentally fit for execution. As per Washington vs. Harper law, prison authorities are authorized to forcibly administer medication if said inmates pose a threat either to themselves or others – as illustrated by Charles Singleton's case. With regular use of his medication, he

...

was completely aware and accountable for his actions; however without it, he became delusional and perceived threats which led him either harm himself or others around him. His refusal towards taking medication made him dangerous eventually resulting in forceful administration of antipsychotic drugs. Despite having set an execution date five times before, during his last appeal at the U.S Supreme Court ruled that he had voluntarily taken his medication.

The drug only alleviates symptoms without curing the patient, stirring a debate between Judges Heany and Wollam as reported in Liptak's 2003 article. Singleton, who was at the heart of this discussion, asked his lawyer not to block his execution. The Court required five trials over a period of 24 years, which was longer than usual for other prisoners in that state, before Singleton was executed by lethal injection. His deat

View entire sample
Join StudyHippo to see entire essay

sentence attracted global attention because Singleton had schizophrenia which rendered him legally insane when unmedicated but considered legally sane when on medication.

The defense attorney contended that the government's strategy to medicate Singleton's mental condition to render him sane enough for execution was inappropriate. Although the drugs might momentarily alleviate his symptoms, they don't treat his ailment. This raises a crucial question: Is he genuinely sane because of medication? Furthermore, would his symptoms reappear if he stopped taking the medicines? Some people may dispute using antipsychotic drugs solely on mentally ill inmates to prepare them for execution. However, we must also contemplate other offenses that lead to capital punishment - in both scenarios, the end result is equally harsh. Personally, I concur with Singleton's lawyer; sanity achieved through medication seems contrived and unnatural. I oppose medicating individuals merely for executing them but believe criminals should receive fitting punishments which doesn't always have to be capital punishment in this instance. Singleton was completely cognizant and conscious when he entered York grocery store and savagely murdered a woman. He swiftly ended her life yet lived another 24 years himself, visiting guests and keeping family ties intact. The evidence against him was compelling with numerous witnesses and victims who recognized him as the offender. There needs to be some kind of penalty for those who murder others.

Get an explanation on any task
Get unstuck with the help of our AI assistant in seconds
New