Alienation in Rohinton Mistry’s Tale From Firozsha Baag Essay Example

on the lives of young Parsi protagonists abroad.

Since these stories deal with the writing of the immigrant experience they suggest a parallel to Rohinton Mistry, the immigrant writer who develops his themes from his past experiences in India and his immigrant experiences in Canada. Nostalgia and a mood of reminiscence mark the pages as Mistry recalls and relives his childhood and adolescent years in the Parsi ‘Baag’. The protagonists in “Squatter”, “Lend Me Your Light”, and “Swimming Lessons” are typical migrants drawn to the west for its prosperity and success. If the comic tone pervades “Squatter”, the other two tales explore the psychological consequences of diaspora.

For Jamshed, the protagonist in “Lend Me Your Light”, and for Kersi, the young protagonist in “Swimming Lessons”, the voyage to the West is an imperative need, a quest for prosperity. Their realization, that they are misfits in India drives them to the ‘Chosen Land’ (America or Canada). These stories set wholly or partially in Canada and display to the maximum extent the vision of the diasporic aspect. In these stories, Mistry transfers the experience from India to Canada and the diasporic trauma of belonging to a minority group (Parsi) in India as well as in Canada.

The inhabitants of Firozsha Baag are mostly Paris and they constitute a tiny minority in the multi-cultural country, India. Sarosh, an Indian from the Parsi community living in Firozsha Baag, is an emigrant to Canada. As a result of this diasporic movement, the cultural spaces of two apparently diverse nations – India and Canada are brought together through the emigration. Portrayal of Parsis’ search for identity, the feelings

of alienation, isolation and unhappiness in the foreign land find an echo in the story “Squatter”.

In ‘Squatter’, the journey motif predominates. It represents (Sarosh) Sid’s transition from a state of innocence to a state of experience. Ten years later, he calls himself ‘Sid’ and is totally westernized in all ways except one. Sarosh in “Squatter” is unable to solve the problem of using the Canadian washroom correctly. This story illustrates that name change signifies Sarosh’s desire to become a Canadian and thus to erase the trace of his own identity in India. Throughout the story, Mistry discusses this experience of Sarosh in light-hearted manner.

Sarosh wants to change his toilet habits but his inability to use western toilet symbolizes his cultural dislocation and its social and psychological danger. In fact, it is not merely the western toilet but the xenophobia that makes his adjustment even more difficult in a foreigncountry. It is intensive and passionate search for self in a world divided into the “Chosen Land” and the native land. Mistry captures the dilemma of the expatriate whether to stay on in Canada or to return back to his country. Sarosh wishes to defecate in a western style.

He is ready to solve his defecating problem through a CNI (Crappus Non-Interruptus) operation. Through the doctor, he understands that the CNI operation can only help him to modify his squatting habit and it does not make any difference to his identity. Sarosh’s attempts to give up his own identity result in alienation and displacement. Even if he uses a new name for him (Sid), his failure to defecate like a westerner prevents

him from obtaining a successful identity as a Canadian. Sarosh’s story is the story of a man who lost his identity in a new land.

This story shows the love-hate association that exists between the land and the immigrants. He realizes how different he has grown, how incompatible he finds life in his native land. At the same time, he feels estranged and exiled in the adopted land. Sid’s quest for home in the native land is an exercise in futility. Thus, he remains an exile both at home and abroad. Sarosh represents those Indian immigrants, who desire to become completely Canadian, seems quite willing to forget their ethnic past, to efface their native roots and immerse themselves totally in western culture.

The aim of Sarosh is assimilation and his inability to achieve that is seen as a sign of failure. He seems to be passing through a transitional phase of adjustment, which is a period of inner conflict and turmoil and through which every diaspora passes. The story “Lend Me Your Light” considers in depth the question of the ethnic identity of immigrants and focuses on the problems encountered by the Indian diaspora and sense of displacement by contrasting the lives of the two friends – Jamshed and Kersi.

Jamshed who possesses very high ambitions, dreams of a bright future and material success, abhors India and decides to migrate to America. He declares that one day he is going abroad to escape from the clutches of corruption in this country. For him Bombay is horrible, dirtier than ever. Percy Boyce leaves Bombay to work for the uplift of farmers in rural

India. Percy’s brother Kersi, the narrator and the protagonist of the story, who migrates to Canada, seems to bind the two extreme positions. Kersi is alienated from all things Indian and his fascination is with all things foreign.

To him, expatriation is painful, going through complex process involving severing ties with his homeland. Though the “Chosen Land”, promises prosperity and success, his inner self remains chaotic. Kersi and Jamshed represent the typical immigrant psyche. They are caught between the two worlds – the one they have forsaken and the other which had failed them despite initial promises. Their inability to find happiness in the chosen land and the inability to discard the old world leads to tension. Jamshed is symbolic of one side of the Indian diaspora, who do not feel alienated in an alien land.

He gets completely merged in American culture and adopts its values. He thinks that the people in US and Canada do not possess the ‘ghati’ (persons who live in Western Ghats) mentality, like people in India. He believes that being an American or a Canadian is better than being an Indian. Thus, Jamshed views his native land with resentment. He seems to have forgotten his ethnic past and indigenous culture and is an example of total assimilation in the West. He fully identifies himself with the American melting pot and decries everything of the past.

Kersi, the protagonist, is viewed as a lost and lonely person in the midst of his new environment even among or especially among other Parsis in Toronto. Their airs and opinions sicken him; they speak condescendingly of India and Indians; they

adopt the manner of rich tourists when they pay occasional visit to India. Kersi looks at his native land with enough detachment. His quest in Canada is for an identity that helps him to define himself in “Chosen Land”. Kersi feels to be in the middle of the process of adaptation. He is in conflict in choosing his identity.

The consequence is that Kersi feels that he has two identities: Indian and Western. For Kersi, Jamshed embodies this detestable attitude where, like the rest, he is almost determined to see the worst of India. Kersi’s reaction towards Jamshed is antithetical. Kersi tries hard to love India from which they have all escaped; to be determined to be homesick, therebyconvincing hemselves of a sense of loyalty and patriotism that they cannot wholly feel. By romanticising the old folks at home, they felt less faceless and lost in the New World.

Kersi wonders why Jamshed’s heart is full of disdain and discontentment even when he was living under different conditions now. He does not approve of Jamshed’s condemnation of India and tries to retain his ethnic identity. Kersi is ambivalent in his response. He is not as forthright as Jamshed in his rejection of Bombay. Nor does he accept Bombay like Percy. Kersi is also acutely aware of the dirt, filth, hostility, tension and corruption in his “returned” vision of Bombay. Before leaving for Toronto, Kersi suffers from an eye disease called conjunctivitis at the time of his departure to Canada.

His last glance of India is through his sunglasses. He compares himself to T. S. Eliot’s blind seer Tiresias. He says that he

is blind and throbbing between two lives, the one in Bombay and the one to come in Toronto. This shows that Kersi does still have hope that he would be able to select the identity of the better of the countries, India or Canada. In Canada, Kersi tries to unite himself with his cultural bond and ethnic identity. Kersi, towards the end of the story, becomes more pessimistic. He is alienated from all things Indian and his fascination is with all things foreign. This attitude of Kersi results in a deep seated guilt to him.

The feelings of guilt connected with this voluntary migration are important in this story. He realizes that he is guilty of the sin of hubris for seeking emigration out of the land of his birth. This reflects the failure to adapt to the new identity and to cope with the conflict of values in the Canadian diaspora. Kersi hangs between hope and disillusionment. But Kersi is no second Tiresias because his blindness does not result in a new kind of vision that would enable him to predict the future. The result of his leading two lives is not a double vision but schizophrenia, that is, failure to adapt to reality.

So he becomes a failure not only in adapting himself to the new land but also he is blind towards his identity as an Indian. For Kersi, expatriation is a painful, though complex, process involving severing ties with his homeland. The “Chosen Land” promises prosperity and success, but his inner self remains chaotic. Kersi and Jamshed represent the typical self-centred immigrant psyche. The desire to be located within

an indigenous culture and work there and the gravitation pull towards the western metropolis and get assimilated in that culture provide a major creative tension in this story.

They are caught between the two worlds – the one they have forsaken and the “other” into which they could not get integrated. Their inability to find happiness in the chosen land and their inability to discard the old world lead them to tension which, in fact, characterizes all expatriate writing. Despite his initial failure, the protagonist ultimately settles in the expatriate setting of Canada. He accomplishes what is still a cherished ideal for an expatriate – “rebirth” in the chosen land which would ensure him an identity.

The reality is that an immigrant everywhere remains a foreigner and feels sadness in his eyes. When he looks back at the world he has left behind and despairs when he looks forward in alien and inhospitable land. Sarosh (“Squatter”), Jamshed and Kersi (“Lend Me Your Light”) are characters who have direct experience of immigration. Their attempts to balance the parent and the adopted cultures result in varying degree of success. Sarosh totally fails to adapt whereas Jamshed totally immerses himself in the adopted cultures.