Effects of Social Networking to Students

essay B
  • Words: 5534
  • Category:

  • Pages: 21

Get Full Essay

Get access to this section to get all the help you need with your essay and educational goals.

Get Access

1 CHAPTER 1 THE PROBLEM AND ITS BACKGROUND INTRODUCTION Social Networking is one of the trendiest topics being talked about by the students in Sta. Teresa College. Examples of social networking sites are Friendster, Facebook, Twitter and MySpace. Social Networking Sites help us to communicate with our friends, classmates, and relatives but they also allow us to communicate with other people who contribute to common interests with us. For instance a person added another person as a friend on Facebook since both of them is addicted on playing Restaurant City. Through these ocial networking sites, we develop virtual interpersonal relationships. An interpersonal relationship is a relatively long-term relationship between two or more people. This connection may be based on emotions like love and liking, regular business interactions, or some other type of social commitments. Interpersonal relationships take place in a great variety of contexts, such as family, friends, marriage, acquaintances, work, clubs, neighborhoods, and churches. They may be regulated by law, custom, or mutual agreement, and re the basis of social groups and society as a whole. Social networking sites manipulate the interpersonal relationship of students in many ways. Through social networking sites, users come to meet other people worldwide. These people can affect the user’s interpersonal relationship with other people close to him/her. This influence can either be good or bad for the user. The researchers chose the topic about the influence 2 of social networking sites to be studied because it is shown evidently that most of the students in Sta. Teresa College use Social Networking Sites as art of their activities done in the internet. Many students always log in to their account on Facebook, Twitter, etc. as a part of their everyday routine. Could you imagine the number of all the students logging in to these social networking sites, everyday? That would be millions of students logging in social networking sites. Why students are interested on these sites? Social networking sites typically offer many features and those features are positively the reason why many students are interested in checking out these sites. One of the general features of SNS is rofiles. A profile contains all the information about the person plus their photos, videos, applications that they use and comments/messages posted by other persons. Well, SNS also offers special features like for example, Facebook has social games like Restaurant City and Pet Society. It is evident that many students greatly rely on these sites in order to interact with their friends and other people whether they know them or not. Being dependent to these sites promotes online friendships which are not good since they might encounter people that are suspicious in behavior.

These sites hinder face-to-face friendship but many students reason out that they use SNS in order to communicate conveniently with their faraway friends. What do these SNS possess to make the students keep on using them? Why do students upload photos, videos, post comments/messages on other profiles and play social games? What are the benefits and purpose of doing these activities? Why are social networking sites frequently used by 3 students nowadays? The researchers’ goal is to address these questions and have an in-depth study with regards to those questions stated above.

Students’ usage of social networking sites provides long-lasting insights to identity construction, social behavior and peer-to-peer interaction therefore studies such as this arises that found out the real perspective of students about social life. STATEMENT OF THE PROBLEM This study aimed on determining the Influence of Social Networking Sites to the interpersonal relationship of the students. Particularly, the researchers seek for the answers in the following questions: 1. What is the profile of the students in terms of: 1. 1 Age? 1. 2 Gender? 1. 3 Year Level? 2.

What is the profile of the students in terms of using Social Networking Sites? 2. 1 Frequency of Using 2. 2 Purpose of Using 2. 3 Number of close friends. Online friends 3. What is the influence of SNS to interpersonal relationship of students toward their: 3. 1 Family 3. 2 Friends 3. 3 Teachers 4 SIGNIFICANCE OF THE STUDY The researchers determined the role of social networking sites on the social aspects of students. Students – The result of this study will make the students aware of how does social networking sites influence them and how does it affect their interpersonal relationships.

This will educate the students regarding the proper usage of social networking sites. This will help the students to improve their social life with the use of social networking sites. Teachers – This study can help the teachers by suggesting some ways in order for them to relate with student’s social activities especially with regards of using social networking sites. In line with this, teachers, as student’s second parents, will know a way how to help the students if they will be encountering a problem regarding the relationship of their students with other people.

Parents – This study will help parents to understand their child’s purpose of using social networking sites and for them to be aware of the influence from social networking sites that might affect their children. With enough knowledge, parents can think of possible preventive ways if their child is prone to develop a weak interpersonal relationship with other people because of too much usage and dependence from social networking sites. 5 SCOPE AND LIMITATIONS The researchers conducted a study about the influence of social networking sites on the students of Sta.

Teresa College. This study considered every aspect of students including the age, gender and year level in terms of social networking sites and their social interaction at home, with classmates, teachers and friends. They also studied the interpersonal relationship of students toward their friends, teachers, and parents as well as the influences of social networking sites to their interpersonal relationship. This study focused on the influences of social networking sites to the interpersonal relationship of students. This research involved 239 current high school students of Sta.

Teresa College within the school year 2011 to 2012 who use social networking sites every day. DEFINITIONS OF TERMS This study, which is about the influence of social networking sites to the interpersonal relationship of the students, used the following terms defined conceptually and operationally. These terms are used within the context of the study. Face – to – face friendship – It is a type of friendship wherein you can actually be with them and see them more often and you know about them well enough. Offline Friend – It is a term used to call a person who is your friend in real life.

Online Friend – It is a term used to call a person added on your Social Networking Site account. 6 Privacy – It is the ability of an individual or group to secure their personal information and activities apart from others. Profile – This is offered by social networking sites that contains all the personal information about the person and their activities. Social behavior – It is behavior directed towards society, or taking place between members of the same species. Social Games – They are defined as games found in social networking sites hich allow social interaction with friends during the gameplay. (ex. Pet Society) Social Networking – It refers to making a social structure made of nodes that are tied by one or more specific types of interdependency, such as friendship, kinship, financial exchange, dislike, sexual relationships, or relationships of beliefs, knowledge or prestige. Social Networking Sites – It focuses on building online communities of people who share interests and/or activities, or who are interested in exploring the interests and activities of others. Social networking sites are web based nd provide a variety of ways for users to interact. 7 CHAPTER II REVIEW OF RELATED LITERATURE AND STUDIES This chapter contains the review of related literature of the study and the justification of the conceptual and research literature gathered from books, journals, researches and online sources. CONCEPTUAL LITERATURE Social networking sites have added entirely new meanings to interpersonal interaction and community. It is the interplay between internet and real life communication and its subsequent effect on interpersonal relationships.

Popular social networking websites such as Facebook have bundled many of the internet communication standards such as e-mail, forums, and instant messaging into one resource. However, its usage has become a staple activity in a young adult’s life. While it varies slightly among gender and race groups, overall, young adults (highschool students) who have internet access use Facebook regularly for some type of social contact. With this mass assimilation into daily life, it has already begun to change the way in which interpersonal relationships are defined.

It is one of the, if not the top medium for young adults to “scope out” and “research” potential partners. With Facebook playing a large role in many romantic relationships, it’s important to see how this will continue to shape interpersonal communication in the future. The importance of this research proposal is to look at how Facebook is an extension of real life. This aims to discover how far Facebook is used to define, cultivate, and maintain real life interpersonal romantic relationships. Through looking at 8 previous research on Facebook, online romantic relationships, and disclosure hrough internet communication, we will see what direction research needs to go to find valid conclusions on the interplay of real life and Facebook in the development of interpersonal romantic relationships. Internet based communication has been incorporated into the development of interpersonal relationships. Likewise, as popular social networking sites MySpace and Facebook have cropped up over the years, affecting the way in which people communication, so has limited research on the social mediums. It was found that 28% of the students in the study had been deceptive in their internet communication.

The students were found to do this through both direct communication using the wall post and private message features as well as indirectly by the viewing of others profiles. While Facebook is used to cultivate old and new relationships, it is also used by students in romantic relationships to display and check the status and commitment of their relationship. When people write and develop their profile, choose their profile picture, and publicly write on other user’s Facebook “walls,” Research has shown that when college aged males posted information about culturally negative moral ehaviors (partying, sexism, etc. ) that they were participating in on other users “walls. ” their perceived attractiveness went up. However, when females did it, their attractiveness went down. In the area of romantic relationships, no Facebook research has looked at how much real life interaction is required before a potential romantic partner is not seen as a “stalker” or in any kind of negative light. Since internet usage is directly related to psychological well-being, relationships, and the identity of 9 self, it is of interest to note that there is a positive relationship between easures of internet usage and loneliness. No research has looked into how lonely or desperate a Facebook user is when trying to find a potential romantic partner. Matsuba’s research has shown that real life relationships are looked at as more “real” in the negative and positive dimensions of personal qualities, while internet only relationships were less extreme. If real life relationships are seen as more “real” and Facebook is an online medium of communication for those real life relationships, then research needs to look at how far Facebook defines the romantic relationships.

Research has found that those who use the internet to create and maintain a secondary romantic relationship in addiction to a real life one showed higher levels of relational certainty and high expectations of future interaction with their online partners. It’s also been found that time spent online and positive views of the internet lead to a more favorable view of online romantic relationships. Therefore, there’s a possibility that personal romantic beliefs are used more for a conventional relationship than an online-only relationship. While these studies have little relevance to the ultivation of a real life romantic relationship through Facebook, it is important to see the connections and disconnects between real life and internet life. This needs to be developed further to see how much Facebook is used in the initial stages of romantic relational development compared to usage when the partners have a highly developed real life relationship. Some study found individuals who reported high levels of social and/or dating anxiety were not more likely to use the internet to make online relationships than those who reported lower levels of social or dating anxiety.

However, the research did 10 show that certain online media (particularly webcams) are more likely to be used by people with social and dating anxiety symptoms, than those with less. This could play into new research about whether certain features of Facebook are used more so in romantic relational development by social and dating anxious than other features. According to Web Credible social networks provide encouragement and support; establish identity with others and fulfill the need to feel included; provide the outlet for some people to establish their need for recognition, ocial status, control or leadership; provide the necessary control over aspects of lives for those who don’t want to be leaders; help establish friends, relationships and the opportunity to interact with others. Conversely, introverted adolescents used online communication to compensate for their lacking of certain social skills. However, along with these characteristics came a stronger motivation to talk online, resulting in more online based friendships. It is interesting to note that the introverts use the internet to compensate for their lack of social skills

The studies show how important a user’s perception of internet communication affects their levels of self disclosure. Interpersonal trust is found online through how many the users perceive the other person to be telling the truth. However, with Facebook interaction, things could be different. Research needs to look into how knowing someone directly could directly affect the way in which disclosure, empathy, and trust is built through Facebook. We also see an entirely new set of internet based non-verbal forming.

While there have been numerous studies on internet based communication concerning romantic relationships, self disclosure, and social 11 networking, this research proposal takes it a step further to look at the social utility of Facebook and the subsequent interplay of real life and on-line life in defining interpersonal romantic relationships. RESEARCH LITERATURE According to Vitak (2008), there are some reasons why an individual uses asocial networking site. The first reason is for them to meet strangers and become friends with them. This type of relationship is what we call a weak interpersonal relationship.

The majority of respondents of her research paper (57%) said they were initially introduced to those “friends” through mutual friends, which increases the likelihood of such relationships developing into strong ties. On the other hand, responses to a separate question overwhelmingly support the hypothesis. While a significant portion or respondents said they have at least a few online-online friends, 85% said they do not communicate with the majority of their online-only friends, and just one respondent said that he/she considered those friends as a strong tie.

Through social networking sites like facebook, the user tends to maintain his weak interpersonal relationship with his online friends because of an easy communication. He can use private messaging, chat rooms, and other method of communicating provided by the website. On the other hand, a strong interpersonal relationship with his offline friends needs time and effort to be maintained. Distance between two users that can change an offline relationship into online relationship is also a reason why an individual uses SNSs. Nearly wo-thirds (65%) of respondents said the majority of their friends have a 12 Facebook account, which suggests that many students use the site to stay in touch with their offline friends. Keeping in touch with friends remains the primary reason for site usage across both years in school and gender. Furthermore, approximately one-third (31%) of respondents with friends who do not have a Facebook account say they would be closer to those friends if they were on the site, and 87% of respondents said they had never xperienced negative consequences in their offline relationships due to content in their Facebook profiles, which suggests that most respondents benefit from using the site. With the use of private messaging and chat rooms of this site, students can communicate and maintain a healthy relationship with their friends from far places with ease that takes only a few seconds to complete it. Social Networking Sites also have negative effects in offline relationships. Something found in the site can lead to misinterpretation for some people.

Because of online messaging or comments that are visible to everyone in the friends list of a user, an offline relationship can be affected or destroyed due to fights that will happen. For example, a jealous boyfriend saw a comment from a mysterious boy posted on the wall of his girlfriend that says intimate words, because of this, the relationship between the girl and his boyfriend can be broken. Another negative effect is, because of posting comments on the wall of a user became much easier, it will also be effortless for other people to spread rumors and gossips that can destroy a life of an ndividual. As a larger percentage of communication moves into the digital arena, we will see a general weakening of ties between people. This weakening will 13 be less pervasive among a person’s closest circle of friends and more obvious among lesser friends, as digital communication will become the primary mode of communication in these relationships. This related studies and concepts helped in determining the influence of social networking sites on the interpersonal relationship of students in Sta. Teresa College of the school year 2011-2012. This supported and validated or eversed the ideas of Matsuba and Golder (2006), and Vitak (2008). There were some studies conducted that dealt with social networking and its effects towards teenagers in different aspects. Interpersonal relationship, particularly that of high school students in Sta. Teresa College, isn’t one of those aspects, although some of the aforementioned studies have tackled somewhat similar aspects to that of the one being studied on by the researchers. 14 CHAPTER 3 METHODOLOGY This chapter contains Research Design, Sampling Technique, Research Instrument, Data Gathering Procedure and Statistical Treatment of Data. RESEARCH DESIGN

This study used descriptive research design. It involves the description, recording, analysis, and interpretation of the present nature, composition, or processes of phenomena. It focuses on prevailing conditions or how a person, group, or thing behaves or functions in the present. It often involves some type of comparison or contrast. The researchers used the survey technique which is under descriptive research design. Survey technique, requires gathering of facts that requires sufficient and accurate interpretation. This technique is used to collect demographic data about respondent’s behavior, eliefs, opinions, interests and the like and then the gathered data are analyzed, organized, and interpreted. SAMPLING TECHNIQUE The researchers used purposive sampling. This sampling method included respondents that fall under the purpose of the study and others that are not useful for the study are positively excluded. The study focused on the effects of SNS to the interpersonal relationship thus a survey is conducted to 15 the high school students of Sta. Teresa College that are using social networking sites every day. RESEARCH INSTRUMENT

The researchers used questionnaires and survey forms as research instruments. The survey form asked if the respondents are using social networking sites and their frequency of using the sites. After determining those who use social networking sites everyday, the questionnaire asked for the profile of the respondents and the status of their interpersonal relationship with their family, friends, teachers, classmates and others. DATA GATHERING PROCEDURE The researchers will distribute a survey form to each section in order to determine the users of social networking sites and must be accomplished ithin two to three days. After the researchers collected the survey forms, a list of the respondents which are SNS users will be organized then copies of the main questionnaire will be produced. The copies of the main questionnaire will depend on the number of the respondents. However, extra copies will be reproduced if some respondents loss their questionnaires. The respondents will be given two to three days allowance to answer the main questionnaire. An officer of each section will be selected to distribute and collect the questionnaires. Once the deadline of the questionnaires arrived, the esearchers will coordinate with the officers to retrieve all the questionnaires completely. The questionnaires gathered will contain all the needed data for the study and it will be organized, summarized, analyzed, and interpreted. 16 CHAPTER 4 PRESENTATION, ANALYSIS AND INTERPRETATION OF DATA In this chapter, the data gathered by the researchers has been tabulated, analyzed and interpreted to get a meaningful conclusion about the data. PROBLEM 1: What is the profile of the students in terms of year level, age, gender? Using frequency and percentage, the results in Table 1. 1 showed that out of 239 respondents, 75 or 31. 8 percent are sophomores, 61 or 25. 52 percent are freshmen, 60 or 25. 10 percent are seniors, and 43 or 17. 99 percent are juniors. Using frequency and percentage, the results in Table 1. 2 showed that out of 239 respondents, 70 or 21. 29 percent are 13 years old, 54 or 22. 59 17 percent are 14 years old, 49 or 20. 50 percent are 15 years old, and 41 or 17. 15 percent are 16 years old, and25 or 10. 46 percent are 12 years old. Using frequency and percentage, the results in Table 1. 3 showed that out of 239respondents, 127 or 53. 14 percent are females while 112 or 46. 86 percent are males.

PROBLEM 2: What is the profile of the students in terms of preferred SNS, frequency of SNS usage, purpose of using SNS and number of SNS friends? Using frequency and percentage, the results in Table 1. 4 showed that out of 239respondents, 200 or 92. 05 percent preferred Facebook, 10 or 4. 18 18 percent preferred Friendster, 5 or 2. 09 percent preferred other SNS, 3 or 1. 26 percent preferred Twitter, and 1 or 0. 42 percent preferred Multiply. Using frequency and percentage, the results in Table 1. 5 showed that out of 239respondents, 80 or 33. 47 percent use SNS for 1-2 hours, 76 or 31. 80 percent use SNS for 3-4 hours, 35 or 14. 4 percent use SNS for more than 6 hours, 27 or 11. 30 percent use SNS for 5-6 hours, and 21 or 8. 79 percent use SNS for less than an hour. Using frequency and percentage, the results in Table 1. 6 showed that out of 239 respondents, 117 or 48. 95 percent agreed that their purpose of 19 using SNS is “Just for fun and entertainment; 76 or 31. 80 percent agreed on “Keeping in touch with friends”; 25 or 10. 46 percent agreed on “Keeping in touch with family”; 2 or 0. 84 percent agreed on “To be ‘in’ because it’s popular nowadays”; and 1 or 0. 42 percent agreed on other purpose. Using frequency and percentage, the results in Table 1. showed that out of 239 respondents, 45 or 18. 83 percent has 100+ friends, 39 or 16. 32 percent has 200+friends, 38 or 15. 90 percent has 300+ friends, 28 or 11. 72 percent has 400+ friends, 21or 8. 79 percent has 500+ friends, 18 or 7. 53 percent has less than 100 friends, 15 or 6. 28 percent has 600+ friends, 14 or 5. 86 percent has 1000+ friends, 8 or 3. 35 percent has 800+ friends, 7 or 2. 93 percent has 700+ friends, and 6 or 2. 51 percent has 900+friends. 20 PROBLEM 3: What is the interpersonal relationship of students toward their Family, Friends, Teachers, and Others? Legend: 3. 1 – 4. 00 = Always 2. 51 – 3. 50 = Often 1. 51 – 2. 50 = Sometimes 0. 51 – 1. 50 = Seldom 0. 00 – 0. 50 = Never 21 Table 3. 1 shows the respondents’ interpersonal relationship with their family. The mean score of Table 3. 1 is 2. 9 or often. As a result of using social networking sites, the respondents prioritize on having quality time with their family (3); want to keep in touch with their family (3); have better communication with their family (3); express themselves more with their family (3); balance their time with their family (3); obey the rules of their parents (3); re ready to help when their family needs them (3); enjoy having time with their family (3); want to interact more with their family (2. 75) 22 Legend: 3. 51 – 4. 00 = Always 2. 51 – 3. 50 = Often 1. 51 – 2. 50 = Sometimes 0. 51 – 1. 50 = Seldom 0. 00 – 0. 50 = Never Table 3. 2 shows the respondents interpersonal relationship with their friends. The mean score of the Table 3. 2 is 3. 0 or often. As a result of using social networking sites, the respondents enjoy spending time with their friends 23 (3. 25); interact more with their friends because of SNS (3); relate to their riends since they also use SNS (3); have good terms with their friends (3); always want to keep in touch with their friends(3); have better communication with their friends because of SNS (3); prefer to spend more time hanging-out with their friends (3); are open with their friends (3); are ready to help when their friends need them (3). Legend: 3. 51 – 4. 00 = Always 2. 51 – 3. 50 = Often 1. 51 – 2. 50 = Sometimes 0. 51 – 1. 50 = Seldom 0. 00 – 0. 50 = Never Table 3. 3 shows the respondents’ interpersonal relationship with their teachers. The mean score of Table 3. 3 is 2. 4 or sometimes. As a result of sing social networking sites, the respondents keep their focus on the lesson being discussed by their teachers(3); prioritize academic-related activities (3); prioritize tasks given by their teachers (3); enjoy interacting with their teachers (3); easily approach their teachers (2. 5); interact more with their teachers 24 because of SNS (2); communicate easily with their teachers with the use of SNS (2); have better communication with their teachers in terms of school works with the help of SNS (2); express themselves more with their teachers because of SNS (2); open with their teachers (2). Legend: 3. 1 – 4. 00 = Always 2. 51 – 3. 50 = Often 1. 51 – 2. 50 = Sometimes 0. 51 – 1. 50 = Seldom 0. 00 – 0. 50 = Never Table 3. 4 shows the respondents’ interpersonal relationship with other people. The mean score of Table 3. 4 is 2. 4 or sometimes. As a result of using social networking sites, the respondents make their contact number and address visible only to their friends (3); share limited information about themselves (3); make their profile visible only to their friends (3);cautious to the people they meet in SNS (2. 75); ignore friends requests from the people they don’t know (2. 5); block people that are suspicious (2); delete comments 25 or posts from other people that they don’t know but added in their friend’s list(2); visit profiles of people added in their list but they don’t know (2); comments to people they don’t but added in their list (2); send friends requests to people they don’t know (1. 75). According to Vitak (2008), there are some reasons why an individual uses asocial networking site. The first reason is for them to meet strangers and become friends with them 26 CHAPTER 5 SUMMARY OF FINDINGS, CONCLUSIONS AND RECOMMENDATIONS

SUMMARY OF FINDINGS The research was conducted for the purpose of finding out the influence of social networking sites to the interpersonal relationship of students in Sta. Teresa College. The descriptive method of research was used and the descriptive survey technique was used by the researchers in gathering data. The researchers made use of questionnaires for the gathering of data. The sampling technique used was purposive sampling technique. The researchers used 239 respondents for this research. This research was onducted during the school year 2011-2012. PROBLEM 1: What is the profile of the students in terms of (a) year level, (b) age, (c) gender? Out of 239 respondents, 75 or 31. 38 percent are sophomores, 61 or 25. 52percent are freshmen, 60 or 25. 10 percent are seniors, and 43 or 17. 99 percent are juniors. Out of 239 respondents, 70 or 21. 29 percent are 13 years old, 54 or 22. 59percent are 14 years old, 49 or 20. 50 percent are 15 years old, and 41 or 17. 15 percent are 16 years old, and 25 or 10. 46 percent are 12 27 years old. Out of 239 respondents, 127 or 53. 14 percent are females while 112 or 46. 6 percent are males. PROBLEM 2: What is the profile of the students in terms of preferred SNS, frequency of SNS usage, purpose of using SNS and number of SNS friends? Out of 239 respondents, 200 or 92. 05 percent preferred Facebook, 10 or 4. 18percent preferred Friendster, 5 or 2. 09 percent preferred other SNS, 3 or 1. 26 percent preferred Twitter, and 1 or 0. 42 percent preferred Multiply. Out of 239 respondents, 80or 33. 47 percent use SNS for 1-2 hours, 76 or 31. 80 percent use SNS for 3-4 hours, 35or 14. 64 percent use SNS for more than 6 hours, 27 or 11. 30 percent use SNS for 5-6 hours, and 21 or 8. 9 percent use SNS for less than an hour. Out of 239 respondents, 117 or 48. 95 percent agreed that their purpose of using SNS is “Just for fun and entertainment; 76 or 31. 80 percent agreed on “Keeping in touch with friends”; 25 or 10. 46 percent agreed on “Keeping in touch with family”; 2 or 0. 84 percent agreed on “Tobe ‘in’ because it’s popular nowadays”; and 1 or 0. 42 percent agreed on other purpose. Out of 239 respondents, 45 or 18. 83 percent has 100+ friends, 39 or 16. 32 percent has200+ friends, 38 or 15. 90 percent has 300+ friends, 28 or 11. 72 percent has 400+friends, 21 or 8. 9 percent has 500+ friends, 18 or 7. 53 percent has less than 100friends, 15 or 6. 28 percent has 600+ friends, 14 or 5. 86 percent has 1000+ friends, 8 or 3. 35 percent has 800+ friends, 7 or 2. 93 percent has 700+ friends, and 6 or 2. 51percent has 900+ friends. PROBLEM 3: What is the interpersonal relationship of students toward their Family, Friends, Teachers, and Others? The mean score of Table 3. 1 Respondent’s Interpersonal Relationship with their family is 2. 9 or often. All the statements were gathered under the 28 mean of 2. 50 to 3. 49. As a result of using social networking sites, the espondents want to interact more with your family because of SNS(2. 75), prioritize on having quality time with their family (3);want to keep in touch with their family (3); have better communication with their family(3); express themselves more with their family (3); balance their time with their family (3); obey the rules of their parents (3); are ready to help when their family needs them(3); enjoy having time with their family (3); want to interact more with their family (2. 75);and have better relationship with their family (2. 5). The mean score of the Table 3. Respondent’s Interpersonal Relationship with their friends is 3. 0 or often. All the statements were gathered under the mean of 2. 55 to 3. 55. As a result of using social networking sites, the respondents enjoy spending time with their friends (3. 25); interact more with their friends because of SNS (3); relate to their friends since they also use SNS (3); have good terms with their friends (3); always want to keep in touch with their friends (3); have better communication with their friends because of SNS (3); prefer to spend more time hanging-out with their friends (3); are open with heir friends (3); and are ready to help when their friends need them (3). The mean score of Table 3. 3 Respondent’s Interpersonal Relationship with their teachers is 2. 4 or sometimes. The statements that were gathered under the mean of 2. 55 to 3. 54 are the ff. : the respondents keep their focus on the lesson being discussed by their teachers (3); prioritize academic-related activities (3); prioritize tasks given by their teachers (3); and enjoy interacting with their teachers (3). The statements that were gathered under the mean of 1. 55 to 2. 54 are the ff: the respondents easily approach their teachers (2. ); interact more with their teachers because of SNS (2); communicate easily 29 with their teachers with the use of SNS (2); have better communication with their teachers in terms of school works with the help of SNS (2); express themselves more with their teachers because of SNS (2); and open-up with their teachers (2). The mean score of Table 3. 4 is 2. 4 or sometimes. The statements that were gathered under the mean of 2. 55 to 3. 54 are the ff: the respondents make their contact number and address visible only to their friends (3); share limited information about themselves (3); make their profile visible only to their riends (3); and cautious to the people they meet in SNS (2. 75). The statements that were gathered under the mean of 1. 55 to 2. 54 are the ff: the respondents ignore friends requests from the people they don’t know (2. 25); block people that are suspicious (2); delete comments or posts from other people that they don’t know but added in their friend’s list(2); visit profiles of people added in their list but they don’t know (2); comments to people they don’t but added in their list (2); send friends requests to people they don’t know (1. 75). CONCLUSIONS

After analyzing the data gathered by the researchers, they arrived with the following conclusions: 1. ) Using social networking sites helped the respondents to develop a strong interpersonal relationship with their family, friends, teachers, and with others. 2. ) Most of the respondents are using Facebook just to have fun and entertainment because of its available features for the users. 30 3. ) The respondents are cautious with the strangers that they meet in SNS’s because of having a limited friends added to their account that they know. 4. ) The respondents intend to open-up more with their friends in social etworking sites than with others. 5. ) Most of the respondents use social networking sites for only 1-2 hours in a day. RECOMMENDATION Based on the conclusions that the researches made, they have formulated the following recommendations: 1. ) Parents, school administrators, teachers, and guidance counselors must encourage the students to use SNS since it promotes good interpersonal relationships. 2. ) Students must properly use social networking sites and not just for fun and entertainment but for communication with their family, friends and eachers. 3. ) Social networking site developers and companies must improve the security and privacy that they are giving to its users to promote a safe environment especially for children and teenagers. 4. ) Students must also encourage their classmates to use SNS frequently since it promotes good communication with their teachers regarding school works and related activities. 5. ) Students must also encourage their friends to use SNS since it promotes good relationship making friendship ties grow stronger. 31

BIBLIOGRAPHY 2008. “Social networking the safe way”. Bato balani for science & technology,28, 4-5. Boyd, D. and N. Ellison. Social networking sites: definition, history, and scholarship”. http://jcmc. indiana. edu/vol13/issue1/boyd. ellison. html, September 1, 2009. Boyd, D. and N. Ellison. Social networking sites: definition, history, and scholarship”. http://jcmc. indiana. edu/vol13/issue1/boyd. ellison. html, September 1, 2009. Dwyer, C. “Digital relationship in the ‘myspace’ generation: results from a quantitative study”. http://www. [email protected] edu. com, September 12, 2009. Harris, K. 008. “The internet and social relationships”. http://www. donah. org/ archieve3s. htm, September 12, 2009. Harris, K. 2008. “Using social networking sites as student engagement tools”. http://donah. org/snstudents. htm, September 9, 2009. Lenhart, A. “Social networking websites and teens”. http://www. peinternet. org? pDF? n? 198? report_display. asp, September 12, 2009. Nauert, R. “Social network may foster jealousy”. http://psychcentral. com/news/ 2009/08/07/social-network-may-foster-jealousy/7616. html, September 26, 2009. 32 Santos, M. 2009. “Everyone’s connected”. Crossroads, 5, 4-5.

Get instant access to
all materials

Become a Member
unlock