Children in poverty in Brazil and the UK Essay Example

areas like favelas where access to public healthcare and security is limited.

Women face restricted entry to employment and government services when subjected to high levels of social discrimination. The UK has relative poverty - individuals living below the national income, while Brazil endures absolute poverty where people lack fundamental necessities like food, clothing, and shelter. Astonishingly, one in seven kids born in the UK currently resides in poverty, a remarkably high rate among affluent nations considering the country's wealth.

Social exclusion is a common issue across different domains like leisure, hobbies, travel and social groups. A significant proportion of households in the country cannot afford medical treatment, which creates an uneven society. The UK is facing growing disparity with more affluent and deprived individuals. This inequality leads to an unfair system where economically challenged people face difficulty in education and essential facilities are often ignored, causing negative impacts on the economy due to higher unemployment rates. Both countries also encounter severe challenges from elevated crime levels.

Insufficient education in favelas and poor housing areas in the UK causes a pattern of gang violence and teenage crime. To enhance living conditions and lower crime rates, both nations require superior-quality housing options that offer low-cost, spacious residences for larger families. This strategy will prevent children from loitering on the streets and reduce child poverty.

The UK is witnessing a surge in the cost of living, posing difficulties for low-income families in supporting their loved ones. This trend has led to severe outcomes akin to Brazil, with high levels of social exclusion and inequality manifesting. Consequently, numerous children face the risk of marginalization and limited opportunities. Moreover, almost 9.5 million Britons

cannot access adequate housing due to their financial constraints. Furthermore, less than ten percent of the populace perceives everyday amenities like dishwashers, mobile phones, internet connectivity or satellite television as crucial.

Society's "barriers" such as inadequate housing, poor health, and insufficient skills hinder full participation of individuals. NGOs and governments are offering support to countries struggling with child poverty, including the UK. In one of the world's wealthiest nations, we urge the government to prioritize areas facing severe deprivation and do more to put an end to child poverty. Technology alone cannot alleviate this issue, as reducing reliance on working tax credit and benefits is also necessary. An escalation of this problem could lead to more parents failing to provide for their children.

Child labour is a widespread problem in Brazil, with minors toiling for extended periods while earning meager salaries. This exploitation of young workers does not alleviate child poverty. However, there are top-down initiatives like the government's "Fome Zero" program that aim to eliminate hunger and destitution. Conversely, bottom-up organizations such as 'the Posse' charitable groups rescue street children. Although the government tries to delegate authority to local governments, a lack of resources and cooperation can render this approach impractical.

According to me, Brazil requires economic growth to diminish inequality by improving education and reducing illness which would ultimately lead to the creation of more job opportunities. My suggestion is that the government should primarily focus on aiding underprivileged children in acquiring an education. On the other hand, the British administration must prioritize sustaining and enhancing stability.