There are various situations in daily life that can trigger feelings of anger and leave no room for tolerance.
According to Portmann (2000, p. 25), in daily life, situations can arise where even close individuals make extremely harsh and personal comments, leaving no solution but to resort to physical and verbal aggression. There are many examples that illustrate this fact, such as a college kid riding his bicycle when a group of boys in a car shout at him without any personal connection.
Disturbing and shocking a bicycle rider by shouting can cause them to lose concentration on the road, leading to anything from nothing to accidents. This situation does not call for tolerance, and the rider may feel compelled to get off their bike and confront the driver. Such mischievous acts are seen daily on the streets and are considered intolerable. Teenagers are often found performing stunts
...on heavily trafficked roads, disrupting traffic flow. These acts are also intolerable and warrant no tolerance.
12). Another scenario that exemplifies the aforementioned case is baseless judgments directed towards individuals. Such judgments, particularly those related to personal morality and character, are intolerable to human ego and self-respect. They can lead to loss of patience and physical assault on the individual who made such comments without proper consideration (Provoost, 1998, p. 67). Verbal arguments can also lead to situations that require zero tolerance, specifically when comments are made indirectly or directly related to another individual's parents.
Portmann (2000, p. 89) notes that making derogatory comments about someone's parents is widely considered unacceptable and can provoke physical violence. Such situations are intolerable and call for physical punishment
to teach the responsible party a lesson. To differentiate between tolerable and intolerable situations, it is crucial to identify those that do not attack an individual's character or morality or unnecessarily endanger their life. For instance, consider the case of a cyclist who was endangered by the mischievous actions of others who were aware of the potential consequences of their behavior.
Alternatively, Baumeister and Bushman (2007, p. 56) have cited instances of direct arguments and remarks that criticize an individual's moral values or parents. In conclusion, certain circumstances may warrant a zero tolerance approach, such as scenarios where those responsible for their actions knowingly put others at risk or make disparaging comments about the dignity, morality, or family of others, and therefore deserve to be physically reprimanded.
- Values of Life essays
- Ethical dilemma essays
- Normative Ethics essays
- Virtue Ethics essays
- Belief essays
- Deontology essays
- Moral essays
- Virtue essays
- Work Ethic essays
- Adolescence essays
- Childhood essays
- Growth Mindset essays
- Individual essays
- Infant essays
- Is Google Making Us Stupid essays
- Acceptance essays
- Age Of Enlightenment essays
- Child Observation essays
- Confucianism essays
- Conscience essays
- Critical Reflection essays
- Destiny essays
- Determinism essays
- Empiricism essays
- Environmentalism essays
- Epistemology essays
- Ethics essays
- Ethos essays
- Existence essays
- Existentialism essays
- Fate essays
- Free Will essays
- Functionalism essays
- Future essays
- Good And Evil essays
- Human Nature essays
- Individualism essays
- Meaning Of Life essays
- Metaphysics essays
- Natural Law essays
- Personal Philosophy essays
- Philosophers essays
- Philosophy Of Life essays
- Political Philosophy essays
- Pragmatism essays
- Reality essays
- Relativism essays
- Teaching Philosophy essays
- Time essays
- Transcendentalism essays
