Strengths and Weaknesses of Group Decision Making Essay Example
Group decision making is the process involving a group of individuals that serves to tackle a problem to achieve a solution. In other words, people with divergent views act collectively to analyze the situation and come up with alternative courses of action. In this context, the best alternative adopted as the best solution. Though people in the group decision making may appear quite diverse or similar, their ability to come up with opinions and analyze them makes the process easy. On the other side, Christian worldview relates to the overall look into the world that pertains how Christians interprets the world and the framework in which they interact with it. The success of group decision making in the Christian worldview can only be realized if; the group has a defined leader and the members of the group have adequately shared leadership roles, Secondly, m
...embers of the group must portray both individual and collective accountability in the process.
In the context of the Christian worldview, good group decision making is driven by particular motives. Reliable and efficient decision-making starts by discerning and acknowledging the will of God. Psalms 33:18 outlines that God delights in revealing success to those who eager to follow his precepts and directions. Likewise, through Apostle James 1:5 it is evident that whoever lacks wisdom, must ask God for it, for God gives it generously to all his people without fault. Members in a Christian worldview dedicate their decisions to God who in turn makes the whole process a success. Christians, as illustrated in Romans 13, believes that group decisions when articulated results to Christian unity and purpose toward achieving their goals (Bielo, 2009).
Tremendous
success in decision-making is achieved through creating new ideas both in the business perspective and relating to other social issues. For instance, church leaders use the team approach in developing multitude ideas for transforming Christian values. In this mechanism, different minds raise central ideas leading to high-quality solutions to matters affecting the church. In most cases, sharing of information helps Christian leaders to make informed decisions. In this context, each member of the group holds in-depth information that when combined makes an overall quality decision.
Under these circumstances, the biblical world-view contains fundamental principles to reclaim human rights and liberties. Their decisions are based on the normalcy that all human rights have certain moral and business obligations that must be respected. Moreover, Christian beliefs acknowledge that human freedom is a gift from God and not necessarily a gift from the ruling powers. Correspondingly, the Bible supports decisions for human freedom through Galatians 5: 11. In this verse, the Galatians talks of how Christ has set Christians free from slavery to stand firm in their drive to make decisions that protect human rights (Barna, 2000).
In the Christian worldview the decision, making process has faced challenges as well strengths. In building Christian worldview, the decision-making process has gained more strengths and value over time, For instance, this process has enhanced the ability to utilize different minds to come up with better social and business ideas.
Likewise, this process has increased group creativity in the course of working with new ideas and transformations in the Christian point of view. Furthermore, sharing of information in the group decision-making process makes informed decisions that stand against the critics of the Christian family.
For instance, robust solutions and recommendations and better judgments results due to the collective decision-making process. Additionally, information sharing in Christian worldview increases understanding and advantage of varied views on business and social issues. Group decisions result to greater acceptability (Gauld, 2005).
Opinions expressed by groups have more acceptability than individual opinions. In the Christian perspective, group decisions are more democratic as compared to different groups that are more autocratic. Moreover, decision-making process enhances the degree of involvement. This makes members of a Christian group feel involved in a given task or problem. This situation has minimized the extent of resistance thus strengthening Christians and other organizations to facilitate the decision-making process. In addition to that, People participation is enhanced, ideas arising from them are in cooperated in the course of making better solutions (Tenelshof, 1999).
Despite the strengths and advantages of group decision making, there are also other weaknesses related to the same process. First, this process is time-consuming. Individuals involved must have organized strategy for planning and coordinate their activities. The process of attaining the final goals and solutions takes more time, and the whole process of decision-making is quite cumbersome. The ability to fix responsibilities in a group in any organization is quite difficult. For instance, it is quite difficult to assign responsibilities, especially in more challenging circumstances. Above all, individual domination is a setback in the process of decision-making.
Few members can dominate discussion in the making decisions process. Effects of dominance in-group decision-making process make the less regarded group to fade away thus defeating the primary purpose of group decision making. A compromise decision is another challenge facing the process of group decision
making. In this context, members propose different decisions thus difficult to arise to the best solution. Moreover, this process is usually expensive in terms of time and money spent.
In conclusion, the decision-making process in the Christian worldview is a significant challenge that needs attention and great expertise. For instance, group decision must allow equal participation to accommodate and involve various decisions from its members. In other words, group decision-making process provides a platform for people in Christian worldview to present their ideas in the right way.
References
- Barna, G. (2000). Growing true disciples. Issachar Resources.
- Bielo, J. S. (2009). Words upon the word: An ethnography of evangelical group Bible study. NYU Press.
- Gauld, C. F. (2005). Habits of mind, scholarship and decision making in science and religion. Science & Education, 14(3-5), 291-308.
- Tenelshof, J. (1999). Encouraging the character formation of future Christian leaders. Journal of the Evangelical Theological Society, 42(1), 77.
- Accident essays
- Awareness essays
- Benefits of Volunteering essays
- Challenges essays
- Childhood Memories essays
- Decision essays
- Driving essays
- Event essays
- Excellence essays
- Expectations essays
- Failure essays
- Farewell essays
- Flight essays
- Gift essays
- Growing Up essays
- Ignorance essays
- Improve essays
- Incident essays
- Knowledge essays
- Luck essays
- Memories essays
- Mistake essays
- Obstacles essays
- Overcoming Challenges essays
- Party essays
- Peace Corps essays
- Personal Experience essays
- Problems essays
- Sacrifices essays
- Struggle essays
- Success essays
- Trust essays
- Vacation essays
- Visit essays
- Volunteering essays
- All About Me essays
- Personal Growth essays
- Personal Values essays
- Strengths And Weaknesses essays