What’s the Deal With the London Olympic Mascots? Essay Example
The introduction of the Rorschach test-like logo for the 2012 London Olympics garnered criticism for resembling a distorted swastika or something suggestive. However, the controversy surrounding the logo pales in comparison to the outcry that erupted with the unveiling of the Olympic mascots for the same event. Dubbed Wenlock and Mandeville, these mascots are far from conventional, unlike previous Olympic game mascots such as bears, otters, owls, and eagles. Wenlock and Mandeville are sleek, futuristic, and metallic-looking cyclops creatures. Although their creators claim they represent drops of steel with camera eyes, it's challenging to decipher their appearance at first sight. Additionally, these mascots are unique in that they must cater to both children and depict their home country, which is a perplexing epithet.
The representation of the United Kingdom by drops of steel with camera eyes raises
...questions. Are these camera eyes meant to bring to mind the controversial security cameras that surveil every outdoor Londoner? If so, why draw attention to this? The mascots were created based on an extensive study by the Olympic organizing committee into what types of characters appeal to children. The research indicated that modern children prefer non-animal characters with a high-tech appearance, and also value strong storylines over mere cuteness. To fulfill this desire for narrative, the committee has given Wenlock and Mandeville Facebook pages where children can virtually interact with them and construct their own story.
The aim is to transform static mascots into virtual companions that children relate to and want to learn more about. Despite lacking defining traits, children are expected to find them attractive. Whether these endeavors prove fruitful remains uncertain. Will kids genuinely desire to
engage with these two creations of a marketing group online? If yes, will their eagerness for interaction convert into enthusiasm for the games? If the mascots fail, will it be due to the notion of high-tech mascots being a flawed concept or because these specific high-tech mascots lack wit or appeal?
- Movies essays
- Music essays
- Celebrity essays
- Television essays
- Actors essays
- Roller coaster essays
- Magic essays
- Media essays
- Video Game essays
- Wall Street essays
- Dead Poets Society essays
- A beautiful mind essays
- Sherlock Holmes essays
- Our day out essays
- American Beauty essays
- Do The Right Thing essays
- Forrest Gump essays
- Good Will Hunting essays
- Finding Forrester essays
- Looking For Alibrandi essays
- On The Waterfront essays
- One Flew Over The Cuckoo'S Nest essays
- Rabbit Proof Fence essays
- Remember The Titans essays
- Schindler'S List essays
- Shawshank Redemption essays
- The Blind Side essays
- Titanic essays
- Witness essays
- The Veil essays
- Blade Runner essays
- Monster essays
- The Graduate essays
- Twilight essays
- West Side Story essays
- Like Water For Chocolate essays
- Glory essays
- Superman essays
- Moulin rouge essays
- American Films essays
- Cinema Of The United States essays
- English-Language Films essays
- Film Editing essays
- Film Noir essays
- Film Techniques essays
- Horror essays
- Bollywood essays
- The time essays
- Saving private ryan essays
- The hunger games essays