Unocal in Burma Essay Example

their intentions were to strengthen the economy in Burma in order to provide better conditions for its people. In actuality, their actions only strengthened the militaries government and widened the gap for Burmese human rights. Unsocial interactions in Burma may have made living conditions slightly better, but the ends did not Justify the meaner. By proceeding with their plans, Unsocial was basically implying that they supported the policies of COLORS. When Unsocial made its decision to proceed with plans, they believed that the benefits outweighed the costs.

According to Velasquez (2012), utilitarianism can be defined as a process in determining the morally right decision by a meaner of weighing costs and benefits. The route that maintains the greatest amount of benefits with the least amount of cost is the morally right course of action (p. 78). When taking into account harm done to human lives, it seems that this formula might fall short. Based on Unsocial actions, one can conclude that they failed o calculate the costs of injuries and human rights violations.

I believe that those costs are immeasurable and no amount of profitability Justifies violating basic human rights. If Unsocial were to use the rule-utilitarian model, then they probably would have abstained any involvement. Velasquez (2012) states that rule-utilitarianism meaner that an action is only right if it first abides by correct moral rules. If the initial action is not morally responsible, then the cost immediately outweighs the benefits, despite overall utility.