Torture and It`s Worth for Information Essay Example

but they used information that was obtained through torture. Most of the civilians struggle while putting the suspected terrorist on the stand.

Not all cruelty torture that they may introduce information that is needed either by the country or by the nation. The Senate report found that seven of the thirty-nine detainees were subjected to scratch methods, but they produced none of the information after the interrogation. But also, the Senate says that even after the interrogation is done and the terrorist treated harshly they never follow the information. Sarcastically, the largest finding from the real- world test was that questioning afflict does not bear any fruits. Pointing at the case of Abu Zubaydah who was the first detainee the CIA itself used improved methods. After that, the FBI questioned him in the hospital, they received a lot of information of valuable intelligence, and after the interrogation, and they were dismissed due to fewer brutality techniques that they used. In Israel is the only place that has openly moderate physical pressure as a last resort. Lastly, when the interrogators used that method they argued that fleeting a clear law will make it possible to set the some bound.

In the 1970s, the Britain used related methods against the suspected terrorists that were in the Northern Ireland. These techniques were banned in 1978 after they received a case from the Republic of Ireland to the European Court of human rights. The court said that such methods were not meant to the human being. Therefore, in 2002 the international court of ex-Yugoslavia in The Hague strong-willed that extended fugitive incarceration comprises torture. Such rulings did not prevent America choice

from such harsh methods when questioning rebel terrorist in other countries. In the case of the person who explodes the bomb in the public is the only person who knows whereabouts. The person is held by the police and he has to write a statement about the bomb that exploded in the public. Therefore, the police will torture the person till they get the person who did it. In this, there are ways to justify the specific time pressure and the knowledge to get the full information about the scenario. Secondly, the man is powerfully understood to be guilty, therefore, deserves to be punished for the events. In most cases, the intelligence agencies collect information that some of them are not true about the situation concerned. This may lead to taking information about the wrong person and it become injustice to torture the person who is not guilty in the act (Wisnewski, Jeremy, 2010).

In most cases, the time span of the event that does occur is not well known. However, the time limit is what justifies the scenario while any evasive action can be reasonable through time anxiety to accurate information. The useful attitude applies in the imaginary situation where one person is tortured and saves more lives; though tormenting somebody causes them to feel the physical pain. Therefore, this helps significant offset of torturing one person and put in temporary pain where he the rescues life of many people. The human being life is very exceptional, and it should be pleased with honor, it is not acceptable for personal being to be tormented like the terrorist who is tortured to get information. However, torture

interferes with the liberty that all human being deserves as self- sufficient being. When a victim is released he suffers a long-term injury, this is because this controlling mind and bodies have broken his identity. Most of them are released, and they do not work well in the in the human race some became strange and other may suffer from shock (Bernstein, J M. Torture, and Dignity 2015).

There is no determination to end the torture, like in the physical punishment we know very well someone is guilty and is punished for the wrong done. Not like for the terrorist who is punished for the interrogator to get the clear information of the act done. Even if the terrorist is correct or not the democratic remains on duty to defend the nation. In this case, individual are unable to protect themselves from the terrorists thus, the self-Governing State takes over. The terrorist is not safe from the government, and he is not allocated to any social privileges. Like in Nelson Mandela’s case, he was notably considered as the terrorist while on the other side he was a freedom fighter. This also happens to most of the terrorist who are tortured of doing nothing in mind. If the terrorist is approved to be free after the interrogators have received all the information, his fellow may kill the terrorist. That is why torture does not work on each occasion. Sometimes torture acts as a deterrent to other people; this is because the painful outcome of one’s actions is better prevention than captivity. Fear is frequently used as the successful motivator. Torture can be accepted but be controlled to

prevent unnecessary, inhumane techniques that may occur.

References

• Bernstein, J M. Torture, and Dignity: An Essay on Moral Injury, 2015.
  Schiemann, John W. Does Torture Work 2016. Print.
• Wisnewski, Jeremy. Understanding Torture. Edinburgh: Edinburgh University Press, 2010.
  Internet resource.