Arthur Balfour and the Defeat of Conservatives in 1906 Election
To what extent did Arthur Balfour cause the defeat of the conservatives in the 1906 election? Arthur Balfour was elected as prime minister in 1902 after Salisbury retired and gained the approval of the unionists, even though it appeared to quite a few people in the parliament that Arthur Balfour wasn’t actually up to the job. Many say that the Tariff reform was his down fall in the long run but it is debatable. He steered the Education act through parliament, which benefited a lot of people.Even though he took on the tariff reform he knew the risks, which was carried with it, but chose to try and change it.
Many people disliked Balfour because of his involvement in Chinese labour. He allowed a large number of Chinese labourers to work in South Africa goldmines in terrible conditions for seriously low pay. This caused a h
...umongous outrage back in England. The public were afraid that his involvement in Chinese labour would end up bringing it to Britain.
Trade unions believed the conservatives were against them after the judgement in the tariff vale case.The 1906 election was a landslide defeat for the conservative party. The liberals were lead by the sitting minority prime minister Henry Campbell Bannerman and they won a large majority in the election. The primary reason for the defeat was the split among the conservative party over the free trade.
Before Arthur Balfour became prime minister, Britain had led the world in industry and manufacturing but now other major countries like the USA and Germany were beginning to overtake Britain’s industry in some major areas.Conservatives had believed Britain’s prosperity came from free trade
but other countries now putting tariffs on goods from Britain. Chamberlain proposed tariffs on goods coming from abroad thought there should be preferential tariffs for goods coming from colonies. This abandonment of free trade split the party e.
g. Chamberlain resigned and Churchill went over to the Liberals. So already cracks were beginning to show within the conservative party based around Tariff reforms.So it didn’t help when a man came to power, who according to the majorities opinion thought that he wasn’t really up to the job. The liberals gained 397 seats in parliament where as the conservatives only gained 156 seats.
In my opinion I think that to a large extent Arthur Balfour caused the defeat in the 1906 election because he took on the Tariff reform and he had didn’t really know what he was getting himself in to. Balfour's handling of the response to the bill encountered criticism from within the party and a BMG (Balfour Must Go) movement got under way.In 1911, citing age as a reason, an exasperated Balfour resigned the leadership. It is perhaps surprising that he held on to the leadership for as long as he did, carrying on for six years after the party had lost office. I think that Arthur Balfour had a bad reputation right from the start and the public were wary of him coming into such high power in Britain.
Also I think the public never really trusted him after it came about, that he was involved in Chinese labour. However he did earn some loyalty after he pushed the education act forward.Although, I think that the tariff reform was his major downfall
and cost him the election and also cost his fellow MP’s loss of office. He attempted to restore order among the tariff reform act and failed.
The risks were far to great in the end. In conclusion I think that Arthur Balfour was mainly to blames for the conservatives losing the general election in 1906. I think this because he wasn’t up for the job in the first place and this cause repercussions among the conservatives because his heart wasn’t in it.Also he took on something that had more risks than it did rewards.
Although it took a lot of courage to take it on and try and change Tariff reform for the better, it just didn’t pay off for the conservatives in the end and before Arthur Balfour even came to power there were cracks beginning to show among the party over free trade, and they needed a leader who was really dedicated and I think that Arthur Balfour wasn’t prepared for it.
- Federal government essays
- Armed Forces essays
- Confederate States Of America essays
- Federal Government Of The United States essays
- Fourteenth Amendment To The United States Constitution essays
- Governance essays
- Parliament essays
- Politics essays
- Jurisdiction essays
- Bureaucracy essays
- Separation Of Powers essays
- Congress essays
- President essays
- United States Congress essays
- Non-Commissioned Officer essays
- Appeal essays
- Revenge essays
- Corporate Governance essays
- Public Service essays
- Income Tax essays
- Supply essays
- Red Cross essays
- Democracy essays
- State essays
- Liberty essays
- Absolutism essays
- Reform essays
- Republic essays
- John Marshall essays
- Bourgeoisie essays
- Developed Country essays
- Elections essays
- International Relations essays
- Left-Wing Politics essays
- Monarchy essays
- Political Corruption essays
- Political Party essays
- Political Science essays
- Sovereign State essays
- United Nations essays
- World Trade Organization essays
- Contras essays
- Dictatorship essays
- Foreign policy essays
- Monarch essays
- Corruption essays
- Foreign essays
- Democratic Party essays
- European Union essays
- President Of The United States essays