The Speckled Bank vs The Lamb to the Slaughter Essay Example

a tough demeanor, and may even be oblivious to his own strength. Roylott had a motive for his actions; if either of his stepdaughters married, he would be required to pay £1000 each year. Additionally, he is able to shift responsibility onto the gypsies whom he permits to use his land.

The culprit in The Lamb to the Slaughter stands out for several reasons. Notably, she is a pregnant police officer's spouse. While The Speckled Band revolves around identifying the killer of a daughter, The Lamb to the Slaughter's suspense lies in whether or not the perpetrator will be apprehended. Furthermore, the story's irony stems from the fact that she uses a leg of lamb to end her husband's life and the investigating officers unknowingly consume the evidence.

A policeman eating the leg of lamb said, "I bet it's right under our noses" about the murder weapon, making the police appear foolish. The two murders, one in The Speckled Bank and the other in The Lamb to the Slaughter, were different in planning, victim gender, and motive. The Speckled Bank was motivated by greed, while The Lamb to the Slaughter was driven by anger after hearing bad news.

The Lamb to the Slaughter and The Speckled Bank portray different views on characters and their actions. The husband in The Lamb to the Slaughter may have instigated the attack, but it's uncertain as the audience is left unaware of what was said. In contrast, Julia Stoner is completely innocent. Though some may pity Mary Maloney, the same doesn't apply to Roylott. Additionally, the portrayal of the police contrasts in the two stories with The Lamb to the Slaughter depicting

them as unintelligent while Sherlock Holmes is showcased in The Speckled Bank using his deduction skills to solve both mysteries. To further support this idea, Sherlock Holmes is described using lengthy words and admired for his ability to analyze a situation.

Holmes demonstrates his perceptiveness early on when he observes Helen's reaction to discovering her injured wrist. This indicates his sharp attention to detail. In contrast, the murder case Holmes investigates involves a more intricate approach involving a venomous serpent, surpassing the simplicity of using a leg of lamb as a weapon.

In The Lamb to the Slaughter, unlike in The Speckled Band, the police did not focus on identifying the perpetrator because the victim was a police officer who had numerous adversaries. The officer did not suspect Mary due to their previous acquaintance and his prejudiced attitude. Additionally, he lacked creativity in locating the murder weapon. The most prominent difference between the narratives is that one murderer successfully committed the crime while the other did not.

While The Speckled Bank provides a comprehensive explanation, The Lamb to the Slaughter leaves one pondering about the husband's words that drove Mary to commit the murder.