The Double Citizenship of Human Existence Essay Example
The Double Citizenship of Human Existence Essay Example

The Double Citizenship of Human Existence Essay Example

Available Only on StudyHippo
  • Pages: 4 (855 words)
  • Published: April 17, 2017
  • Type: Case Study
View Entire Sample
Text preview

Immanuel Kant's theory of knowledge has had a significant impact on contemporary Western philosophy. Kant posits that, although we lack direct experience of the world, we depend on cognitive concepts to interpret our experiences. He divides objects into two distinct realms: phenomena and noumena. Phenomena are objects construed in accordance with certain categories, whereas noumena are objects of comprehension that cannot be directly perceived through the senses.

According to Kant, our experience is shaped by the basic categories of our understanding of time and space, as we process our intuition in the form of phenomena. He believes that the objects we perceive are genuine and not merely products of our imagination. Kant argues that our knowledge is limited to what we perceive, defining phenomena as the foundation to our understanding of reality, as it is filtered through cognitive mechanisms.

...

These filters are essential to make sense of the world; otherwise, it would be incomprehensible. Essentially, according to Kant, removing the condition of sensibility would obliterate the essence of reality itself.

According to CPR: 271, the world of sense is confined to the infinite void. Without acknowledging this and the importance of space as a precondition for phenomena, the world of sense cannot exist. Phenomena refers to our limited understanding of things based on our perceptual capabilities. This means that we require the cognitive concept of time to discern events happening around us, and therefore, cannot attain knowledge of anything beyond time.

The concept of infinity, which is described as timeless and without beginning or end, is difficult to understand without the use of time. Cognitive concepts are helpful in understanding the world according to Kant's theory which primaril

View entire sample
Join StudyHippo to see entire essay

relies on sense perception. However, Kant believed in the existence of a separate realm called noumena that goes beyond the physical realm perceived by our senses where things exist as they truly are.

Kant posits that our intellect is the sole way in which we can understand the noumenal realm. Although there are entities beyond our perception, they cannot be apprehended in the noumenal realm. This is because we only encounter phenomena - that which appears to us. However, it is necessary to grasp the world as we perceive it with noumena.

In spite of various factors affecting people's perception, such as position in relation to an object, the fact remains that there exists a true form of the object beyond any differences in color, shape, and/or texture experienced by individuals. Kant identifies three main modes of consciousness: Knowing, feeling, and desiring. These modes relate to understanding, judgment, and reasoning, respectively. Feeling serves as a link between noumena, understanding, reasoning, and phenomena.

Kant proposes the existence of an intermediate space between ethics and science, referred to as aesthetics. This realm comprises of beauty and sublimity present in both nature and art. Kant extends his theory on judgment further by elucidating on natural philosophy which deals with theoretical concepts of nature based on pure reason and understanding. Conversely, moral philosophy involves freedom and action concepts, exclusively relying on practical reasoning.

The realm of the supersensible is populated by concepts, encompassing a shift from tangible sensory experiences - or phenomena - to abstract insights, referred to as noumena. These insights revolve around the notion of purpose, which resides beyond the realms of both factual truth and morality. Purpose is

only attainable through judgment, being the sole holder of ultimate truth.

According to the definition, judgment involves encompassing the specific into the general. There are two kinds of judgment: determinant judgment, which involves a pre-existing generalization, and reflective judgment, which only deals with the specific. Life has two types of meanings added beforehand to events, things, and actions. The theoretical purpose of nature relies on the transcendental principle, while the practical purpose of free will comes from the metaphysical principle.

The purposiveness of nature serves as the connection between the sensible and supersensible, enabling transformation. Kant asserts that the fact of moral agency can prove freedom and the condition of free will in discussions of morality. Kant proposes that moral actions contain their own antinomy between causal determination and freedom, further substantiating his grounding of free will.

According to Kant, for an action to have real-world consequences and be morally sound, it must be performed without external influence. To achieve this, both causality and freedom are required. One's existence can be viewed in two ways: operating within causal regularities in the phenomenal realm, or as a completely free entity in the noumenal realm. However, it is important to understand that one's existence simultaneously encompasses both realms: sensibly determined yet intelligibly free. This pertains to both the phenomena and noumena.

We, as individuals with citizenship in two worlds, must ensure the alignment of both realms. A skilled architect must consider both aesthetic appeal and adherence to the laws of nature when designing a house. In order to succeed, the house must work harmoniously with both phenomena and noumena. Kant's theory of morality also applies to this principle. To live in

the world properly, one's noumena and phenomena must work in unison to create an appropriate moral code.

Get an explanation on any task
Get unstuck with the help of our AI assistant in seconds
New