Which of these court cases led to the advent of the Robin Hood reformers ?

Serrano vs. Priest More test answers on https://studyhippo.com/chapter-7-financing-and-governing-american-schools/

The calendar on which court cases are scheduled for trial is called A. the judicial timetable. B. the trial calendar. C. the court docket. D. none of the above.

the court docket p 187 More test answers on https://studyhippo.com/intro-to-criminal-justice-ch-8-through-ch-14/

Which of the following court cases determined that “separate-but-equal” education is illegal? a) Honing v. Doe, (1988) b) Diana v. State Board of Education, (1970) c) Brown v. Board of Education, (1954) d) Larry P. v. Riles, (1977)

c) Brown v. Board of Education, (1954) More test answers on https://studyhippo.com/essay-educ-413-midterm/

What percentage of court cases at the federal level are disposed of by plea bargaining? A. 65% B. 75% C. 97% D. 85%

97.00% More test answers on https://studyhippo.com/intro-to-criminal-justice-ch-8-through-ch-14/

Court cases have determined that hate speech on campus can only be restricted if it

has been proven to inflict harm. More test answers on https://studyhippo.com/acc-gov-ch-16/

Why were few court cases won against monopolies and trusts during the Gilded Age?

Monopolies and trusts were supported by the federal courts. More test answers on https://studyhippo.com/reforming-business-and-government-3-4575/

Courts of limited jurisdiction are A. not courts of record. B. courts that prepare for very long trials. C. court cases using jurors. D. courts that always provide paid legal counsel.

not courts of record. More test answers on https://studyhippo.com/intro-to-criminal-justice-ch-8-through-ch-14/

Legal Precedents (court cases)

•Tarasoff Case: Duty to warn of harm to self or others; Duty to protect •Hedlund Case: Extends duty to warn to anyone who might be near the intended victim and who might also be in danger More test answers on https://studyhippo.com/590-unit-2/

3 major cases 1. NFIB National Federation Independent Business v Sebelius – individual mandate was allowed, Medicaid Expansion upheld and upheld but limited 2. Hobby Lobby – contraception, religiously owned exempt from contraception mandate 3. King v Burwell – subsidies for state-exchanges, bad wording meant for all exchanges More test answers on https://studyhippo.com/exam-3-sys-affordable-care-act-2/

Home Page Arts And Humanities English Linguistics Court Cases

Court Cases Flashcards, test questions and answers

Discover flashcards, test exam answers, and assignments to help you learn more about Court Cases and other subjects. Don’t miss the chance to use them for more effective college education. Use our database of questions and answers on Court Cases and get quick solutions for your test.

What is Court Cases?

Court cases are important in any democratic society. They allow individuals to have access to justice and ensure that disputes are resolved fairly. Court cases also set precedents, providing guidance on how similar cases should be handled in the future. Additionally, court cases can help shape public opinion and create national conversations around specific issues.In a court case, one or more parties bring a complaint against another party with the intention of obtaining some form of relief or remedy. The parties involved must present evidence and arguments as part of the proceedings. The judge then evaluates the evidence and makes a ruling based on applicable law, precedent, or even their own personal opinion. In criminal law matters, this ruling may take the form of a conviction or an acquittal depending on whether the accused is found guilty beyond reasonable doubt. In civil law matters, the court may grant monetary damages or issue an injunction ordering one party to do something (or stop doing something). The outcome of a court case is often appealed by one (or both) parties involved if they disagree with the decision reached by the judge at trial level. Depending on the type of case being appealed (and its legal complexity), appeals can be heard in increasingly higher courts until they reach either their final resolution or become subject to further review by higher courts such as state supreme courts or even federal appellate courts like those housed within U.S Supreme Court building in Washington D.C.