Which of these court cases led to the advent of the Robin Hood reformers ?

Serrano vs. Priest More test answers on https://studyhippo.com/chapter-7-financing-and-governing-american-schools/

The calendar on which court cases are scheduled for trial is called A. the judicial timetable. B. the trial calendar. C. the court docket. D. none of the above.

the court docket p 187 More test answers on https://studyhippo.com/intro-to-criminal-justice-ch-8-through-ch-14/

Which of the following court cases determined that “separate-but-equal” education is illegal? a) Honing v. Doe, (1988) b) Diana v. State Board of Education, (1970) c) Brown v. Board of Education, (1954) d) Larry P. v. Riles, (1977)

c) Brown v. Board of Education, (1954) More test answers on https://studyhippo.com/essay-educ-413-midterm/

What percentage of court cases at the federal level are disposed of by plea bargaining? A. 65% B. 75% C. 97% D. 85%

97.00% More test answers on https://studyhippo.com/intro-to-criminal-justice-ch-8-through-ch-14/

Court cases have determined that hate speech on campus can only be restricted if it

has been proven to inflict harm. More test answers on https://studyhippo.com/acc-gov-ch-16/

Why were few court cases won against monopolies and trusts during the Gilded Age?

Monopolies and trusts were supported by the federal courts. More test answers on https://studyhippo.com/reforming-business-and-government-3-4575/

Courts of limited jurisdiction are A. not courts of record. B. courts that prepare for very long trials. C. court cases using jurors. D. courts that always provide paid legal counsel.

not courts of record. More test answers on https://studyhippo.com/intro-to-criminal-justice-ch-8-through-ch-14/

Legal Precedents (court cases)

•Tarasoff Case: Duty to warn of harm to self or others; Duty to protect •Hedlund Case: Extends duty to warn to anyone who might be near the intended victim and who might also be in danger More test answers on https://studyhippo.com/590-unit-2/

3 major cases 1. NFIB National Federation Independent Business v Sebelius – individual mandate was allowed, Medicaid Expansion upheld and upheld but limited 2. Hobby Lobby – contraception, religiously owned exempt from contraception mandate 3. King v Burwell – subsidies for state-exchanges, bad wording meant for all exchanges More test answers on https://studyhippo.com/exam-3-sys-affordable-care-act-2/