Spirit of the beehive Essay Example
Spirit of the beehive Essay Example

Spirit of the beehive Essay Example

Available Only on StudyHippo
Topics:
  • Pages: 4 (1049 words)
  • Published: February 11, 2018
  • Type: Essay
View Entire Sample
Text preview

Ana spends most of the film visiting an abandoned barn where her sister has led her to believe that's where the spirit lives.

Ana is told that she can't see the spirit she just has to believe and call to it. Later on in the film when a soldier from the war uses the barn as shelter Ana believes it's the spirit. It's at this point in the film where Ana's worlds really combine. She starts to lose sight of what is reality and what is fantasy. From a viewer's standpoint it is possible to lose sight of that as well.

I have a hard time agreeing with the Idea that "everything In a film Is fake," especially In The Split of the Beehive.

This film plays with what is real and what Is fake In many different ways. Mo

...

st of these ways we watch through Ana. I don't think the film Itself Is "fake" Just because it contains objects outside of reality. Ana meeting the soldier in the barn is probably the most serious claim for imagination in the film. Ana truly believes that this random soldier is the spirit she has basically been worshipping all movie long.

When her father plays the pocket watch at the table you can see the distress on Ana's face.

It's almost like she knows what has happened and blames her own father. At this moment in the film you really have to open your eyes to what reality really is. These two worlds of fantasy and real life almost combine into reality. Ana thinks that her father has destroyed this spirit and In reality It wasn't

View entire sample
Join StudyHippo to see entire essay

necessarily her father that did it, but it did happen. That brings a really Important question to the table. Where Is the line between reality and fantasy?

The Devil's Backbone Is another film that goes Into the Idea of reality and fantasy meshing together.

Carols being dropped off at an orphanage with no idea why is enough trouble for him in the movie alone. Early on in the movie we learn about Santa who ends up being the ghost like boy throughout the film. The most difficult part of determining what is real and what is unreal in this film is the fact that Santa as alive at one point. We don't see him alive but we know he was. This really makes one think about how his character is portrayed.

There is no doubt he is portrayed as a ghost in the film but in the end it is for a good reason.

He just wants revenge on Action and he uses Carols to get it. In my opinion this film was one of the realest fake movies Vive ever seen. By that I mean, almost everything In this movie Is real. Santa was a real boy and everything that happens In the movie Is because of events that happened that doesn't really have to do with fantasy. This Is one film that really makes you think about reality.

Santa dying wasn't because of any kind of spiritual or artificial doing. And that really reason.

Looking at both of these movies together and comparing and contrasting them, it is easy to find some similarities and differences. Similarly both movies use the idea of fantasy

and spirits. Both of them involve young children believing in these fantasies.

This is necessary to make the film work because they are Just kids and no one believes in fantasies more than children. However with the first film The Spirit of the Beehive, Ana tends to believe more in a "spirit" rather than Carols in The Devil's Backbone. The thing with Ana is she never really sees this spirit.

She thinks she does when she finds the soldier and that is proof enough for her. But in reality he is just a soldier and no one understands what Ana is going through after the pocket watch is played at the table. Carols on the other hand actually sees the spirit of Santa.

Santa was actually alive and actually turns into a spirit. Carols had contact with Santa and even tryst to communicate with him. Question Five The film Après Maim has different ways of approaching cinema and art in general. The two main ways they do this is through the main character Gilles and his two religions he has throughout the movie.

These two women are almost shown as images for Gilles and the cinema. Baddie goes on to say "In "mass art" we have the paradoxical relation between a pure democratic element (on the side of irruption and eventual energy) and an aristocratic element (on the side of individual education, of differential locations of taste). " With that being said Laurel the first of the two girlfriends would be referred to as the "democratic element" and Christine being referred to as the "aristocratic element. " Laurel would be referred to this way cause

with her "image" she is almost a silenced reality.

With her leaving early on in the film it brings light to our main character Gilles. Once she is out of the picture Gilles almost becomes a different person with all of the rioting and underground work he gets involved in.

This is where Christine comes into the picture. She is into all of this with Gilles and that's really how they meet. Christine is more interested in the idea of documenting. So when Gilles gets involved in this different lifestyle Christine almost becomes a part of it and almost documents it with him. She as an mage seems to struggle with reality.

She's not very politically involved, almost the opposite of Laurel.

I think it is clear to see that they can be maintained in a dialectical tension. When applying this film to the category of "mass art" Lain Bodacious article Cinema as Democratic Emblem, helps that by explaining "an art is a "mass art" if the masterpieces, the artistic productions that the erudite (or dominant, whatever) culture declares incontestable, are seen and liked by millions of people from all social groups at the very moment of their creation. " This film itself in my opinion is insider mass art.

Get an explanation on any task
Get unstuck with the help of our AI assistant in seconds
New