Research Technology Essay Example

These actions provide evidence for the deteriorating state of the planet.

From this perspective, I have two main concerns. Firstly, portraying Earth as a patient in a hospital bed fails to address the causes behind its illness. Instead, it solely focuses on the effects without acknowledging those responsible for causing destruction or the victims who suffer as a consequence. Despite efforts made towards restoring environmental health, they often go unnoticed due to development taking priority over environmental concerns – highlighting an ongoing issue.

The representation of Earth in intensive care perpetuates ambiguity and fails to acknowledge the efforts made by its "doctors" to diagnose and treat its ailments. Instead, it reinforces their authority and control over our planet. This image intensifies the need for a global solution to environmental degradation that multinational interests seek to influence.

International institutions and national governments bear responsibility for addressing this issue. The dialogue between different social classes and elites is highlighted by Etc staff (2003).During the Industrial Revolution in the English Midlands in 1812, textile workers defended their jobs by sabotaging machinery, resulting in the execution of leaders like Ned Ululated. Those who opposed new technological advancements were often labeled as "Ululated," demonstrating how advanced machinery disrupted working families and caused widespread starvation. This shift is exemplified by Eli Whitney's cotton gin leading to cotton production moving to the southern US, and power looms replacing traditional handlooms in India. The progress and development that led to the destruction of cotton weavers' livelihoods in India were unstoppable. Despite the influence of British mill owners and American slave owners, India remained strong in competition within the textile industry due to its higher quality cloth

at lower prices. In an effort to safeguard their own progressive development, British agents imposed impossible production quotas on Indian weavers and confiscated their goods when these quotas weren't met. Meanwhile, Britain's Industrial Revolution brought immense wealth and increased life expectancy. The drop in textile prices made them affordable for even those from poorer backgrounds or middle class households. However, this affordability was not seen in India where growing inequality overshadowed the initial benefits of industrial development according to The Economist during the mid-19th century.The argument can be made that prioritizing social well-being would have better supported industrial development, according to Richard Booking (2006). In the past, there was a belief in collective ownership of everything as common property for all individuals worldwide. However, this concept has been gradually limited by national and tribal boundaries through forceful enforcement and poverty constraints. Various methods are used to impose these limitations, such as leases granted by governments and authorities. The commons can exist in different forms, whether it be individuals or groups of people. The main challenge arises from the growing population and the need to allocate rights to shared resources. Laws and regulations regulate access to these resources by granting specific ownership rights to individuals. For instance, even the air we breathe is considered a communal resource that is controlled and regulated by authorities.

According to Neocolonialism and Fraud (2007), environmental degradation primarily stems from political issues related to excessive use of Earth's resources and its impact on greenhouse gas emissions. Unfortunately, the Kyoto Protocol has largely failed in addressing these crucial matters because it grants industrial corporations quasi-property rights over the atmosphere, which encourages increased carbon

emissions. This initial step of the Toto protocol is dangerous as it leads to the creation of a new carbon-industrial complex that prohibits international carbon trading.Carolyn suggests that there is always a risk of certain effects, such as the resurgence of diseases like tuberculosis. A report released in 2000 by the National and International Society of Sciences and the Institute of Medicine warned that the United States must maintain or even intensify its efforts in tuberculosis control. The current question for the United States is whether it will once again disregard this issue or take decisive action to eradicate the disease.

Almost half of the patients were natives of three countries that are now being scrutinized in terms of earth degradation and "sustainable development". It is crucial to examine the importance of the planet and its representation as a patient, as this draws attention to the magnitude and significance of ecological deterioration.

Tropical forests are rapidly disappearing or drying up, equivalent to a football field being destroyed every minute. The planet is being contaminated by toxic wastes and polluted land, impacting rivers and seas. Fishing grounds are collapsing, global warming is intensifying, and farmland is deteriorating. Such destruction validates our perception of our planet as a patient.

According to Richard and Levine (2009), progress in developing nations is often viewed as linear advancement from less developed to more developed stages. The goal is to swiftly revolutionize and reshape society along this progression axis.The blind embrace of "modern" science and technology raises questions about its consequences. It fails to acknowledge that the advancement of technology is influenced by capitalist control over labor, commodification desires, intellectual climate for scientists, and

inherited knowledge and ignorance from previous works. This perspective is neglected by the mainstream view of the revolution. The Kyoto Protocol does not sufficiently address these issues and gives industrial corporations too much freedom in increasing carbon emissions. It is seen as a dangerous step towards creating a new carbon-industrial complex, which is internationally prohibited from participating in carbon trading. Our society heavily relies on substantial amounts of energy with global dependence on fossil fuels such as oil, gas, and coal steadily growing.

Industrialized nations in Western Europe, North America, China, India heavily depend on fossil fuels while developing nations are also increasing their usage. According to Nicholas (2001), addressing climate change plays a crucial role in protecting the environment through promoting sustainable development. Emphasizing the significance of ecological degradation and its impact on our planet is important. Tropical forests are rapidly being destroyed or dried out at an alarming rate - equivalent to losing a football field every minute.Pollution from hazardous waste and contaminated land worsens the condition of Earth's rivers and seas. The comparison of Earth to a patient in a hospital bed overlooks the causes of its illness and only focuses on the visible effects of environmental damage. It neglects the responsibility of those who are causing destruction and those who are affected by it. Despite potential solutions to improve our planet, they seem to go unnoticed.

In his 2007 article, Larry explains that in the past, society did not have one owner for everything. Defining what we are discussing and why it is significant is important. "The Commons" was a term used in medieval England to refer to parcels of land collectively

used by peasant farmers. These farmers relied on access to shared resources such as grazing land, water sources like streams and wells, as well as wood and fuel from forests since they owned limited land themselves.

The survival of the population depended on this land, leading recognized courts to establish strict rules requiring landowners to maintain access to commons for peasant farmers' use. Accessing the commons was taken for granted as a right similar to our assumed right to breathe air. Peasants themselves determined how the commons were utilized and distributed among those who needed it for survival in a fair manner.

The concept of property extends beyond owning land; it encompasses a collection of rights that often take precedence over actual land ownership.However, with the growth of the population and the granting of rights to common people by government authorities, a crucial issue arises. Laws and regulations determine access to these rights, but often people overlook their possession of them. This raises the question of whether the air we breathe is truly free. In my viewpoint, just as common rights are granted, authorities also grant the right to clean air.

According to Larry Ionian in 2008, there is a focus on reducing greenhouse gas emissions and establishing a necessary framework for future international climate change agreements. It is essential that a new international framework be negotiated and ratified by the end of the first commitment period of the Kyoto Protocol in 2012, in response to the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change's call for significant emission reductions. This framework aims to mitigate the adverse effects of climate change and support efforts to enhance resilience against its impacts.

To provide

financial support for adaptation projects and programs in developing countries that are Parties to the Kyoto Protocol, an Adaptation Fund was established. The Fund primarily relies on funding from a share of proceeds generated by Clean Development Mechanism (CDM) project activities.

Mark James (1999) emphasizes the importance of ecosystem ecology concerning environmental degradation and stresses addressing this issue as crucial for environmental protection.He highlights the importance of understanding the CEO system and its role in protecting the environment. However, we, as observers, are not involved in decision-making regarding the "fate of the planet." Instead, we are given a narrative that supports the current state of affairs and empowers those who manage our world. The depiction of environmental degradation is presented as a global issue without any action being taken. In Chapter #3 Methodology of this project, I will conduct qualitative research using interviews and questionnaires. The questionnaires will be distributed to instructors and students in Pakistan's Environment Protection Department to explore how technology is impacting the environment. To ensure accuracy, primary data from surveys and interviews with individuals from diverse backgrounds, particularly those affiliated with Pakistan's environment department, will be used. Furthermore, secondary sources like published articles by previous researchers will support my own findings. This study will take place between November 2012 to April 2013. The data sources for this research include internet resources as a secondary source and primary data obtained through interviews and questionnaires conducted among students and teachers in ELSE's environmental department and environmental impact assessment department.The target population for this study is 100 individuals, including instructors and students from ELSE and CUP. The chosen analysis technique is cross tabulation, which effectively

examines the impact of technology on the environment. Data will be analyzed using SPAS statistical software and entered into an excel sheet. The researcher's interpretation of the data is crucial in the analysis. Additionally, correlation analysis will determine the relationship between technology and its environmental impact. According to the research hypothesis, industrial smoke, carbon emissions, fossil fuels, and hybrid cars are independent variables while the environment is the dependent variable. For fossil fuels specifically, the null hypothesis suggests no effect on the environment while alternative hypothesis proposes that it does have an effect. The null hypothesis states that hybrid cars are not environmentally friendly while the alternative hypothesis argues that they are. Similarly, for carbon emissions, the null hypothesis assumes no impact on the environment while alternative hypothesis contends that it does have an effect. Lastly, for industrial smoke, the null hypothesis assumes no environmental impact while alternative hypothesis posits that it does affect the environment.