Part of the problem or solution Essay

essay B
  • Words: 3001
  • Category: Business

  • Pages: 11

Get Full Essay

Get access to this section to get all the help you need with your essay and educational goals.

Get Access


This term paper focuses on the undermentioned topic:

Multinational companies – portion of the job or portion of the solution?

Researching this subject, I will chiefly concentrate on drive forces behind the denationalization of norms in the planetary political economic system in relation to the rise of TNCs and the most important issues in the execution of codifications of corporate behavior.

In order to make this, the first portion of this paper will concentrate on the developments that cause the demand for the denationalization of norms in the planetary political economic system, giving a brief overview on the history and rise of TNCs and the planetary jobs caused by TNCs. Next, the paper will farther lucubrate on the troubles state provinces face when covering with these jobs, followed by an lineation on corporate codifications of behavior which aims to research why, how and if, codifications of behavior may offer a possible solution to these issues. Finally, the paper provides a decision of the current state of affairs.

Multinational Companies

Part Of The Problem Or Part Of The Solution?

The beginnings of Transnational Cooperations ( TNCs ) can be traced back to the clip of imperialism when largely Western European states, such as Great Britain, The Netherlands and France started to colonise abroad evidences in seek of new resources to utilize for their ain benefit. This enterprise developed itself through centuries to come, obtaining more form with the rise of capitalist economy in the nineteenth century. The importance of protecting and spread outing markets became bigger and the tendency to seek across the boundary line for alternate chances in hunt for particularly natural resources such as oil besides increased. After the Second World War foreign investing augmented to a great extent with which TNCs ‘ function in the planetary economic system foremost saw a size that should decidedly be taken into history.

Over the last few decennaries, siting on the farther development of globalization, Transnational Corporations have gained a batch of power in globalized universe. With the liberalization of international markets, through international trade administrations, the rise of regional organic structures ( EU ) and the gap up of new countries every bit such as Central and Eastern Europe, TNCs obtained a bigger range for their concerns and saw their powers increasing. Particularly in relation to state provinces, as states had to give some of their ain sovereignty to heighten trade.

Through farther ( international ) amalgamations and acquisitions, TNCs have been turning really quickly on a planetary base, going one of the richest and most dominant divisions of the globalized universe and hence being able to act upon their environment to a big extent.

A Multinational Corporation presents can be defined as a net income devising cooperation marked by two basic features:

1 ) it engages in adequate concern activities — including gross revenues, distribution, extraction, fabrication, and research and development — outside the state of beginning so that it is dependent financially on operations in two or more states ;

2 ) its direction determinations are made based on regional or planetary options. ( Greer, Kavaljit ; 2000 )

With mention to the first portion of above definitions, the followers can be said about the manner of operation of TNCs ; TNC largely operate as parent companies, holding it ‘s place base in the TNC ‘s state of beginning, exerting an important, commanding a subordinate in another state either straight ( if it is private ) or by having some or all of the portions ( if it is public ) . It largely outsources activities to an outside provider to better its public presentation. It can either make this at a foreign location which is called off shore, or at a domestic location, called hostel shore. Subordinates can hold a different name than the original parent company. The manner of relationships between parent and subordinate companies differs among TNCs, making an luxuriant web of assorted interconnected endeavors, each holding their ain different involvements in the peculiar industry.

Although TNCs do excite the flow of investing, engineering, net incomes etc. and through this have raised economic growing and employment rates, they are largely non really concerned with the well-being of the citizens of the states in which their subordinates operate, doing jobs with respect to human/labour rights, environment conditions and even authorities corruptness.

The increased power of TNCs brought about some serious broad making jobs in different sections of the modern globalized universe. TNCs are in frequent instances far richer and more powerful than national authoritiess and are hence able to rule economic systems and influence policymaking, holding consequence on the day-to-day lives of many others. Harmonizing to publications of the United Nations Conference on Trade and Development ( 2004 ) , TNCs economic power compares to that of states ( United Nations conference of trade and development, 2004 ; 4 ) .

Additionally, because of globalization ; the liberalization of trade policies, the deregulating of economic systems and denationalization of endeavors, national authoritiess at the same clip hold much less control over what goes on in their ain district or what their ain multinationals do elsewhere and they no longer have the resources they had in the past to work out these jobs.

In the economic field, TNCs have a inclination to rule industries, this because of their big multinational web of subordinates ( either private or public ) . Taking advantage of this, an frequently seen phenomenon here is intra-company trade, which fundamentally comes down to a modern signifier of oligopoly. Intra-company relates to minutess between subordinates that are portion of the same parent companies. This system can be harmful as it uses a technique known as “ transportation pricing ” .

The TNCs set monetary values for transportations of goods, services, engineering, and loans between their worldwide affiliates which diverge a great trade from the monetary values which other houses would hold had to pay. This manner a TNC maximises its ain net incomes and avoids national Torahs as the other company is related to the parent company and therefore portion of the same organizational construction. Besides, because the TNC has a world-wide web of subordinates, who, as mentioned before, are non ever utilizing the same name as the parent endeavor, it can switch financess around the universe without any existent revenue enhancement of it. Furthermore, TNCs can fluctuate the monetary values in relation to the local revenue enhancement rates of a peculiar state, making their ain profitable environment. To give an thought of the graduated table of this issue, the amounts involved in transportation mispricing would be more than plenty to run into the excess US $ 40-60 billion the World Bank estimates hapless states will necessitate yearly to run into the millenary development ends ( Christian Aid, 2008 ) . The ability of TNCs to put monetary values in above mentioned ways leaves national authoritiess unable to command their ain markets.

Furthermore, particularly hapless states are frequently dependent on TNCs for investing in their economic system. TNCs are regarded as an chance for economic growing, and developing states are hence eager to pull them. As indicated in the 2nd portion of the above given definitions ; TNCs establish their direction determinations on the local regulations. And if these local regulations and fortunes are favorable to their concern, a TNC will implement its concern at that place. So unluckily, as a consequence, this frequently comes down to the fact that these activities are being accepted and even concern ordinances and policies for labor, wellness, and the environment are loosened in favor of a TNC.

In the political field, corruptness, in the signifier of payoffs to act upon policy and determinations doing procedures are non uncommon.

Although the power of TNCs has at foremost been underestimated, attempts to take steps to modulate the behavior of TNCs better have been taken over the old ages. Yet, one job for state provinces to contend these issues is that with rapid globalization and the creative activity of large unfastened markets, a spread has been created between the range of range of a national, international or regional administrations and determination made by supra national organic structures, go forthing a large drama land for TNCs in between. It is off class every bit true that these combined forces of regional and international administrations are able to beef up the place of authoritiess by agencies of new Torahs, but wherever cooperation takes topographic point, liberty becomes a new issue excessively. Governments had to collaborate to make new policies, which could conflict with national jurisprudence, non doing the determination doing process any easier, or faster. Despite the being at the international degree of pacts, understandings and conventions, there is no set of international regulations to modulate concern activities and their impact on society ( United Nations conference of trade and development, 2004 ; 4 ) .

But the biggest job is, even though TNCs raise serious jobs that need to be taken attention of, restraint of their behavior is besides unwanted as they are seen as positive instruments to advance growing. On the one manus, state provinces wish to contend the state of affairs, on the other manus they can non as it will hold a negative impact on their ain economic wellbeing, making a confusion of involvements. Particularly hapless authorities can therefore choose to set net incomes before community involvements by digesting the behavior of certain TNCs.

A “middle of the road” attack in pull offing this affair is the development of codifications of behavior, an enterprise foremost introduced by NGOs in the 1980 ‘s. These codifications of behavior are ordinances to be adopted by TNCs to better the unbalanced power relation between corporations and state provinces and to excite TNCs to take greater societal duty for the effects of their corporate behavior. Codes of behavior can be seen as an look of corporate societal duty, but besides as regulation puting behaviour – efforts to assist make full some of the bing international institutional nothingnesss ( Kolk, new wave Tulder, 2005:1 ) . They contain guidelines, recommendations and regulations issued by entities within society ( following organic structure or histrion ) with the purpose to impact the behavior of ( international ) concern entities ( mark ) within society in order to heighten corporate duty. ( Kolk, new wave Tulder, 2005: 3 ) . Through the old ages a really diverse scope of participants have been involved in the development of codifications of behavior. These include corporations, concern associations, NGOs, labour brotherhoods, stockholders, investors, consumers, consultancy houses, authoritiess, and international organisations. Broadly talking, codifications of behavior can be divided into five chief types: specific company codifications, association, multi-stakeholder codifications, inter-governmental and international model understandings ( Singh K. 2007 ; 1-2 ) .

As mentioned before, corporate codifications of behavior were foremost introduced in the 1980 ‘s. Many state provinces considered this enterprise a promising enterprise, eager to seek farther support to implement it. It was clear that because of the immense extend of TNCs, national or higher degree powers do non hold adequate strength to command TNCs, while supra national organic structures are unable to put down policies that fit regional demands to break regulate.

Although there was adequate involvement shown by authoritiess from the developed universe every bit good as the development universe, the biggest job was to make a common understanding on the map, content and possible countenances against misdemeanor of these codifications by TNCs, chiefly because of different involvements between the developed and developing universe. This resulted in the fact that the codifications became voluntary alternatively of mandatary.

Although national authorities were convinced in the 80 ‘s that enterprises and markets could modulate themselves, the world turned out to be really different. When codifications of behavior were foremost introduced TNCs showed small involvement, but under force per unit area of large runs launched in developed states, concentrating on the abroad activities of good known trade name names, the first TNCs stated to follow these corporate codifications of behavior, fearing harm to their image.

Merely since the 1990 ‘s, TNCs themselves started to take enterprises, traveling off from the accent on the ideas of one individual histrion, something know as the “multi-stakeholder” attack ( Utting, Jenkins and Alva Pino, 2002: 61 ) . Multi-stakeholder codes address a huge scope of issues and supply independent monitoring mechanisms and, hence, are progressively viewed as a believable option. They are set up as non-profit organisations dwelling of alliances of companies, labour brotherhoods, and NGOs that develop specific criterions ( Singh K. 2007 ; 1-2 ) .

This alteration of attack was caused by a alteration of attitude on the stake- , share- and consumer side, which started to demo more involvement in the societal and environmental impact of TNCs behavior and hereby seting these subjects higher on the corporate docket. This alteration of attitude caused a concatenation reaction of in the restructuring of attack across endeavors, go oning to industry degrees and has created a certain huge criterion of outlook, particularly by the stake- and stockholders involved, which is positive advancement.

Although this development sounds promising, one of the inquiries raised here is if this development of augmented acceptance of corporate codifications of behavior truly implies an increased consciousness of corporate societal duty and existent betterment of corporate behavior.

First, when it comes to the bottom line, codifications of behavior are still non lawfully adhering. This means that no cooperation can be hold lawfully responsible when go againsting them.

Second, the contents of codifications of behavior can be questionable. Although the multi-stakeholder attack is the most often used manner of implementing codifications of behavior, there is now ordinance that prescribes a TNC to utilize this attack. They still have the autonomy to take whatever codification is convenient. Codes can hence be really hapless in their contents, non decently depicting policies or even go forthing out the most of import issues. Furthermore, because of the fact that each TNC is free to take its ain codifications of behavior, they vary really much among different industries, each advancing their ain standards and criterions. This creates a confusing state of affairs and makes it well easy for TNCs to still acquire off with certain patterns.

Additionally the word of TNCs can be lead oning. Enterprises may non ever have the right purposes when planing and accommodating codifications, but singly aim to advance and protect their image by misdirecting the populace. They can even utilize it as a strategic tool to bring forth positive PR alternatively, while at the same clip they go on as they have ever done, merely now with the false blessing of the populace by feigning to transport out corporate duty. What is written down on paper is often non carried out in pattern. This while one of the cardinal aims of the multi-stakeholder enterprises has been to better the quality of standard-setting, coverage, scrutinizing, monitoring and confirmation processs ( Utting, Jenkins and Alva Pino, 2002: 82 ) .

The deficiency of monitoring of the executing of corporate societal duty can ensue in the fact that TNCs restart to really implement codifications of behavior. The job here lies in the deficiency of transparence and confirmation which limits the effectivity of its execution. Most codifications do non hold a mechanism for answerability or followup ( United Nations conference of trade and development, 2004 ; 6 ) .

Above reference defects in system of utilizing codifications of behavior to coerce TNCs to pattern better societal behavior, consequence into the decision that codes of behavior in combination with the enhanced force per unit area on TNCs by new histrions, do raise corporate societal duty but nevertheless do merely supply a portion of the solution as their range is non extended plenty. These are some important issues that have to be overcome in order to do it work in pattern.

A possible solution could lie in the intervention of national Torahs. When set uping a relationship between concerns codifications of behavior can be included in the contract and hence doing them adhering. Besides, authoritiess could contend rogue TNCs by doing it possible to take legal stairss against endeavors which publish false codifications of behavior under Torahs on deceit. ( United Nations conference of trade and development, 2004 ; 7 ) This can do TNCs vulnerable as when being caught printing false statements, images are damaged and other histrions such as consumers, stake- and stockholders may withdraw as spouses.

Another legislative step could be the duty for TNCs to go transparent to the populace in footings of societal affairs. A good measure of national authoritiess is to necessitate endeavors and subordinates located on their district to supply statistical information on their work force and its fluctuation, rewards, wellness and safety, working conditions, preparation, labour dealingss, populating conditions, and measures taken in favor of employment. France has made an first-class illustration in 2002 by necessitating that all the biggest national and international endeavors located on their districts study on employee, community and environmental issues, and even more of import, how corporations ‘ subordinates respect the International Labour Organisation ‘s ( ILO ) cardinal conventions and how corporations promote these conventions among their affiliates ( United Nations conference of trade and development, 2004 ; 8 ) .

The undertaking of modulating TNCs remains a complex affair. Even though the attitude of civil society has changed, being able to set greater force per unit area on corporate behavior and therefore being able to alter it for the positive up to a certain extent, corporate codifications of behavior do non seems to be able to singly get the better of the state of affairs for now. Equally true nevertheless, great advancement has been made by agencies of this system, sing that it was foremost earnestly implemented in the 1990s. Therefore voluntary attacks decidedly could be used as tools to modulate on corporate behavior, nevertheless there is still a critical demand for a strong, crystalline and efficient supervisory model to supervise the right execution these policies. Even though alliances of companies, labour brotherhoods, and NGOs are at that place to vouch for this model, they do non posses the power to take any existent steps. The model could be found in the backup of national authoritiess, which can do the usage of corporate codifications of behavior more effectual by implementing them into the legal system.

This manner, measure by measure, TNCs and national authoritiess, combined with the attempts of NGOs, labour brotherhoods, and other civil society organisations, do hold the ability signifier a strong and clear policy.

Claire Delahaije – Global Governance February 2010

Get instant access to
all materials

Become a Member