Mr Siyasamkela Essay Example

meeting with the affected parties to sign a memorandum of understanding based on the outcome of these interactions. A meeting was arranged with Ward Councillor Nobuntu Mtsi, and the proposal of signing the consent forms was first tabled down. The councilor requested the consultants to propose another date for the meeting with affected parties and the Headman.

Arrangements were made for meetings and a thorough formal negotiation process took place involving the ward Cllr, affected parties, and traditional authorities. This ultimately led to the signing of the memorandum of understanding, and all stakeholders did not expect any issues with the proposed relocation. Relocating affected parties can be difficult, especially if they are not properly consulted. To prevent people from choosing inappropriate sites, all affected household owners played a key role in identifying alternative sites.

The project's planned relocation of households will occur within the same municipal ward and under the same traditional authority, known as "on site relocation". The households will not be moved beyond their village's immediate boundaries. General principles for relocation and resettlement include negotiating alternative sites with village collectives and affected parties. Traditional authorities will attempt to accommodate the affected households' requests for preferred sites within local planning regulations. Suitable sites have already been identified by all the parties involved. New construction will be built in harmony with local building culture and settlement layouts, especially when building new housing within or near existing settlements. Local builders or Ingcibi are preferred for building new houses for local people. While the client opted to use the on-site contractor for quality assurance and timely construction, this decision was discussed and welcomed by all parties involved. In principle,

new houses will be built before old ones are demolished.

If the old house is demolished before the new one is built, the affected household must receive subsidies to rent a temporary place. However, the old houses won't be demolished before new ones are constructed. The ADM must replace services like electricity and toilets that were missed due to relocation, and the identified sites don't need new services. Additionally, compensation or reconstruction of attachments like cattle enclosures ("ubuhlanti") will be provided. Local labor can build the kraals for about R800-R1000, not including materials which can be sourced from the adjacent community. These measures aim to ensure a smooth resettlement process and guarantee better housing conditions than before relocation.

The measures mentioned were proposed during a meeting on March 21, 2011 at Headman Phangalele’s location, by the affected households and local leadership. It is important to acknowledge that the Xhora area is undergoing an electrification program and the homesteads being relocated are all recipients of the program. Consequently, it is crucial to expedite the identification of alternative sites and accelerate the construction of new structures in these sites.

The individuals being relocated will incur the cost of connecting their homes to electricity due to delays in constructing new houses. The only issue mentioned was the possible excavation of a grave from Mr. Luyaba's current household, however he agrees to have it moved to their new location. The impacted households will be moved to an alternative site, which includes a plot for a proposed new rondavel already serviced by a V.I. Figure 1 shows the location next to the new rondavel, while Figure 2 displays the Luyaba family's site.

Figure 3 shows the P toilet alternative site, which was identified and approved by Chief Phangalele based on the feedback from the affected parties.