Jihad Vs McWorld Essay Example

same time. McWorld relies on interdependence while Jihad thrives on exclusivity. However, Barber proposes a solution where the economic benefits of McWorld can be enjoyed without sacrificing the exclusionary ideals of Jihad. This solution is a confederal government that embodies decentralized participatory democracy with elements of parochialism, communitarianism, and participatory administration. Barber argues that democracy should grow from the bottom up, starting with the people. For me, as people form countries, it is essential that principles of self-government and governance are well-defined and understood to prevent or minimize the excesses of McWorld and Jihad. Barber's discussions on the contrast between Jihad and McWorld paint a somber picture that may seem far-fetched but is nonetheless reflective of contemporary trends that could ultimately dissipate.The essay's value is in its timeliness; the discussed events were recent and possibly witnessed firsthand by readers. The claims can be verified by other sources and personal memories, particularly for those born during or shortly before the collapse of the Soviet Union or Quebecois unrest. Barber proposes a solution that is not extreme, but a mild adjustment to the current system for the wealthy. Students of history will benefit from Barber's work as he presents a moderate solution that combines the best of McWorld and Jihad. He allows readers to choose if they want to follow his proposal or develop a better one, which aligns with his belief in democracy. The middle-ground solution may take time, but moderation is the key to success; rushing it will only lead to failure. Like the tortoise, slow and steady wins the race.